Factors Influencing the Intention to Collaborate in Inclusive Teaming with Visually Impaired Peers: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach
Abstract
This study examined the factors influencing non-disabled university students’ intention to collaborate with visually impaired (VI) peers in inclusive team settings. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the research focused on four key variables: attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control (PBC), and awareness. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 113 non-disabled students at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Puncak Alam using convenience sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 27 to assess the correlation between the independent variables and students’ intention to collaborate with VI peers. Findings revealed that non-disabled students generally demonstrated high levels of intention to collaborate, with awareness being the most influential factor. While attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were positively associated with intention, only awareness was found to be a significant predictor, highlighting students’ recognition of the importance of understanding the needs and challenges faced by VI individuals. The study emphasizes the crucial role of awareness in fostering inclusive behavior. It suggests that increasing disability-related awareness through education and campus initiatives could significantly enhance inclusive collaboration practices among university students.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behaviour: Frequently asked questions. Human, Ajzen, Icek. “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665- 683, www.researchgate.net/publication /264004005_Perceived_Behavioral_Control_SelfEfficacy_Locus_of_Control_and_the_Theory_of_Planned_Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x. Accessed 24 Jan. 2025.
Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
Altman, T. (2008). Attitude: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Forum, 43(3), 144-150.10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00106.x
Baepler, P. (2023). Orientation and Social Inclusion: Supporting Students with Visual Impairments in Active Learning Classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 12(1), 100-114.
Bandura, A. (2013). Regulative function of perceived self-efficacy. In Personnel selection and classification (pp. 261-271). Psychology Press. behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Brewer, G., Urwin, E., & Witham, B. (2023, October 2). Disabled students' experiences of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2263633
Brookes, E. (2023, October 11). The Theory of Planned Behavior: Behavioral Intention. Simply Psychology. Retrieved November 27, 2024, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/theory-of-planned-behavior.html
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2014). Activity, Human, and Context. Elsevier EBooks, 40–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-09631-7.00003-x
Delgado-Gil, S., Mendoza-Muñoz, D. M., Galán-Arroyo, C., Denche-Zamorano, Á ., Adsuar, J. C., Mañanas-Iglesias, C., Castillo-Paredes, A., & Rojo-Ramos, J. (2023, June 2). Attitudes of Non-Disabled Pupils towards Disabled Pupils to Promote Inclusion in the Physical Education Classroom. 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061008
Department of Services and Development for Disabilities, UiTM. (2024, Oktober). Statistics of OKU students at UiTM. Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Fathy, E. A. F., & Fouad, A. (2022). Testing The Theory of Planned Behavior TPB in Determining Intention and Behavior to Hire People With Disabilities in Egyptian Hotels. (2)11 ,???????? ????? ???????? ??????? ???? ???? 819–747. https://doi.org/10.21608/mkaf.2022.254025
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Faúndez, F., & María, E. (2018). Attitudes towards the inclusion of university students with disabilities: Development and validation of a scale based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16(44), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v16i44.1944
Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2013). Attitudes without objects: Evidence for a dispositional attitude, its measurement, and its consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1060.
Kersh, J. (2011). Chapter Six - Attitudes about People with Intellectual Disabilities: Current Status and New Directions. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 199-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386495-6.00006-0
K?z?laslan, A., & K?z?laslan, M. M. (2018, June). Anxiety in Visually Impaired Students about the Future. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(2), 152-158. 10.11591/ijere.v7.i2.13263
Lourens, H. and Leslie, S. (2016). Experiences of Visually Impaired Students in Higher Education: Bodily Perspectives on Inclusive Education. Disability & Society, 1–12, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27917028/, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1158092. Accessed 24 Jan. 2025.
Lu, X., & Liu, J. (2022). Factors Influencing Public Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2018 HINTS Data. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.81602
Madhesh, A. (2022, November 16). Awareness of disability among Saudi university graduates. National Library of Medicine, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11647
Manitsa, I., & Doikou, M. (2020, July 17). Social support for students with visual impairments in educational institutions: An integrative literature review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 40(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620941885
McDonnall, M. C., & Lund, E. M. (2019, December 20). Employers’ Intent to Hire People who are Blind or Visually Impaired: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 63(4), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355219893061
Miyauchi, H., & Paul, P. V. (2020, September). Perceptions of Students with Visual Impairment on Inclusive Education: A Narrative Meta-Analysis. Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation, 10(2). .10.21554/hrr 092001
Mulu, E., & Geta, M. (2023, December 23). An Investigation of Learning Difficulties for Visually Impaired Students: Ethiopian Public Universities in Focus. 10(2), 99-123. https://journals.ju.edu.et/index.php/ejssls/article/view/5102
Parkinson, L., Hughes, M., & Bennett, R. (2025). Rethinking perceived behavioral control: Distinguishing self-efficacy from structural constraints in higher education. Journal of Applied Educational Psychology, 39(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00408-4
Reinhardt, W., Mletzko, C., Sloep, P., & Hendrik Drachsler. (2012). Understanding the Meaning of Awareness in Research Networks. ResearchGate, 931. https://www.researchgate.net/publication /230640624_Understanding_the_Meaning_of_Awareness_in_Research_Networks
Straw, E. (2024, January 5). Social Awareness: What is it & Why is it Important? Success Starts Within. https://www.successstartswithin.com/sports-psychology-articles/emotional-intelligence-f or-athletes/social-awareness/
Copyright (c) 2025 Saadiah Juliana Saadun, Siti Noorsuriani Maon, Mohammad Shahril Mohamed Besir, Roslinda Alias, Jazira Anuar, Jazmin Qistina Imran Nanang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.