The Socio-Political Dynamic Import of Citizens Participation in Public Resource Management in Relation to Good Governance for South Africa

  • Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe Department of Public Administration, University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal
  • Tafadzwa C. Maramura Department of Governance and Public Administration, University of Fort Hare
  • Israel K. Ekanade Department of Development Studies, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo,
  • Hannah Muzee Pan African University, Institute of Governance, University of Yaoundé II, Soa, Cameroon
Keywords: Political processes, governance, interaction, accountability, economic performance

Abstract

This article looks at the social fundamentals in Africa’s political governance in relation to basic
leadership and its system of administration regarding public office holders vis-a-vis political leaders. In an
attempt to address the research question, it conceptualizes the dynamics of having a transparent government,
in the changing pattern in leadership in relation to good administration of governance and the management
of public goods and delivery of services to general public, a system for which the discourse changes in Africa’s
legislative issues. This article focuses on the structures of interaction from the national to local level it then
brings up development of events that seem to be basic to all African politics, which may have been inciting the
changes in the original patterns. It identifies socio-political and economic policies as bedrock that is central to
a country’s stability and development. Inevitably, a properly established economic policy is needed to ensure
the sustainability, strength, development, and delivery, of public goods efficiently. This article contributes to
the political discourse in Africa, which may have continued to this day and findings shows the obvious failures
on the part of political leaders’ and their inability to manage public resources, thereby making them deviate
from their campaign manifestos or become detached from people-centred fundamental issues of governance.
Qualitatively, this article is conducted and guided by Stewardship and Corporate Governance theory. It
objectively looks at the keys of good governance as its objective in the post-independence African public
sector in providing an enabling environment and effective regulatory framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akonor, K. (2013). Foreign aid to Africa: A hollow hope? International Law and Politics, 40, 1071–1078.
Amuwo, K. (2005). The Peripheral State: Critical perspectives on the structure and role of the public
bureaucracy. Journal of Development Alternatives, 24(3-4), 119-130.
Annan, K. (2004). The causes of conflict and the promotion of durable peace and sustainable development in
Africa. African Renaissance, 1, 9-43.
Arusha. (1990). African Charter for Popular Participation in Development Transformation. International
Conference on Popular Participation in the Recovery and Development Process in Africa, 12–16.
Ayittey, G. B. N. (2004). Why Africa is Poor: And what Africans can do about it. Johannesburg: Penguin Books.
Bondigas, A. (2019). Stewardship Theory of Corporate Governance.
Badun, M. (2004). Governance and public administration in the context of Croatian accession to the European
Union. In: Ott K (ed) Croatian accession to the European Union: institutional challenges. Institute of
Public Finance and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Zagreb
Blair, D. (2005). #220bn Stolen by Nigeria’s Corrupt Rulers. The Telegraph.
Booth, D. (2012). Development as a collective action problem: addressing the real challenge of African
governance. Synthesis report of the Africa Power and Politics Programme. Overseas Development
Institute: London.
Booth, D. & Cammack, D. (2013). Governance for Development in Africa: Solving Collective Action Problems.
Zed Books: London.
Brinkerhoff, D. W. & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2015). Public Sector Management Reform in Developing countries:
Perspectives Beyond NPM Orthodoxy. Public administration and development, 35, 222–237.
Carothers, T. & Saskia, B. (2014). Transparency, Participation, and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus?
Castells, M. & Himanen, P. (2014). Reconceptualizing Development in the Global Information Age (Oxford:
Oxford University Press).
Chabal, P. & Daloz, J. P. (1999). Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument, James Currey, Oxford.
Chigudu, D. (2018). Corporate governance in Africa’s public sector for sustainable development: The task
ahead, The Journal for Trans disciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 14(1), a512.
Dey, I. (2005). Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Enaifoghe, A. O. & Maramura, T. C. (2018). The Quest for Economic Development and the Impacts of Good
Governance in Africa Developing Countries. Journal of ACTA Universitatis Danubius (AUDA), 10(1), 17-
38.
Government-Linked Companies Research Centre (GLCRC). (2011). Corporate Governance TheoriesStewardship theory.
Government-Linked Companies Research Centre (GLCRC). (2012a). Corporate Governance and Human
Governance: Ethics.
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 533–574.
Gulrajani, N. (2015). Dilemmas in donor design: organization reform and the future of foreign aid agencies.
Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 152–164.
Hasan, S. (2019). Governance and Public Administration. In: Farazmand A. (Eds) Global Encyclopaedia of
Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham
Healey, P. (2004). Creativity and Urban Governance, Policy Studies, 25, 87-102.
Holomisa, B. (2017). Socio-political impact on Governance, Risk and Compliance Address by Mr. B Holomisa,
MP (UDM President) at the IT Web Governance, Risk and Compliance 2017. United Democratic
Movement (UDM).
International Monetary Fund. (2016). The IMF and good governance. Washington, D.C.: Communications
Department.
Kelsall, T. (2016). Thinking and working with political settlements (London: ODI).
Makinde, T. (2013). Global Corruption and Governance in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6, 8.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2016). Lions on the move II: Realizing the potential of Africa’s economies (New
York: McKinsey & Company).
Mogalakwe, M. (2006). Research Report. The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research.
African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221-230.
Obeng-Odoom, F. (2015). Africa: On the rise, but to where? Forum for Social Economics, 44, 234–50.
Olukoshi, A. (2018). Changing Patterns of Politics in Africa.
Omotoso, F. (2008). Corruption, Democracy, and Development in Nigeria. Ife Social Sciences Review, 1(23),
105-117.
Roe, E. (1993). Against power: For the politics of complexity, Transitions, 62, 90-104.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J, 50(155), 17–28.
Udo, E. S. (2004). Defining good governance–The conceptual competition is on. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.
UN-Habitat. (2016). World Cities Report 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures (Nairobi:
UN-Habitat).
United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Human development report 2002: Deepening democracy in
a fragmented world. New York: UNDP.
USAID (US Agency for International Development). (2014). Local Systems: A Framework for Supporting
Sustained Development. USAID, Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning: Washington, DC.
Walter, J. (2019). Stewardship Theory of Corporate Governance. MANAGEMENT, Biz fluent
Watts, M. (2007). Crisis in Nigeria. Retrieved April 22, 2019. www.counterpunch.org.
World Bank. (1991). Managing Development: The Governance Dimension. Discussion paper.
World Bank. (1993). Governance. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. (2012). The World Bank’s approach to public sector management 2011–2020: better results
from public sector institutions. Washington, DC: World Bank, Public Sector and Governance Board.
Published
2020-01-10
Section
Research Paper