Strategic Issues of Regional Development: Government Policy Evaluation of Papua

  • Akbar Silo Cenderawasih University Papua

Abstract

The five-year period of development as outlined in the document RPJMD (Medium-Term Regional Development Plan), has achieved significant success, although there are still conscious strategic issues that are unsolved optimally. It can be traced from a series of evaluation studies to ensure consistency between the programs organized in 5 years with defined policy agenda to achieve the vision of local government. This study was conducted in a pragmatic approach that emphasizes the evaluation of policies: First, Integratif. An evaluation of the program and its financial package on cross institutions (Ind: SKPD/regional work unit). Secondly, comparatively, the achievements of development program compared with: (a) the goals stated in the document of Medium-Term Regional Development Plan (RJPMD/Ind), (b) development of mean achievement average per year, (c) the achievements of other areas, including a national scale and the achievement of the MDG's (Millennium Development Goal's).Object of the study are: All the goals set out in the mission to realize its vision of regional development as well as development programs and activities to achieve the targets and affect from various sources of financial. This study covers the gains of development programs within 5 years, including: macro achievements and outcomes for each development field. In addition, it is also obtained a description of the degree of relevancy, coherence, and correspondence between the realization of programs and activities with targeted goals, as well as the achievement of the mission and the development agenda so it can be measured the degree of the medium-term vision achievement. The district/city as a target sample of the study is Jayapura District, Puncak Jaya, District, Mimika District, and Jayapura city.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bitar, K., Hbeichi, R., Al-Zou'bi, L. & Russon, C. (2015). Evaluation Capacity Development through Cluster Evaluation. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, Claremont Graduate University, 11(24). ISSN 1556â€8180

Bourgeois, I. & Naré, C. (2015). The Usability of Evaluation Reports: A Precursor to Evaluation Use in Government Organizations. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, Claremont Graduate University, 11(25). ISSN 1556â€8180.

Dewanti. (2007). The Impact of Travel Pattern on Rural Transport Development. Journal Forum Teknik Sipil, XVII/3. Yogyakarta. UGM.

Fatem, A. (2011). Policies in Village Development: Learning from Community Empowerment and Participation in Jayapura. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 18(2), ISSN 0854 – 3844.

Feeny, S. & Clarke, M. (2009). The Millennium Development Goals in the Asia-Pacific: An Introduction. Palgrave-MacMillan: London.

Government of India Planning Commission. Ministry of Rural Development. (2006). Working Group on Rural Roads in the 11th Five Year Plan

Harnar, M. A. (2014). Developing Criteria to Identify Transformative Participatory Evaluators. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation. Claremont Graduate University, 10(22). ISSN 1556â€8180

Leviton, L. C. (2003). Evaluation Use: Advances, Challenges and Applications. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(4), 525-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400410

Robinson, R. & Thagesen, B. (2014). Ed. Road engineering for development. London: Spon Press

The Law on Special Autonomy for Papua, No. 21 of 2001, Supplement to the State Gazette 2001 No. 135.

The Law on National Development Planning System, No. 25 of 2004, Supplement to the State Gazette of 2004 No. 104.

The Law On Government Regional, No. 32 of 2004, Supplement to State Gazette 2004 No. 125.

Published
2016-07-06
How to Cite
Silo, A. (2016). Strategic Issues of Regional Development: Government Policy Evaluation of Papua. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 7(2), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v7i2.1305
Section
Research Paper