Exploring Dilemmas about the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol under Modern Refugee Trends: International Refugee Law in Perspective

  • Lawrence Vorvornator University of Zululand
Keywords: The1951 Convention, The 1967 Protocol, international, refugees law; modern refugee trends, dilemmas

Abstract

The study explores the 1951 Convention’s dilemmas to assess whether it is abreast with modern refugee trends or not. Mixed-bag migration is explored under the Convention, unlike previous studies that concentrated on pull and push factors. Mixed-bag migration adoption sets this study apart from others. Aims- The study is necessary due to the open arms and solidarity of Europeans to receive Ukrainian refugees. In contrast, Syrian and Afghan refugees were discriminated against. Design- Grounded in Civil Solidarity as a Transformative Practice, and Building an infrastructure of Dissent, to explore the Convention’s dilemmas. The study adopts a literature review, otherwise known as a ‘‘meta-study. Findings-The findings reveal that the Convention is outdated with modern refugee trends; mostly children, women, and ordinary men. They commit no crimes to warrant any persecution. They migrated due to unbearable conditions, whereas in the 1950s, refugees were intellectuals, Soviet dissident men with different political opinions. The Protocol’s implementation triggered a ‘‘refugee floodgate. Refugees nowadays are non-Europeans, unlike 1950s. Refugees' floodgate led to civil solidarity withdrawal, and financial costs outweighed human rights, which contravenes the non-refoulement principle. Unsuccessful applicants are repatriated. The Convention neglects internal but protects international refugees. Contribution-I argue that a seventy-four-year refugee policy on inclusivity is needed with refugee-led organizations and governments for a public-private partnership. I recommend the Convention’s re-examination to ensure modern refugee law, which should contain burden-sharing mechanisms. Conclusion-In-depth academic debates on the Convention’s dilemmas and factors that trigger current refugee situations are needed. Since refugee demography has changed, but non-refoulement remains static.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adebayo, A.A., 2015. The legal regime for the protection of asylum seekers and refugees: An overview of the Geneva Convention 1951. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 6, 83-91.

Agustín, Ó.G., Buconjic, P., Jørgensen, M.B. and Salifu, M., 2024. Understanding solidarity practices with refugees. In Research Handbook on Asylum and Refugee Policy (pp. 305-319). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Agustín, Ó.G. and Jørgensen, M.B. (2018). Solidarity and the ‘Refugee Crisis' in Europe. Springer.

Bauder, H. and Juffs, L., 2020. ‘Solidarity ‘in the migration and refugee literature: analysis of a concept. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(1), 46-65.

BBC(2024).https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqxzzy5x7jo%23:~:text%3DNew%2520volunteers%2520hosting%2520Ukrainian%2520families,the%2520cost%252Dof%252Dliving.&ved=2ahUKEwiamuuLzPuJAxV1TkEAHYnhEg8QFRetrieved (26/11/2024).

Benhabib, S. (2020). The end of the 1951 refugee convention? Dilemmas of sovereignty, territoriality, and human rights. Jus Cogens, 2(1), 75-100.

TheCartagena(1984).file:///Users/lawrencevorvornator/Downloads/Dilemmas script to JPSS.docx Retrieved (26/11/2024).

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Federico, G., & Tena-Junguito, A. (2022). How many people are on Earth? World population 1800-1938. Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-16.

Fermi, L. (2021). Illustrious immigrants: The intellectual migration from Europe, 1930-41. Plunkett Lake Press.

Fischer, L., & Bak Jørgensen, M. (2021). “We are here to stay” vs. “Europe’s best hotel”: Hamburg and Athens as Geographies of Solidarity. Antipode, 53(4), 1062-1082.

Garnier, A. (2023). UNHCR and the transformation of global refugee governance: the case of refugee resettlement. In Research handbook on the institutions of global migration governance (pp. 50-62). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gorman, C. S. (2021). Defined by the flood: Alarmism and the legal thresholds of US political asylum. Geopolitics, 26(1), 215-235.

Hathaway, J. C. (2014). Food deprivation: a basis for refugee status?. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 81(2), 327-339.

IOM2018reports.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.iom.int/books/worldmigrationreport2018&ved=2ahUKEwji85n8i_mJAxU5Z0EAHS1vEMwQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2WVYegsDcRvA3oFobbCau0.Retrieved (26/11/2024).

