Evaluating Internal Control Mechanisms in Malaysian Public Sector Initiatives: Insights from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports
Abstract
This study examines internal control challenges in Malaysian government projects, drawing on Public Accounts Committee (PAC) reports from 2019 to 2022. The focus on this period stems from the shift in PAC chairmanship from government to opposition, which enhanced perceived independence. However, the literature suggests that the PAC’s success depends more on collaborative decision-making than on the chairman’s political affiliation. Analyzing 29 government agencies across various sectors revealed recurring weaknesses in internal controls. The study employed the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s (COSO) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (ICIF) to systematically identify these weaknesses. A content analysis method was used to examine the themes, which were grouped into five ICIF components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Weaknesses in the control environment include conflicts of interest, compromised ethical values, inadequate governance, and a lack of accountability and transparency. Risk assessment deficiencies were found in financial risk management, procurement and acquisition risks, geopolitical and strategic risks, intellectual property and technology risks, and project management risks. Control activity weaknesses involved poor resource and process management, non-compliance, and flawed decision-making. Information and communication issues included poor documentation, inadequate system integration and data sharing, limited stakeholder engagement, weak communication protocols, and poor information management. Monitoring deficiencies were noted in regulatory compliance, contract management, financial oversight, monitoring systems, and disbursement tracking. Addressing these weaknesses in internal controls is crucial for minimizing the risks of fraud, waste, and loss of public trust
Downloads
References
Alaraji, F. A. A. S., Ali, K. S., & Sabri, T. M. (2023). Reflection of the integrative relationship between Six Sigma technology standards and internal control elements according to the COSO framework on improving performance quality. General Management, 24(192), 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.192.10
Akinleye, G. T., & Kolawole, A. D. (2020). Internal controls and performance of selected tertiary institutions in Ekiti State: A Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) framework approach. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(1), 405–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n1p405
Ariffin, A., Mohd Hanif, F., Ali, S., Abdul Razak, N., & Muhamad Sori, Z. (2016). The implementation of an internal control system among Malaysian Credit Co-operatives. Malaysian Journal of Co-operative Studies, 12, 1-20.
Baral, G., & Cakirsoy, E. (2023). Measuring the level of awareness of COSO internal control standards in metropolitan municipalities in Turkey. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.2-01
Bouheraoua, S. & Djafri, F. (2022). Adoption of the COSO methodology for internal Shar??ah audit. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(2), 221235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-04-2020-0071
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/05/2750-New-COSO-2013-Framework-WHITEPAPER-V4.pdf
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2023). Achieving effective internal control over sustainability reporting (ICSR): Building trust and confidence through the COSO internal control—Integrated framework. https://www.coso.org/guidance-on-ic
D’Aquila, J. M. (1998). Is the control environment related to financial reporting decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(8), 472–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909810236334
Global Financial Integrity. (2017). Illicit financial flows to and from developing countries: 2005-2014. https://gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/GFI-IFF-Report-2017_final.pdf
Gul, F. A., & Mahzan, N. (2013). Auditing: Theory and practice in Malaysia. CCH Asia Pte Ltd.
Hamed, R. (2023). The role of internal control systems in ensuring financial performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15, 10206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310206
Le, T. T. H., & Tran, M. D. (2018). The effect of internal control on asset misappropriation: The case of Vietnam. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(4), 941–953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.64
Li, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Thoughts on digital transformation and evaluation of enterprise internal control system based on COSO framework. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 172–176). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3616712.3616743
Mahmud, A., Susilowati, N., Anisykurlillah, I., Aeni, I. N., & Sari, P. N. (2024). Internal control and financial viability: The moderating role of leadership qualities on the management of income-generating activities at Indonesian higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 358–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2022-0162
Mardjono, E. S., Suhartono, E., & Hariyadi, G. T. (2024). Does forensic accounting matter? Diagnosing fraud using the internal control system and big data on audit institutions in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 638–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.53
Musah, A., Padi, A., Okyere, B., Adenutsi, D. E., & Ayariga, C. (2022). Does corporate governance moderate the relationship between internal control system effectiveness and SMEs' financial performance in Ghana? Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2152159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152159
Padlee, S. F. (2021). The practice of the Public Accounts Committee in the Parliament of Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 159–174.
Parliament of Malaysia. (2018). Standing order. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/images/webuser/peraturan_mesyuarat/PMDR-eng.pdf
Parliament of Malaysia. (2024, September 27). Public Accounts Committee (PAC) publications. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/pac/publication-details.html?id=66
Rendon, J. M., & Rendon, R. G. (2022). Analyzing procurement fraud in the US Navy. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1297–1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0207
Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2022). Internal control implementation in higher education institutions: Determinants, obstacles, and contributions toward governance practices and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 141–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2020-0246
Watkinson, I. (2022). Handbook on parliamentary financial oversight: Adapting PAC best practices for small legislatures. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
Yaakob, A. F., Kadir, N. A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Accountability from the perspective of Malaysian governance. Journal of Politics and Law, 2(3), 48–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v2n3p48
Yahya, N., Said, J., Zakaria, N. B., & Fuad, M. F. M. (2022). Analyzing the internal control system in Malaysian statutory bodies: How well do they adhere to the global standard? International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 12(3), 612–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v12-i3/15178
Zainal Abidin, Z., Muhammad Sori, Z., Mat Daud, Z., & Senik, R. (2019). Perceived public accounts committee independence: The Malaysian case. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 9(2), 209–220.
Zakaria, K. M., Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2016). Internal controls and fraud: Empirical evidence from oil and gas company. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1154–1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2016-0021
Copyright (c) 2024 Ainol Sarina Ahmad Zazili, Nor 'Asyiqin Abu, Siti Aisyah Basri, Enylina Nordin, Wan Shafizah Hussain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.