Examining the Intersection of Civil Society and Democratization: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
This study critically examines the dynamic interplay between civil society and democratization using a bibliometric analysis. The analysis is based on 461 scholarly articles published between 1977 and 2024 in the Scopus database. The data analysis was performed using Harzing Publish or Perish and VOSviewer to identify publication trends, key contributors, research impact, and emerging clusters in the field. The findings reveal that research on civil society and democratization has shown an increasing trajectory over the past decade, with the United States of America as a prominent contributor to the study. Through keyword analysis, several avenues for future exploration in civil society and democratization have been proposed. These avenues include comparative research on civil society, exploring digital transformation and civil society, investigating civil society's involvement in climate change governance and global migration, and integrating interdisciplinary approaches to better understand the challenges and opportunities for civil society in contemporary political environments.
Downloads
References
Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on web accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 250–258.
Ahmi, A., & Mohd Nasir, M. H. (2019). Examining the trend of the research on extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): A bibliometric review. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 1145–1167.
Baxter, M. K., Lee, J., & Odai, M. (2024). The paradox of elites in civil society: A comparative study on civil society leaders’ satisfaction with democracy in the UK and Sweden. Voluntas, 35, 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00669-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00669-0
Beissinger, M. R. (2017). " Conventional" and" Virtual" civil societies in autocratic regimes. Comparative Politics, 49(3), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820934267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820934267
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1996). An agenda for democratization. New York, NY: United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/230086?ln=en&v=pdf
Çakmak, Z. and Ta?kiran, C. (2020). Development of civil literacy scale: a study of validity and reliability. Review of International Geographical Education Online. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.713522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.713522
Criado, J. I., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, E. A., & Mendoza, R. E. V. (2018). Revisiting the open government phenomenon: A meta-analysis of the international literature. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 10(1), 50–81. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v10i1.454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v10i1.454
Davis, A. P., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Civil society and democracy under pressure: does authoritarian mobilization and party incapacity diminish the positive effect of civil society? The Sociological Quarterly, 65(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2289500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2289500
Fatton, R. (1995). Africa in the age of democratization: The civic limitations of civil society. African Studies Review, 38(2), 67-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/525318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/525318
Faxon, H. O., Kintzi, K., Tran, V., Wine, K. Z., & Htut, S. Y. (2023). Organic online politics: Farmers, Facebook, and Myanmar's military coup. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/20539517231168101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231168101
Gibson, J. L. (2001). Social networks, civil society, and the prospects for consolidating Russia’s democratic transition. Social capital and the transition to democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), https://doi.org/51-69. 10.2307/2669359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669359
Hadenius, A., & Uggla, F. (1996). Making civil society work, promoting democratic development: What can states and donors do? World Development, 24(10), 1621-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00062-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00062-9
Hearn, J. (2001). The ‘uses and abuses’ of civil society in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 28(87). https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240108704502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240108704502
Hendriks, C. M. (2006). Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 54(3), 486-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00612.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00612.x
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy's fourth wave?: digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001
Jaysawal, N. (2013). Civil society, democratic space, and social work. Sage Open, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013504934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013504934
Lewis, D. (2002). Civil society in African contexts: reflections on the usefulness of a concept. Development and Change, 33(4), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00270
Mace, G. (2023). Democratic Practices in MERCOSUR and the OAS: What Space for Transnational Civil Society? Global Society, 38(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2237044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2237044
Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps027ra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
Mexhuani, B. and Rrahmani, F. (2017). The relationship between political parties and civil society. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 05(04). https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000295
Moura, R. A. d., Bastos, H. A. D., Brandt, K. C. d. O., Ronca, D. B., & Ginani, V. C. (2022). Public consultation in the construction of the district food and nutrition policy. Saúde em Debate, 46(134), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202213415i DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202213415
Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004
Okowa, M. (2015). The fallacy behind the role of civil society in transitional democracies: the case of Kenyan ethno-political conflicts. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 9(3), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2013.0640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2013.0640
Omeni, A. (2022). Framing injustice: special anti-robbery squads (SARS) in Nigeria and the #EndSARS protest response from a social movement theory perspective. Modern Africa, 10(2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.26806/modafr.v10i2.409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26806/modafr.v10i2.409
Phatharathananunth, S. (2006). Civil society and democratization: social movements in northeast Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. (2024). Democracy through technocracy? Reinventing civil society as a state-monitored and unpaid service provider in the EU FLEGT VPA in Laos. Global Environmental Change, 85, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102809
Saab, F., Bermejo, P. H. d. S., Garcia, G. C., Pereira, J. S., & Silva, S. d. A. M. e. (2018). Does public consultation encourage social participation? Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(5), 796-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-11-2017-0169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-11-2017-0169
Schrama, R., & Zhelyazkova, A. (2018). “You can’t have one without the other”: The differential impact of civil society strength on the implementation of EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 1029–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1433709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1433709
Scholte, J. A. (2002). Civil society and democracy in global governance. Global Governance, 8(3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/27800346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00803004
Schotten, M., Meester, W. J., Steiginga, S., & Ross, C. A. (2017). A brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation database of scientific literature. In Research analytics (pp. 31-58). Auerbach Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155890-3
Sharif, M. H. M., Ahmi, A., & Rosli, K. (2020). Measuring the trend of the research on social media in SMEs: a bibliometric evaluation. Test Engineering and Management, 82, 6437-6446.
Simsa, R. (2019). Civil society is captured by early-stage autocrats in well-developed democracies – the case of Austria. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10(3), 20190029. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0029
Tang, S. Y., & Zhan, X. (2008). Civic environmental NGOs, civil society, and democratization in China. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 425-448. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00220380701848541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701848541
Tusalem, R. F. (2007). A boon or a bane? The role of civil society in third- and fourth-wave democracies. International Political Science Review, 28(3), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107077097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107077097
Udzhmadzhuridze, H., Bilan, S., & Kryvoshein, V. V. (2019). Individual significance of political participation in today’s Ukrainian society: the case of Dnipro city. Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2019/12-1/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-1/11
Uhlin, A. (2009). Which characteristics of civil society organizations support what aspects of democracy? Evidence from post-communist Latvia. International Political Science Review, 30(3), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109105639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109105639
White, G. (1994). Civil society, democratization and development (I): Clearing the analytical ground. Democratization, 1(2), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349408403399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349408403399
Copyright (c) 2024 Irwana Nooridayu Muhamad Hakimi, Azmil Mohd Tayeb, Hafizah Hammad Ahmad Khan, Mohamad Ili Afiq Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
