Impacts of Social Network Characteristics on Digital Seizing Capabilities and Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Advanced Manufacturing Clusters in China

  • Ranlin Zhao Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Lian Kee Phua School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Keywords: Social network characteristics; digital seizing capability; sustainable performance; advanced manufacturing clusters

Abstract

This study examines how Social Network Relational Characteristics (SNRC) and Social Network Structural Characteristics (SNSC) influence Sustainable Performance (SP) in China’s advanced manufacturing clusters, with the mediating role of Digital Seizing Capability (DSZC). Drawing on Social Network Theory and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, SP is modeled as a second-order construct comprising economic, environmental, and social performance. Survey data from 236 firms in eight national-level clusters were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).Results show that SNRC directly and indirectly enhance SP through DSZC, while SNSC impacts SP only indirectly via DSZC. This highlights DSZC as a critical mechanism for converting network advantages into sustainability outcomes. The study advances theory by integrating relational and structural network dimensions with dynamic capabilities and offers practical guidance for managers and policymakers to strengthen network relationships and digital capabilities to foster sustainable competitiveness in the Industry 4.0 era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, J., Raza, S., Nurunnabi, M., Minai, M. S., & Bano, S. (2019). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Business Networks on Firms’ Performance Through a Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability, 11(11), 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006

Anaya, L., & Qutaishat, F. (2022). ERP systems drive businesses towards growth and sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 204, 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.103

Baig, M. I., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Nizam Bin Md Nasir, M. H. (2023). Influence of big data adoption on sustainable marketing and operation of SMEs: A hybrid approach of SEM-ANN. Management Decision, 61(7), 2231–2253. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2022-0778

Bhatti, S. H., Sumbal, M. S., Ahmed, A., & Golgeci, I. (2024). Digital strategy for firm performance- mediating role of digital platform capabilities and digital culture in manufacturing SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2339379

Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). CORRECTED 24 APRIL 2009; SEE LAST PAGE. 323.

Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (n.d.). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward a new theory. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816

Chen, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, Z., & Shen, H. (2024). How does digital enablement affect product customization? The roles of innovation capability and network embeddedness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123272

Cohen, H. B. (1998). The performance paradox. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(3), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.1109048

Elaouzy, Y., & El Fadar, A. (2024). Resource depletion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 53, 1190–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.114

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st?century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Frishammar, J., Cenamor, J., Cavalli-Björkman, H., Hernell, E., & Carlsson, J. (2018). Digital strategies for two-sided markets: A case study of shopping malls. Decision Support Systems, 108, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.003

Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.375

Gshayish, J., & Faik, Z. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence systems and technology on the sustainability of the quality of financial reports. Al Kut Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 469–488. https://doi.org/10.29124/kjeas.1549.21

Hair. (2020). Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM.

Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132

Henao, R., Sarache, W., & Gómez, I. (2019). Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: Trends and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.116

Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Carbajal Gamarra, F. M., Flores, A., & Heredia, W. (2022). How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal”. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100171

Ikumapayi, O. M., Laseinde, O. T., Ogedengbe, T. S., Afolalu, S. A., Ogundipe, A. T., & Akinlabi, E. T. (2023). An Insight into AI and ICT Towards Sustainable Manufacturing. In V. Bindhu, J. M. R. S. Tavares, & C. Vuppalapati (Eds), Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems (Vol. 977, pp. 271–280). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7753-4_21

K. M., M., Aithal, P. S., & K. R. S., S. (2023). Government initiatives and digital Innovation for Atma Nirbhar MSMEs/SMEs: To Achieve Sustainable and Inclusive Economic Growth. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0256

Khan, N. U., Wu, W., Saufi, R. B. A., Sabri, N. A. A., & Shah, A. A. (2021). Antecedents of Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability, 13(2), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020897

Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Kessler, A., & Schweiger, C. (2018). Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: Measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty054

Landherr, A., Friedl, B., & Heidemann, J. (2010). A Critical Review of Centrality Measures in Social Networks. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(6), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3

Liu, Z., Mu, R., Hu, S., Li, M., & Wang, L. (2018). The Method and Application of Graphic Recognition of the Social Network Structure of Urban Agglomeration. Wireless Personal Communications, 103(1), 447–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5454-6

Lopes De Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Ndubisi, N. O., & Roman Pais Seles, B. M. (2020). Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: Progress and directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107567

Mendrela, P., Stanek, W., & Simla, T. (2024). Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production based on nuclear energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 49, 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.156

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373

Napoli, F. (2023). Corporate Digital Responsibility: A Board of Directors May Encourage the Environmentally Responsible Use of Digital Technology and Data: Empirical Evidence from Italian Publicly Listed Companies. Sustainability, 15(3), 2539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032539

Nayal, K., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Priyadarshinee, P., & Narkhede, B. E. (2022). The impact of sustainable development strategy on sustainable supply chain firm performance in the digital transformation era. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2921

Oelze, N., Hoejmose, S. U., Habisch, A., & Millington, A. (2016). Sustainable Development in Supply Chain Management: The Role of Organizational Learning for Policy Implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(4), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1869

Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the Relationships Between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management and Organizational Sustainability: Antecedents, Sustainable Supply Management, and Sustainability Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03212.x

Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002

Pinho, J. C., & Prange, C. (2016). The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.001

Ronald S. Burt. (1980). Models of Network Structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 79–141.

Shang, H., Chen, R., & Li, Z. (2020). Dynamic sustainability capabilities and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of resource management capabilities. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2011

Shi, G., Ma, Z., Feng, J., Zhu, F., Bai, X., & Gui, B. (2019). The impact of knowledge transfer performance on the artificial intelligence industry innovation network: An empirical study of Chinese firms. PLOS ONE.

Sun, Z., Wang, W., Wang, W., & Sun, X. (2023). ????1How does digital transformation affect corporate social responsibility performance? From the dual perspective of internal drive and external governance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, CSR. 2615. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2615

Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.12736089

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%253C509::AID-SMJ882%253E3.0.CO;2-Z

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808

Vo Thai, H. C., Hong-Hue, T.-H., & Tran, M.-L. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and digitalization as antecedents of innovation and sustainable performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese SMEs. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 18(2), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-08-2023-0325

Warner, K. S. R. (2018). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

Xie, H., Wang, W., Yang, Z., & Choi, Y. (2016). Measuring the sustainable performance of industrial land utilization in major industrial zones of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.016

Xu, S., Alsaleh, N., Kumar, D. T., Palaniappan, M., Elfar, A. A., & Ataya, S. (2024). Enabling customer participation for the implementation of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140803

Yin, J., & Shi, S. (2019). Analysis of the mediating role of social network embeddedness on low-carbon household behavior: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 858–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.274

Zheng, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Digital transformation, corporate social responsibility and green technology innovation- based on empirical evidence of listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 424, 138805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138805

Published
2025-11-23
How to Cite
Zhao, R., & Phua, L. K. (2025). Impacts of Social Network Characteristics on Digital Seizing Capabilities and Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Advanced Manufacturing Clusters in China. Information Management and Business Review, 17(4(I), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i4(I).4639
Section
Research Paper