Korsi, L. (2022). Do we go or do we stay? Drivers of migration from the Global South to the Global North. African Journal of Development Studies, 12(1), 71-87.

Korsi, V. L., & Mdiniso, J. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Religious Activities: A Case Study of Esikhaleni Settlement. Pharos Journal of Theology, 102.

Lee, E. S. (2017). Internal migration and population redistribution in the United States. In Population Growth (pp. 123-136). Routledge.

Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why are qualitative methods necessary for generalization? Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 111.

Mayblin, L. (2017). Asylum after empire: Colonial legacies in the politics of asylum seeking. Rowman & Littlefield.

Mendola, D., & Pera, A. (2022). Vulnerability of refugees: Some reflections on definitions and measurement practices. International Migration, 60(5), 108-121.

Mohor?i? Špolar, V. A., Landri, P., Milana, M., & De Vita, A. (2021). Adult education and migrations: Migrants a mixed bag?. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(1), 3-9.

Moran, C. F. (2021). Strengthening the principle of non-refoulement. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(6), 1032-1052.

Mujuzi, J. D. (2020). Reconciling customary law and cultural practices with human rights in Uganda. Obiter, 41(2), 239-256.

Murakawa, N. (2021). Ida B. Wells on racial criminalization. African American political thought: A collected history, 212-34.

Nalule, C. (2023). Refugee burden-and-responsibility sharing: Revisiting the debate on the right to compensation to refugee-hosting states. Mich. St. Int' 'l L. Rev., 31, 441.

Oyebamiji, S. I., Oyebade, O. O., Cohen, J. H., & Abraham, D. O. (2022). Echoes of Colour Discrimination in Refugee Protection Regime: The Experience of Africans Fleeing the Russia-Ukrainian War. Migration Letters, 19(5), 695-707.

Pécoud, A. (2018). What do we know about the International Organization for Migration?. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(10), 1621-1638.

Pijnenburg, A., & Rijken, C. (2021). Moving beyond refugees and migrants: Reconceptualising the rights of people on the move. Interventions, 23(2), 273-293.

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). Routledge.

Schimmel, N. (2022). Trapped by sovereignty: The fate of internally displaced persons and their lack of equal human rights protection under international law. World Affairs, 185(3), 500-529.

Sears, B. (2021). Equality Act Testimony: discrimination by state governments.

Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: a step-by-step guide to choosing data collection techniques for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1), 10-38.

Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 6.

Unitednationsreports(1951).https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.unhcr.org/aboutunhcr/overview/1951refugeeconvention%23:~:text%3DArticle%25201%2520of%2520the%25201951,such%2520fear%252C%2520is%2520unwilling%2520to&ved=2ahUKEwib5eki_mJAxUXYEEARetrieved (26/11/2024).

UNHCR(2021)reports.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.unhcr.org/publications/reportunitednationshighcommissionerrefugees1992&ved=2ahUKEwjJzs3qjPmJAxWoTEEAHefxIh4QFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0E8HrHfEWfids7JbFMnzrL.Retrieved (26/11/2024).

Vertovec, S. (2023). Superdiversity: Migration and social complexity (p. 251). Taylor & Francis.

Vianelli, L. (2022). Warehousing asylum seekers: The logistification of reception. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 40(1), 41-59.

Vorvornator, L. K. (2024a). Exploring South Africa’s Pre and Post-apartheid Border System: Border Securitisation, Illegal Migration and Cross-border Crimes. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 11(2), 123.

Vorvornator, L. K. (2024b). Exploring Poverty Alleviation through Internal and International Migration: Modern Migration Trends. African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society), 14(4), 77-95.

Vorvornator, L. K. (2024c). Are refugees more special than migrants? Exploring the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol in Modern Migration Trends. African Journal of Sociological & Psychological Studies (AJOSAPS), 4(2).

Vorvornator, L. K., & Enaifoghe, A. (2024). South African migration policy on the Zimbabwean special permit renewal experience: Diplomacy of weapons for power. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(8), e3514-e3514.

Published
2025-07-30
How to Cite
Vorvornator, L. (2025). Exploring Dilemmas about the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol under Modern Refugee Trends: International Refugee Law in Perspective. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 15(2(S), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v15i2(S).4553
Section
Research Paper