Evaluating Internal Control Mechanisms in Malaysian Public Sector Initiatives: Insights from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports

  • Ainol Sarina Ahmad Zazili Faculty of Accountancy, UiTM Melaka Branch
  • Dr. Nor 'Asyiqin Faculty of Accountancy, UiTM Melaka Branch
  • Siti Aisyah Basri Faculty of Accountancy, UiTM Melaka Branch
  • Enylina Nordin Faculty of Accountancy, UiTM Melaka Branch
  • Wan Shafizah Hussain Universiti Teknologi MARA
Keywords: Public accounts committee, control environment, risk assessment, control activity, information and communication and monitoring

Abstract

This study examines internal control challenges in Malaysian government projects, drawing on Public Accounts Committee (PAC) reports from 2019 to 2022. The focus on this period stems from the shift in PAC chairmanship from government to opposition, which enhanced perceived independence. However, the literature suggests that the PAC’s success depends more on collaborative decision-making than on the chairman’s political affiliation. Analyzing 29 government agencies across various sectors revealed recurring weaknesses in internal controls. The study employed the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s (COSO) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (ICIF) to systematically identify these weaknesses. A content analysis method was used to examine the themes, which were grouped into five ICIF components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Weaknesses in the control environment include conflicts of interest, compromised ethical values, inadequate governance, and a lack of accountability and transparency. Risk assessment deficiencies were found in financial risk management, procurement and acquisition risks, geopolitical and strategic risks, intellectual property and technology risks, and project management risks. Control activity weaknesses involved poor resource and process management, non-compliance, and flawed decision-making. Information and communication issues included poor documentation, inadequate system integration and data sharing, limited stakeholder engagement, weak communication protocols, and poor information management. Monitoring deficiencies were noted in regulatory compliance, contract management, financial oversight, monitoring systems, and disbursement tracking. Addressing these weaknesses in internal controls is crucial for minimizing the risks of fraud, waste, and loss of public trust

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaraji, F. A. A. S., Ali, K. S., & Sabri, T. M. (2023). Reflection of the integrative relationship between Six Sigma technology standards and internal control elements according to the COSO framework on improving performance quality. General Management, 24(192), 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.192.10

Akinleye, G. T., & Kolawole, A. D. (2020). Internal controls and performance of selected tertiary institutions in Ekiti State: A Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) framework approach. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(1), 405–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n1p405

Ariffin, A., Mohd Hanif, F., Ali, S., Abdul Razak, N., & Muhamad Sori, Z. (2016). The implementation of an internal control system among Malaysian Credit Co-operatives. Malaysian Journal of Co-operative Studies, 12, 1-20.

Baral, G., & Cakirsoy, E. (2023). Measuring the level of awareness of COSO internal control standards in metropolitan municipalities in Turkey. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.2-01

Bouheraoua, S. & Djafri, F. (2022). Adoption of the COSO methodology for internal Shar??ah audit. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(2), 221235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-04-2020-0071

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/05/2750-New-COSO-2013-Framework-WHITEPAPER-V4.pdf

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2023). Achieving effective internal control over sustainability reporting (ICSR): Building trust and confidence through the COSO internal control—Integrated framework. https://www.coso.org/guidance-on-ic

D’Aquila, J. M. (1998). Is the control environment related to financial reporting decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(8), 472–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909810236334

Global Financial Integrity. (2017). Illicit financial flows to and from developing countries: 2005-2014. https://gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/GFI-IFF-Report-2017_final.pdf

Gul, F. A., & Mahzan, N. (2013). Auditing: Theory and practice in Malaysia. CCH Asia Pte Ltd.

Hamed, R. (2023). The role of internal control systems in ensuring financial performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15, 10206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310206

Le, T. T. H., & Tran, M. D. (2018). The effect of internal control on asset misappropriation: The case of Vietnam. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(4), 941–953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.64

Li, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Thoughts on digital transformation and evaluation of enterprise internal control system based on COSO framework. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 172–176). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3616712.3616743

Mahmud, A., Susilowati, N., Anisykurlillah, I., Aeni, I. N., & Sari, P. N. (2024). Internal control and financial viability: The moderating role of leadership qualities on the management of income-generating activities at Indonesian higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 358–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2022-0162

Mardjono, E. S., Suhartono, E., & Hariyadi, G. T. (2024). Does forensic accounting matter? Diagnosing fraud using the internal control system and big data on audit institutions in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 638–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.53

Musah, A., Padi, A., Okyere, B., Adenutsi, D. E., & Ayariga, C. (2022). Does corporate governance moderate the relationship between internal control system effectiveness and SMEs' financial performance in Ghana? Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2152159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152159

Padlee, S. F. (2021). The practice of the Public Accounts Committee in the Parliament of Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 159–174.

Parliament of Malaysia. (2018). Standing order. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/images/webuser/peraturan_mesyuarat/PMDR-eng.pdf

Parliament of Malaysia. (2024, September 27). Public Accounts Committee (PAC) publications. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/pac/publication-details.html?id=66

Rendon, J. M., & Rendon, R. G. (2022). Analyzing procurement fraud in the US Navy. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1297–1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0207

Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2022). Internal control implementation in higher education institutions: Determinants, obstacles, and contributions toward governance practices and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 141–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2020-0246

Watkinson, I. (2022). Handbook on parliamentary financial oversight: Adapting PAC best practices for small legislatures. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.

Yaakob, A. F., Kadir, N. A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Accountability from the perspective of Malaysian governance. Journal of Politics and Law, 2(3), 48–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v2n3p48

Yahya, N., Said, J., Zakaria, N. B., & Fuad, M. F. M. (2022). Analyzing the internal control system in Malaysian statutory bodies: How well do they adhere to the global standard? International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 12(3), 612–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v12-i3/15178

Zainal Abidin, Z., Muhammad Sori, Z., Mat Daud, Z., & Senik, R. (2019). Perceived public accounts committee independence: The Malaysian case. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 9(2), 209–220.

Zakaria, K. M., Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2016). Internal controls and fraud: Empirical evidence from oil and gas company. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1154–1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2016-0021

Published
2024-10-07
How to Cite
Ahmad Zazili, A. S., Abu, N. ’Asyiqin, Basri, S. A., Nordin, E., & Hussain, W. S. (2024). Evaluating Internal Control Mechanisms in Malaysian Public Sector Initiatives: Insights from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3(I)S), 924-936. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.3941
Section
Research Paper