Nuclear Proliferation Deterrence: Bullying vs Diplomacy
Abstract
The article examines the plausibility of using sanctions as an instrument that can deter nuclear proliferation. Sanctions have been a favored policy tool in the arsenal of the international community, when it comes to issues relating to deterring nuclear proliferation. The adoptions of sanctions as a policy instrument that can quench the nuclear ambition of states and/or regimes are based on two main assumptions. First, it is believed that they add cost to the regime aspiring to acquire nuclear weapons, by limiting the regime’s access to finance and thus discourage it from furthering its nuclear ambition. Second, it is believed that the impact of sanctions on the welfare and well-being of the citizens of a targeted regime will prompt the citizens to rebel against the regime and perhaps force it to comply with the demands of the sanctions imposing party. This article however, took a dissimilar view and argues that sanctions as a single policy tool cannot check nuclear proliferation. At best they can be used to express discontent or signal displeasure to a regime with nuclear ambition. The article concludes that diplomacy devoid of rapacity is and will remain the plausible mechanism to deter nuclear proliferation.
Downloads
References
Alonso, A. (2012). Infrastructure and Methodologies for the Justification of Nuclear Power Programs, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
Bolton, D. (2012). North Korea’s Nuclear Program, American Security Project. www.americansecurityproject.org (March 14, 2017).
Buonanno, L., Cuglesan, F. & Henderson, U. (2015). The New and Changing Transatlanticism: Politics and Policy Perspectives, New York: Routledge.
Burns, R. (2017). James Mattis Calls North Korea a ‘Clear and Present Danger.’ Time, Jun 03. http://time.com/4804124/james-mattis-north-korea-china/ (April 16, 2017).
Charnysh, V. (2009). Pakistan’s Nuclear Program, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. http://charnysh.net/Documents/charnysh_pakistan_analysis.pdf (May 04, 2017).
Davenport, K. (2015). UN Security Council Resolutions on Iran, Fact Sheets and Briefs. Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Security-Council-Resolutions-on-Iran (February, 16, 2017).
Davenport, K. (2016). UN Security Council Resolutions on North Korea, Fact Sheets and Briefs, Arms Control Association.http://web.archive.org/web/20170415112133/https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/UN-Security-Council-Resolutions-on-North-Korea (April 12, 2017).
European Union Council. (2012). Council Decision 2012/152/CFSP. https://www.ukpandi.com/fileadmin/uploads/ukpi/Documents/Legal_sources/16.10.12%20Council%20Decision%20on%20Iran.pdf (March 02, 2017)
Fifield, A. (2016). Punishing North Korea: A Rundown on Current Sanctions. The Washington Post, 22 February.
Gordon, M. & Sanger, D. (2015). Deal Reached on Iran Nuclear Program; Limits on Fuel Would Lessen With Time. New York Times, July 14. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/15/world/middleeast/iran-nuclear-deal-is-reached-after-long-negotiations.html (April 03, 2017).
Hufbauer, P., Schott, G., Elliott, K. & Oegg, T. (2007). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered (3rd Ed), Washington: Peterson Institute.
Joyner, D. (2011). Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, F. (2005). The Real Nuclear Option: The Non-Proliferation Treaty is a Mess, We have to save it anyway.http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2005/05/the_real_nuclear_option.html (January, 17, 2017).
Kattan, A. (2013). Fact Sheet: Iran Sanctions, Centre for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. http://armscontrolcenter.org/publications/factsheets/fact_sheet_iran_sanctions/ (April 13, 2017).
Khan, D. (2012). Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Stanford University. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/khan2/ (April 17, 2017).
Lindee, S. (1994). Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Morrow, D. & Carriere, M. (1999). The Economic Impacts of the 1998 Sanctions on India and Pakistan. The Nonproliferation Review, 6(4), 1 - 16.
Norman, L. (2012). Swift to Cut Ties With Iran Banks after EU Ban. Wall Street Journal, March 15. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303863404577283532862521716 (March 02, 2017).
Norris, R. & Kristensen, H. (2007). Pakistani Nuclear Forces. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 63(3), 71- 73.
Raj, Y. (2015). Does Pakistan Have a Bigger Nuclear Arsenal than India? Hindustan Times, March 11. http://www.hindustantimes.com/world/does-pakistan-have-a-bigger-nuclear-arsenal-than-india/story-2OZTuMDfNp9IEkZA3hx6JL.html (February 10, 2017).
Sokolski, H. (2010). Reviewing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. http://www.npolicy.org/books/Reviewing_NPT/Full_Book.pdf (January 08, 2017).
Tabrizi, A. & Santini, R. (2012). EU Sanctions against Iran: New Wine in Old Bottles? Italian Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI), Analysis No. 97. http://www.ispionline.it/it/documents/Analysis_97_2012.pdf (May 16, 2017).
Toumaj, A. (2015). Deciphering the IAEA Report on Iran’s PMD. Foundation for Defense of Democracies, December 4. http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/amir-toumaj-deciphering-the-iaea-report-on-irans-pmd/ (January 18, 2017).
U.S. Department of Treasury. (2017). North Korea Sanctions. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/pages/nkorea.aspx (April 12, 2017).
Veeravalli, A. (2014). Gandhi in Political Theory: Truth, Law and Experiment, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Weiss, L. (2003). Atoms for Peace. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 59(6), 34 –44.
Winder, J. (2005). North Korean Bombshell Leads to Blowback. Korea Insight, 7(3), 1–4.
Copyright (c) 2017 Chidiebere C Ogbonna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
