Understanding Culture through Knowledge Cybernetics
Abstract
These days, countries around the world continue with their process of globalization
in the digital business and marketing. However, they find themselves straddling different national cultures, which lead to problems of cross-cultural communication management resulting in, for instance, miscommunication and misunderstanding. Consequently, an understanding of the characterisation or mapping of culture is significant, and while there are not many theories of cultural mapping, most stem from the base work of Hofstede. Basically, most people begin with a categorisation of culture through the creation of an ontology that differentiates relatable levels of reality, as a theory of levels allows culture to be broken down into parts that can be analysed more easily. It also helps them to facilitate the creation of a set of generic or universal dimensions of culture which can be used to map different cultures. However, a problem with this theoretical approach is that it does not offer a very dynamic representation of culture, and it has manifestations that impoverish the way that phenomenal manifestations of culture can be explained. On the other hand, there is an alternative approach was adopted by Schwartz. This approach does not discuss ontology but it creates a value inventory in which respondents assess ‘comprehensive’ cultural values. Consequently, there is some relationship between outcome of Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s results. Yolles has developed a theory of Knowledge Cybernetics that delivers a new ontology and a dynamic modelling approach. Schwartz’s results have been merged into this, resulting in a new theory dynamic theory of culture quite distinct from Hofstede’s level theory.
Downloads
References
Kets de Vries, M.F.R. (1991). Organisations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organisational Behaviour and Change, Jossey-Bass Inc, USA. Kluckhohn, C. (1962). Universal categories of culture, in Tax, S., (Ed.), Anthropology Today: Selections (pp. 30420), University of Chicago Press, Chicago Kluckhohn, F., Strodbeck, F. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, Ill., Row Peterson. Kroeber, A.L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Peabody Museum, Cambridge, MA, 181. Kuhn S. T, (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Liang, SY., WU, W.C. (2001). The Roots of Illness Part 1 - Jing, Qi, and Shen, Syl Wushi Newsletter, Vol.1, No. 4, http://www.shouyuliang.com/newsletter/v1n4/v1n4a1.shtml, accessed June 2005. Maturana, H.R. (1975). The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7: 313-332. Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: the search for objectivity or the Quest for a compelling argument. Irish J. Psych. 9:25-82. Mingers, J. (1995). Self-Producing Systems. Academic Press, Mew York. Mwaura, G., Sutton, J., Roberts, D. (1998). Corporate and national culture - an irreconcilable dilemma for the hospitality manager? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 10(6)212-220 Peter, T. (1987). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. Macmillan, London. Ricoeur, P. (1967), The Symbolism of Evil (trans: Buchanan, E.), Beacon Press, Boston, MA. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: a theory of organisational change, Josey-Bass Inc., San Francisco. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S.C. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications (pp. 85-119), Sage, Thousand Oaks CA. Shi, X. M., Wang., J. Y. (2011), Interpreting Hofstede Model and Globe Model: Which Way to Go for CrossCultural Research? International Journal of Business and Management, 6(5) 93-99. Schutz, A., Luckmann, T. (1974). The Structures of the Lifeworld. Heinamann, London. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: managing rapport through talk across cultures, Continuum, London. Sunshine B, Wang, Y.H. (2003). Qi, Rui Dan and Self-excitation, JOURNAL OF WORLD SCIENCE 1, 197—212, Article No. 20030107, http://www.nobelac.com/science/jws/jws200301/Web/paperforJWS/ new333qipaperjws.pdf, accessed June 2005. Triandis, H.C., Suh, E.M. (2002). Cultural Influences on Personality, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 53:133–60. Also see https://psy-web.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/awei/Lecture%20notes/triandis%20ann%20rev%20 psychol%202002.pdf, accessed January 2007. Trompenaars (1997). Riding The Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, McGraw-Hill, Walsh, S. (2009), Kierkegaard: Thinking Christianity in an Existential Mode, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Wollheim, R. (1999). On The Emotions, Yale University Press. Yolles, M.I. (1998). Changing Paradigms in Operational Research Cybernetics and Systems, 29(2), 91-112. Yolles, M.I. (1999). Management Systems: a viable approach, Financial Times Pitman, London. Yolles, M.I. (2000). From Viable Systems to Surfing the Organisation, Journal of Applied Systems, 1(1)127-142 Yolles, M.I. (2006). Organisations a Complex Systems: an introduction to knowledge cybernetics, Information Age Publishing, Inc., Greenwich, CT, USA. Yolles, M.I., Fink, G., Frieden, R., 2012, Organisations as Emergent Normative Personalities: part 2, predicting the unpredictable, Kybernetes, 41(7/8)1014-1050. Yolles, M.I., Guo, K. (2003). Paradigmatic Metamorphosis and Organisational Development, Sys. Res., 20, 177199. Yolles, M.I., Iles, P. (2006). Understanding Public-Private Alliances through Knowledge Cybernetics: ethical frameworks and trust, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, in process. Yolles M., Sawagvudcharee O., & Fink G. (2010). Understanding Corporate Paradigm Change, International Association of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management (IACCM). University of Lancashire, Preston. Yolles M. & Sawagvudcharee, O. (2017). Conceptual Development on Strategic Management for Organizational Improvement, Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 17(3) 17-26.
Copyright (c) 2018 Ousanee Sawagvudcharee, Maurice Yolles, Chanchai Bunchapattanasakda, Buncha Limpabandhu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
