Steering Through Multi-Level Contradictions: Paradoxical Leadership in the Sustainability Transition of Malaysian Higher Education
Abstract
Sustainability leaders in Malaysian higher education navigate paradoxes embedded in institutional efforts to implement sustainability agendas. By drawing on comparative case studies of two public and two private universities, it reveals how leaders confront multi-level tensions ranging from macro-level policy ambitions to individual-level ethical dilemmas. These tensions include national policy ambitions versus limited support, organizational growth imperatives versus environmental commitments, and individual ethics versus pragmatic workload demands. Using semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and limited observation, this study investigates how these tensions are nested and cascading in nature: contradictions at one level intensify dilemmas at another. Leaders adopted dynamic strategies (e.g. symbolic gestures, temporal and spatial separation, and integrative reframing) to cope with or manage paradoxes. Notably, public and private universities differed in these tensions and the dominant logic driving responses: Public institutions leaned toward symbolic and compliance strategies due to bureaucratic constraints, while Private institutions pursued integration framed within market imperatives. The findings contribute to paradox theory by illustrating how sustainability tensions are experienced and managed across institutional levels. The study also offers practical insights into developing leadership capabilities, aligning HRM systems with sustainability goals, and fostering multi-level coherence in sustainability governance. These insights are especially pertinent for universities seeking to advance meaningful sustainability transformations amid persistent structural and ideological contradictions.
Downloads
References
Avery, A., Cresswell, K., Crowe, S., Huby, G., Robertson, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100-108.
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.
Blanco-Portela, N., Benayas, J., Pertierra, L. R., & Lozano, R. (2017). Towards the integration of sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A review of drivers of and barriers to organizational change and their comparison against those found in companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 563-578.
Bohunovsky, L., Radinger-Peer, V., Zint, M., and Penker, M. (2023). Change agents under tension: a paradox approach to strategies for transforming higher education toward sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9), 372-392.
Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win–wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 54–79.
Carmine, S., & De Marchi, V. (2023). Reviewing paradox theory in corporate sustainability toward a systems perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 139-158.
Castro-Gómez, J., Sánchez-Torres, J. A., & Ortiz-Rendón, P. A. (2024). Influence of sustainability in the positioning of the university brand: Study in universities in Medellín-Colombia. Heliyon, 10(9).
Christiansen, S.H., Du, X. and Guerra, A.O.P.D.C., 2024. Middle Management Leadership Experiences of a Mission-Driven Innovation University Strategy. Education Sciences, 14(6), 609.
Clarke, T., & Crane, A. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 303–313.
Ehnert, I. (2009). Conceptual model for sustainable HRM and a paradox framework. In Sustainable Human Resource Management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective (pp. 163-181). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L. and Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316.
Hardman, J. C. (2023). Transformational leadership strategies in US public universities. Pepperdine University.
Isa, H. M., Sedhu, D. S., Lop, N. S., Rashid, K., Nor, O. M., & Iffahd, M. (2021). Strategies, challenges and solutions towards the implementation of a green campus in UiTM Perak. Planning Malaysia, 19.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280.
Kemp, N., & Scoffham, S. (2022). The paradox model: towards a conceptual framework for engaging with sustainability in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(1), 4-16.
Kleinman, I.L., 2010. Academic capitalism and the community college (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama Libraries).
Luo, B.N., Tang, Y., Chen, E.W., Li, S. and Luo, D., 2020. Corporate sustainability paradox management: A systematic review and future agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 579272.
Milosevic, I., Bass, A. E., & Schulte, B. (2023). The interplay of conflicting and complementary institutional logics in sustainability practices. Management International Review, 63(3), 469-506.
Muhiddin, A. A. M., Isa, H. M., Sakip, S. R. M., Nor, O. M., & Sedhu, D. S. (2023). Green campus implementation in the Malaysian public universities: Challenges and solutions. Planning Malaysia, 21.
Quaresma, M. L., Villalobos, C., Rojas-Murphy, A., & Molina-Salas, F. (2024). Institutional Ethos of Less Selective Massive Private Universities in Chile: Organizational Identities in a Competitive and Marketized University System. Education Sciences, 14(8), 903.
Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S., and Smith, W.K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5-64
Schaefer, S.M. (2019). Willful managerial ignorance, symbolic work and decoupling: A socio-phenomenological study of ‘managing creativity’. Organization Studies, 40(9), 387-1407
Sitong, M.C., (2022). Investigating tensions in sustainability in Chinese and New Zealand business partnerships: An empirical analysis. In Leadership and China (pp. 89-119). Routledge.
Smith, W.K. and Besharov, M.L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1-44.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
Spinrad, M. L., Relles, S. R., & Watson, D. L. (2022). Not in the greater good: Academic capitalism and faculty labor in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(12), 912.
Sutawaidjaya, A. H., Yusuf, M., & Hamdi, E. (2024). Building Sustainability in Higher Education through Green Management and Innovation: A Case Study of Private Universities in Jakarta. Journal of Eco Humanism, 3(6), 1034-1047.
Umar, S. B., Ahmad, J., Mohd Bukhori, M. A. B., Ali, K. A. M., & Hussain, W. M. H. W. (2025). Transforming Higher-Education-Institutes: Impact of Change Management on Sustainable Performance Through Transformational Leadership and Knowledge Management. Sustainability, 17(6), 2445.
Vesudevan, M., Abdullah, Z., Vasudevan, A., & Qin, P. (2025). Integrating sustainable leadership in Malaysian higher education: Effective strategies for implementation and impact. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(4), 2025115-2025115.
De Villiers, C., Dimes, R. and Molinari, M., 2025. The role of sustainability awards in institutionalizing sustainability: Case study evidence. The British Accounting Review, p.101735.
Yang, W., Chinedu, C. C., Chen, W., Saleem, A., Ogunniran, M. O., Ñacato Estrella, D. R., & Vaca Barahona, B. (2024). Building capacity for sustainability education: An analysis of vocational teachers’ knowledge, readiness, and self-efficacy. Sustainability, 16(9), 3535.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashman Shahrudin Bin Khairuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
