Democratic System Strengthening Through Concurrent Election Implementation To Improve Political Stability and National Development
Abstract
Indonesian recently held a regional head concurrent elections in the first phase on December 9, 2015. Concurrent elections has been a historic moment for Indonesia to elect regional heads organized and structured massively. Concurrent election significance for Indonesian politics, especially at the local level, not only to read limited local democratic party, but rather an instrument for strengthening the democratic process. This research seeks to examine and analyze the democracy strengthening through concurrent election implementation in order to improve political stability of national development. In carrying out this study, researchers using qualitative methods. Whereabout the main data from this study is the researchers observation result on the concurrent election day, which is supported by several secondary data from the media. Featured models concurrent election (local concurrent election) is believed to be the best solution to counter the problems remaining in the elections execution, especially in two important reasons: First, the elections implementation effectiveness in order to realize the elections are more qualified and dignified from both the process and elections outcome aspects; second, the elections efficiency especially from the budget efficiency aspect which must be issued by the state to finance the electoral process.Downloads
References
Andersen, D. J. (2011). Pushing the Limits of Democracy: Concurrent Elections and Cognitive Limitations of Voters. New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey.
Azhari, A. F. (2004). Reformasi Pemilu dan Agenda Konsolidasi Demokrasi, Perspektif Ketatanegaraan. Jurisprudence, 1(2).
Dahl, R. A. (1999). On Democracy. Yale: University Press.
Gaffar, A. (2004). Politik Indonesia: Transisi menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies 25. Berlin: Elsevier.
Hayness, J. (2000). Demokrasi dan Masyarakat Sipil di Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Obor.
Held, D. (1987). Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hook, S. (1975). The Encyclopedia Americana. New York: Americana Coorporation.
Huntington, S. P. (1997). Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Lijphart, A. (1994). Presidentialism and Majoritarian Democracy: Theoretical Observations, in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Linz, J. J. & Arturo, V. (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
LIPI. (2014). Position Paper, Pemilu Nasional Serentak 2019. Jakarta: LIPI.
Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002003
Mayo, H. B. (2005). Mewujudkan Demokrasi Bermakna: Masalah dan Pilihan Indonesia. Jakarta: Demos.
Nordholt, H. S. & Ireen, H. (2006). Indonesian in Transition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nordholt, H. S. & Gerry, V. K. (2009). Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Pahlevi, I. (2014). Pilkada Serentak dalam RUU Pilkada. Bulletin INFO Kemendagri Brief, VI(2)/II/ P3DI/Jan/2014.
Samuels, D. (2000). Concurrent Elections, Discordant Result: Presidentialism, Federalism, and Governance in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 1-20.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2012). Capitalism Socialism and Democracy. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sorensen, G. (2003). Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia yang Sedang Berubah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suhelmi, A. (2001). Pemikiran Politik Barat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ubaedillah, A. & Rozak, A. (2006). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: ICCE UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
LEGISLATION
Law No 22 of 2014 regarding the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors
Law No. 1 of 2015 on Perppu Determination No. 1 of 2014 On the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors Become Law
Law No. 8 of 2015 on the Amendment of Act No. 1 of 2015 Concerning Determination No. 1 of 2014 Perppu On the Election of the Governor, Regent, and Mayor of the city Become Law
Law No 9 of 2015 on Local Government
Constitutional Court Decision No.22-24 / PUU / VI / 2008, dated December 19, 2008.
Supriyanto, D., Source: http://www.rumahpemilu.org/in/read/4679/treshold-dalam%20discourse%20elections [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].
http://www.konfrontasi.com/content/nasional/untuk%20anulir%20pilkada%20tak%20langsung%20sby%20keluarkan%20perppu [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].
http://www.kpu.go.id [Accessed: January, 15, 2016].
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Social and Development Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
