The Dynamic Approaches in Enhancing Citizenry Participation in South African Local Government
The Constitution of South Africa is underpinned by the standards of good administration, featuring the significance of open interest as a basic component of an effective local administration, with respect to subject inclusion in a "local government" organization. The interest of citizens to participate in local government issues is viewed as having a noteworthy ramification on democratizing administration conveyance beyond simply delegate government, by having people and community as focal role players all the while. In South Africa, the need for the community to participate in local government administration offers a more prominent control of the underprivileged over their own circumstance and guarantees their full inclusion in deciding their very own formative needs. Along these lines, districts must assume a noteworthy job in advancing the majority rules system of democracy and guaranteeing that the community takes an interest in choices that influence them specifically. This study contends that regardless of its perplexing structures, obstructions, and serious administrative difficulties, citizens’ interest stay vital to the accomplishment of local government administration conveyance. The idea of community support as an indispensable factor for a fruitful government and delivery of good administration in the local circle was examined in this paper. The possibility of community interest in South Africa was bolstered by the declaration of different administrative structures which supported the contribution of individuals in local administration and strategy making. For instance, the White Paper on Local Government (1998) a qualitative analysis method was adopted by this study and the rational model was applied to place things in the correct points of view.
American Declaration of Independence. (1776). The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1989).
Ankersmit, R. (1997). Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. California: Stanford University Press.
Arat, Z. (1999). Human rights and democracy: Expanding or contracting. Polity, (32), 119 -144.
Bellamy, R. (2012). Rights as democracy. Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy, (15), 1–23.
Berger, E. 2003). The Right to education under the South African Constitution. Columbia Law Review, 103(3), 614–661.
Bernard, B. (1867). The Ideological origins of the American Revolution. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Boye, A. & Bassiouni, C. (1998). Democracy: its principles and achievement Inter – Parliamentary Union Geneva, 4, 37–38.
Cornwall, A. & Gaventa, S. (2001). Spaces for change: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas: 15–70. Available: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Cornwall-intro.pdf Accessed on 12 December 2018).
Deacon, R. & Piper, L. (2008). Party politics, elite accountability and public participation: ward committee politics in the Msunduzi Municipality. Transformation: 63–64.
Dey, I. (2005). Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Du Plessis, A. (2008). Public participation, good environmental governance and fulfilment of environmental rights. Potchefstroom Electronic Journal, 1–33.
Earle, C. E. (2007). Rational Decision-making in Higher Education. Stanford University: California. (Online) Available on https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED246828 (Accessed 25 December 2018).
ECNGOC (Eastern Cape NGO Coalition). (2018). The Eastern Cape Coalition.
Friedman, S. (2006). Participatory governance and citizen action in post-apartheid South Africa. Paper for International Institute of Labour Studies, 8–11.
Goebel, A. (2011). Our struggle is for the full loaf: protests, social welfare and gendered citizenship in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 37(2), 369–375.
Hamilton, M. (2007). Democracy and public service. In Richard, C. Democracy and public administration. M. E. Sharpe, Inc, 3–4.
Hanekom, S. X. & Thornhill, C. (1983). Contemporary Society: A South African Perspective. 1st Edition. MacMillan, S. A. (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg.
Ijeoma, E. (2013). South Africa’s public administration in context. Verity Publishers, 207–208.
Levi, M. A. (1998). State of trust in Braithwaite, Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 77–101.
Lister, M. (2012). There is no human right to democracy: But may we promote it anyway. Stanford Journal of International Law, 257–276.
Mogalakwe, M. (2006). Research Report. The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research. African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221-230.
Moseti, Y. (2010). Public participation for sustainable development in local cities Public Participation for Sustainable Development in Local Cities, paper presented during the International Society of City and Regional Planners congress, 4th October 2010, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nsingo, S. A. & Kuye J. O. (2005). Democratic participation for service delivery in local government in Zimbabwe: humanising structural configurations and legal provisions. Journal of Public Administration, 40(2), 744-760.
OECD. (2009). Studies on Public Engagement, Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services, 2009. (Online) Available on http://www.oecd.org/cleangovbiz/toolkit/50101671.pdf. (Assessed 22 February 2017).
Peruzzotti, E. (2012). Broadening the notion of democratic accountability: Participatory innovation in Latin America. Polity, 44(4), 626–630.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (1998). White Paper on Local Government, 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.
SALGA (South African Local Government Association). (2005). Conference Resolutions. SALGA National Conference. Cape Town: SALGA.
Smith, P. D. & McDonough, M. H. (2001). Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources, 14(3), 239-249.
South Africa. (1997). White Paper on Transforming Public Service Delivery. Batho Pele, 1997.
Stein, E. (2001). International integration and democracy: No love at first sight. American Journal of International Law, (95), 489–500.
Theron, F. & Mchunu, N. (2013). Contextualising public protests, the case of Khayelitsha. Administration Public, 21(2), 106.
Thomas, F. (1992). The emerging right to democratic governance. American Journal of International Law, 46–50.
Verba, B. (1999). Representing democracy and democratic citizens; philosophical and empirical understandings’ the tanner lecturers on human values delivered at Brasenose College, Oxford: 240–245.
Weiner, D. (1995). Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing, and local knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 30–44.
Woodford, R. & Preston, S. (2011). Strengthening citizen participation in public policymaking: A Canadian perspective. Parliamentary Affairs, 2–5.
Copyright (c) 2019 Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe, Toyin Cottis Adetiba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.