CSR-Driven STEM Education: Case Study on PolyDuino Arduino Kits Implementation in Secondary Schools, Kedah
Abstract
The persistent challenge in STEM education is the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, particularly in underserved communities where access to advanced educational tools is limited. This study, conducted as part of a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program, aims to address this issue by evaluating the effectiveness of the PolyDuino Arduino Kit in enhancing STEM education among secondary school students. The study specifically targeted Form 2 and Form 3 students from four selected schools in the districts of Kuala Muda and Yan, Kedah. A experimental research design was employed, involving approximately 120 students who participated in a series of hands-on workshops facilitated by trained educators. Data were collected through observational assessments and self-reported surveys, focusing on students' engagement, conceptual understanding, problem-solving skills, and collaborative behaviour. The findings revealed that 70% of the students demonstrated a strong understanding of the PolyDuino Arduino concepts, with 50% frequently applying their knowledge to create functional projects. Additionally, the study observed significant improvements in student engagement and collaboration, although variations in problem-solving effectiveness were noted. The implications of this study highlight the potential of CSR programs to make substantial contributions to education by providing valuable resources and opportunities for practical learning, particularly in regions with limited access to educational tools. Despite its promising outcomes, the study's limitations include a geographically constrained sample and the short-term nature of the data collection, suggesting the need for future research to explore long-term impacts and broader applicability.
Downloads
References
Aspin, S. H., Ali, M., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2022). STEM education in Malaysia: A review. Learning Science and Mathematics Journal, 15, 125-139. Retrieved from http://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_LSMJournal/images/docs/2022/2022_9_ASPIN_125139.pdf.
Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2017). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229-243.
Blikstein, P. (2018). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. M. Voogt et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research on education and technology (pp. 109-123). SAGE Publications.
Durak, H. Y., Bilici, S. C., & Baran, E. (2023). Engineering design-based Arduino activities in STEM education. In Theoretical and Practical Teaching Strategies for K-12 Science Education in the Digital Age (pp. 66-78). IGI Global.
Economic Planning Unit. (2021). National fourth industrial revolution (4IR) policy. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department.
Edward, O. T. (2023). Thoughts: Robotics igniting a passion for STEM education. Bernama. https://bernama.com/en/thoughts/news.php?id=2241938.
Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2022). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136.
Hom, E. J., & Dobrijevic, D. (2022, October 26). What is STEM education? Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/43296-what-is-stem-education.html.
Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., & Nachiappan, S. (2023). Challenge and obstacles of STEM education in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4), 820–828. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i4/16676.
Jamiaan, M., & Mohd Adam, H. A. (2023). Penambahbaikan rekabentuk kit PolyDuino PolySumo V2 bagi pengajaran dan pembelajaran sistem terbenam (Embedded System). National Conference in Education Technic & Vocational Education and Training “Overcoming Challenges for Sustainable Development In TVET“, 1(1), 1-10. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17791.79528.
Karaahmeto?lu, K., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The effect of project-based Arduino educational robot applications on students' computational thinking skills and their perception of basic STEM skill levels. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 1-14.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 1-11.
Kondaveeti, H. K., Kumaravelu, N. K., Vanambathina, S. D., Mathe, S. E., & Vappangi, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on prototyping with Arduino: Applications, challenges, advantages, and limitations. Computer Science Review, 40, 100364.
Martínez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2019). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). (2020). National Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2021-2030. https://www.mosti.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/National-Science-Technology-and-Innovation-Policy-2021-2030.pdf.
Nabavi, R. T. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory. Theory of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 1-24.
Plaza, P., Sancristobal, E., Carro, G., Blazquez, M., García-Loro, F., Martin, S., Perez, C., & Castro, M. (2018). Arduino as an educational tool to introduce robotics. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615143.
Ragusa, G., & Leung, L. (2023). The impact of early robotics education on students’ understanding of coding, robotics design, and interest in computing careers. Sensors, 23(23), 9335.
Selcuk, N. A., Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2024). Does educational robotics improve secondary school students’ course motivation, achievement, and attitude? Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.
The Sun. (2024, April 2). Concern over students’ lack of interest in STEM. Ineffective teaching methods among factors contributing to decline of learners opting for science stream. https://thesun.my/local-news/concern-over-student-lack-of-interest-in-stem-GJ12286990.
Tulivuori, J. (2021). Four case studies on how to give STEM education a push. Development Asia. https://development.asia/summary/four-case-studies-how-give-stem-education-push.
Wu, P., & Anderson, R. C. (2020). Enhancing problem-solving skills through robotics projects: An application of experiential learning theory. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(1), 1-16.
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171-203.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohd Azmi Hambali, Husaini Aza Mohd Adam, Mahdzir Jamiaan, Norin Rahayu Shamsuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
