Political Space Competition between Online and Conventional Transportation in Jakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
The Presence of online transportation brings a new problem in Indonesia transportation market competition, many conventional transportation drivers, such as taxis, buses, motorcycle taxis, city transportation (Angkot) that reject the presence of online-based transportation. For conventional transportation drivers, the existence of online transportation has reduced their income because people prefer to use online transportation rather than conventional transportation. As the power holder, the government certainly has the right and authority to regulate and create policy harmonization for public transportation. This study uses qualitative method where primary data is obtained from 8 months observations, from November 2017 to June 2018. Secondary data are obtained from transportation ministerial regulations, regional regulations issued by the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government, and various discourses that developed in the media mass. Various data obtained are then sorted or filtered and crosschecked against other data. Based on our findings, the government has not been arranged adequate political space, especially for conventional transportation and online transportation in Jakarta. The slow pace of the central government to revise regulations regarding online transportation has triggered serious conflicts in the community. Digital revolution in the dimensions of online transportation in the public interest is what should be an integral part of previous government policies, and that never happened.
Downloads
References
Huning, S. (2008). Political Activity in Public Spaces: Awakening, Stagnation, or Fall? In M. Nowak, & M. Nowosielski, Declining Cities/Developing Cities: Polish and German Perspectives (pp. 190-201). Poznan: Instytut Zachodni.
Hutapea, E. (2017, September 6). Kompas.com.
Indiahono, D. (2009). Kebijakan Publik Berbasis Dinamic Analysis. Yogyakarta: Davamedia.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
Low, S. M. & Smith, N. (2006). The Politics of Public Space. New York: Routledge.
Safitri, M. (2015). Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Konflik Antara Taksi Konvensional dan Taksi Online. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif, 6(2), 138-148.
Stanton, W. J. (2000). Prinsip Pemasaran. (Y. Lamarto, Trans.) Jakarta: Erlangga.
Vandergeest, P. & Peluso, N. L. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24(3), 385-426.
Wahab, S. A. (2008). Analisis Kebijaksanaan; Dari Formulasi ke Implemen tasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wibowo, A. S. (2010). Kepublikan dan Keprivatan dalam Polis Yunani Kuno. In F. B. Hardiman, Ruang Publik: Melacak Partisipasi Demokratis dari Polis Sampai Cyberspace (p. 27). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Winarno, B. (2012). Kebijakan Publik (Teori, Proses dan Studi Kasus). Yogyakarta: Buku Seru.
Copyright (c) 2019 Yusa Djuyandi, Arief Hidayat, Jumroh .
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
