Develop Papua with Flakes of Spirit: Special Autonomy Authority
Abstract
A decade of development Papua special autonomy authority, it still spawned numerous ripples of dissatisfaction. The authority should be implemented optimally, faced with various obstacles, both internal within the government and the people of Papua, as well as external mainly from the Central Government. However, there is no denying behind the dissatisfaction, the fact that there is success and progress that will benefit the government and the people of Papua. Dissatisfaction that arises only because the treatment of the special autonomy is half-hearted and inconsistent, so the degree of achievement of development should be more meaningful again. This study is considered very important to give meaning to the success of development inspired by the values of special autonomy in its rules implementation. Besides being one of the chain of the management cycle of development, is also a mandate of Act No. 21 of 2001. In connection with that, as product policies, its review refers to the policy dimensions of implementation and performance policy.Downloads
References
Bratic, V. (2010). Local Self-Government in Central and Eastern Europe - A Strong and Independent Local-Level Management Tool or Just a Paper Tiger? Review Article. Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb UDC 352(4-11)
Djojosoekarto, A. (2008). Kinerja Otonomi Khusus Papua. Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan. Jakarta.
Gandhi, M. M. (2013). Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education an Indian Perspective. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0353337
Ife, J. & Tesoriero, F. (2008). Alternatif Pengembangan masyarakat di Era Globalisasi Community Development. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–7388, p-ISSN: 2320–737X 3(5) (Nov. –Dec. 2013), 33-37.
Lee, C. Y. (2010). Between Dependency and Autonomy –Taiwanese Entrepreneurs and Local Chinese Governments. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261003900103
Ministry of National Development Planning /BAPPENAS. (2008). Evaluasi Tiga Tahun Pelaksanaan RPJMN Bersama Menata Perubahan.
Papua Provincial Government. Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Papua Nomor 10 Tahun 2006 Tentang RencanaPembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Provinsi Papua Tahun 2006-2011.
Sutherland, H., Raben, R. & Lochre-Scholten, E. (2002). Rethinking Regionalism : Changing Horizon in Indonesia 1950s-2000s in Nordholt, Henk Schulte dan Irwan Abdullah. (ed). 2002. Indonesia in Search of Transition. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
Suebu, B. (2003). Otonomi Khusus Papua, Masalah dan Prospek. Article. Submitted in "study group" East-West Center Project on the Dynamics and Management of Internal Conflicts in Asia in Denpasar Bali on August 15, 2003.
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Social and Development Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
