Evaluating the Efficacy of Cosmetic Product Safety Regulations in Malaysia: The Role of the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA) and Industry Compliance

  • Yuhanza Othman Department of Laws, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka
  • Mimi Sofiah Ahmad Mustaffa Department of Laws, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka
  • Ida Rahayu Mahat Department of Laws, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka
  • Marziana Ab Malib Department of Laws, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka
  • Muhammad Nizam Awang Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
Keywords: Cosmetic products; National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA); cosmetic product safety, safety regulation, cosmetics directives

Abstract

Various legislative measures, such as the Sale of Drugs Act 1952, Control of Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations 1984, Poison Act 1952, Guidelines for Control of Cosmetic Products 2022, and other directives introduced by the NPRA in Malaysia, are intended to control the safety of cosmetic products. Despite these existing laws and directives, cosmetic products containing hazardous ingredients persist in the Malaysian market. NPRA reportedly received 1,041 complaints about cosmetic products in 2022, while its website also displays an annual increase in cases involving cosmetic products that contain hazardous ingredients. The persistent presence of harmful cosmetic products in the market highlights significant gaps in efforts to control hazardous cosmetic products. This study examined the efficacy of cosmetic product safety regulations in Malaysia, focusing on the role of the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA) and industry compliance. This qualitative study gathered data from library databases and conducted semi-structured interviews with NPRA officers, cosmetic manufacturers, and cosmetic industry experts. Findings suggest that despite the extensive nature of the regulatory framework, its implementation, which heavily relies on self-regulation and post-market surveillance, requires serious improvement. While some cosmetic producers adhere to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards, there are still persistent issues related to product notification, misuse of self-regulation, and inadequate penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, an intensive awareness campaign aimed at cosmetic manufacturers is necessary to ensure the production of safe cosmetic products. Consumers must play their role in helping the NPRA control the sale of hazardous cosmetic products by performing safety checks before purchasing them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad. A. W., Seet, W, T., Anuar, K., Maarof, M. & Idrus, R. (2013). Facility Management of Good Manufacturing Practice Laboratory for Human Cell and Tissue Therapy - UKM Medical Centre Experience. Regenerative Research. 2. 26-31.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2013). ASEAN Consumer Information Handbook on Cosmetic Products. Jakarta: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). pp.1-20

Bernama (2024, August 5). MOH Revokes Notification of Three Cosmetic Products. Bernama.com. https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php

Calcott, P. (2010). Mandated self-regulation: The Danger of Cosmetic Compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 38(2). pp.167–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9124-1

Control of Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations 1984

Daum, C. (2006). Self-Regulation in the Cosmetic Industry: A Necessary Reality or a Cosmetic Illusion? Harvard Business Review, 1–32.

Gudowska, B. (2017). The Power of Quality in Product Management of Cosmetics. The Case of Halal Beauty Products. Globalization, the State and the Individual, 3, 29–39.

Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective. Law & policy, 19(4). pp. 363-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.t01-1-00033

Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (2017). Smart regulation. Regulatory Theory, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.22459/rt.02.2017.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/RT.02.2017.08

Hegde, V., & Konakanchi, K. (2011). Case Study-Post-Market Product Monitoring System. In 2011, the Proceedings-Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. IEEE. pp. 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2011.5754520

Huzaifi, A. (2014, Nov 5). Surveillance on Registered Products in the Market. Retrieved from My Health Ministry of Health: http://myhealth.moh.gov.my.

Ismail, S. Z., Zalina Zakaria, & Zulkifli, N. S. (2019). Kontroversi Pensijilan Halal di Malaysia: Beberapa Isu Terpilih Membabitkan Produk Makanan. Proceeding 4th International Seminar Halalan Thayyiban Products and Services 2019, Bandar Seri Begawan: UNISSA Press. 28-38.

Malaysian Guidelines for the Control of Cosmetic Products 2022.

Mesa, C. L. (2015). The Control of Adulteration of Cosmetic Products by Pharmaceutical Services Division (PSD) in Malaysia. (Master Thesis). Universiti Malaya

Moore, I. (2009). Manufacturing Cosmetic Ingredients According to Good Manufacturing Practice Principles. Global Regulatory Issues for the Cosmetics Industry. 79–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-8155-1569-2.50011-7

National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (2015). History.https://www.npra.gov.my/index.php/

National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (2022) Annual Report. Selangor: National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency

National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (2024). Cancellation of Notify Cosmetic Products. https://www.npra.gov.my/index.php. accessed

Othman, N. N., Zakaria, Z., & Atiqah Aziz. (2020). Legal Control for the Safety of Cosmetic Products Application Use in Malaysia. Journal of Halal Industry & Services. 1–6.

Power, C. (2010). Cosmetics, identity, and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 73–94.

Rahse, W. (2019). Cosmetic Creams Development, Manufacture and Marketing of Effective Skin Care Products. Wiley-VCH GmbH &Co, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527812219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527812219

Roslan, M. A., Abdul Aziz, N., Abd Rani, A. R., Roslan, R., & Che Mohamad, C. A. (2023). Product Liability Law: Producer’s Liability for Harmful Cosmetic Products. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH). e002323-e002323. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i5.2323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i5.2323

Sale of Drugs Act 1952 [Act 3368]

Salleh, N. S. N. (2013). Product Information File ( PIF): What to Expect From the Audit ? [Power Point presentation]. National Regulatory Conference. 7-9 May 2013. Kuala Lumpur.

Sinclair, D. (1997). Self-Regulation Versus Command and Control ? Beyond False Dichotomies *. Law & Policy, 19(4), 529-559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00037

Tecson, J. (2021). Total Makeover: Federal Cosmetics Regulation and Its Need for Legislative Overhaul to Ensure Consumer Protection. Golden Gate UL Rev. 127-147

The Star (2024. August 5). Health Minister Bans Three Cosmetic Products for Containing Toxic Substances. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news

Zakaria, Z. (2015). Regulation of Cosmetics: What has Malaysia Learnt from the European System? Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9271-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9271-3

Zakaria, Z., Musa, M. Z. E., & Gani, P. M. D. S. S. A. (2019). The Compelling Trend of Halal Cosmetic Industry in Malaysia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 1689–1699.

Published
2024-10-07
How to Cite
Othman, Y., Ahmad Mustaffa, M. S., Mahat, I. R., Ab Malib , M., & Nizam Awang, M. (2024). Evaluating the Efficacy of Cosmetic Product Safety Regulations in Malaysia: The Role of the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA) and Industry Compliance. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3(I)S), 855-864. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.4117
Section
Research Paper