Institutions and Sustainability Entrepreneurship in SMEs: A Conceptual Model
Abstract
The government has integrated sustainability management into its agenda to rectify environmental degradation. A new study called “sustainability entrepreneurship”, which relates sustainability management with entrepreneurial endeavors has also been established. Sustainability management is crucial because it allows small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to develop competitive advantages by fulfilling customers’ demand for sustainable products. However, the participation of SMEs in sustainability management is low and many of them fail to disclose their environmental information. This phenomenon has caused problems in encouraging sustainability management commitment among SMEs and failure in achieving 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Therefore, this paper aims to unravel the relationships of institutional elements on proclivity on sustainability entrepreneurship among SMEs. Based on a review of existing literature on Institutional factors, a proposed model was developed to assess proclivity towards sustainability entrepreneurship among SMEs. The result of this study would be useful to create the knowledge of institutional theory and the actual behavior of proclivity of sustainability entrepreneurship, to create new knowledge in the future. This research contributes to universities, policymakers and business practitioners. As for universities, it helps to develop a new model to enrich the literature in entrepreneurship studies. In terms of policymakers and business practitioners, it helps to identify important factors in developing true sustainability entrepreneurs among SMEs.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Albrecht, J. (2002). Environmental issue entrepreneurship: a Schumpeterian perspective. Futures, 34(7), 649-661.
Belz, F.M. and Binder, J.K. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: a convergent process model”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 2(1).
Binder, J.K. and Belz, F.M. (2015), “Sustainable entrepreneurship: what it is”, in Kyrö, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Research, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 30-71.
Bjorck, F. (2004). Institutional theory: A new perspective for research into IS/IT security in organizations. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 5-pp). IEEE.
Carsrud, A. and Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial Motivations: What Do We Still Need to Know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26.
Cialdini, R., (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12 (4), 105–10
Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49.
Dantas, J. G. L., Moreira, A. C., & Valente, F. M. (2015). Entrepreneurship and national culture: How cultural differences among countries explain entrepreneurial activity. In Handbook of research on the internationalization of entrepreneurial innovation in the global economy (pp. 1-28). IGI Global.
Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.
Dean, T.J. and McMullen, J.S. (2007). Towards a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76.
De Clercq, D. and Voronov, M. (2011). Sustainability in Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Logics. International Small Business Journal, 29(4), 322-344.
Dorado-Mayorga, E. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship and new business models: market research in Colombia. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 875-894.
Eleventh Plan 2016-2020 Malaysia Anchoring Growth on People, Economic Planning Unit: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2016.
Gast, J., Gundolf, K. and Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: a systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 44-56, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065.
Graham, S. (2010). What is Sustainable Entrepreneurship? Retrieved June 8, 2011, from http://biznik.com/article s/what-is sustainable-entrepreneurship.
Gray, B.J., Duncan, S., Kirkwood, J. and Walton, S. (2014). Encouraging sustainable entrepreneurship in climate-threatened communities: A Samoan case study”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5/6), 401-430.
Haigh, N. and Hoffman, A.J. (2014). The new heretics hybrid organizations and the challenges they present to corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 223-241.
Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 26(4), 33.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London, UK: McGraw Hill.
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
Jiang, X.C. and Yang, J.F. (2010). Environmental Entrepreneurship: A Good Business Model in Low-carbon Economy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, 588-591.
Kassim, N. M., & Abdullah, N. A. (2008). Customer loyalty in e?commerce settings: an empirical study. Electronic Markets, 18(3), 275-290.
Koe, W. L., & Majid, I. A. (2014). Socio-Cultural Factors and Intention towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Eur Asian Journal of Business and Economics, 7(13), 145–156.
Kotabe, M., Jiang, C., Murray, J. (2017). Examining complementary effects of political networking capability with absorptive capacity on EMFs’ innovative performance. Journal of Management, 43(4): 1131–1156.
Kuckertz, A. and Wagner, M. (2010). The Influence of Sustainability Orientation on Entrepreneurial Intentions: Investigating the Role of Business Experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 524-539.
Lipset, S.M., (2000). Values and entrepreneurship in the Americas. In: Swedberg, R. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View
Majid?I. & Koe, W.-L. (2012). Sustainable Entrepreneurship (SE): A Revised Model Based on Triple Bottom Line (TBL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 293– 310.
Meek, W.R., Pacheco, D.F. and York, J.G. (2010). The Impact of Social Norms on Entrepreneurial Action: Evidence from the Environmental Entrepreneurship Context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493-509.
Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5): 779–790
Ministry of Economic Affairs, Shared Prosperity Vision 2030; Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2019.
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 796-812.
Munir, K. A. (2019). Challenging Institutional Theory’s Critical Credentials. https://doi.org/10.1177/263178771988 7975
O’Neill K.J., Gibbs D.C. (2014) Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector. Local Environ; 19:572–590.
O’Neill G.D. Jr., Hershauer, J.C. and Golden, J.S. (2009). The Cultural Context of Sustainability Entrepreneurship. Green Management International, 55, 33-46.
Ostrom, E., (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3), 137–158
Rasi, R.Z.R.M., Abdekhodaee, A. and Nagarajah, R. (2010). Understanding Drivers for Environmental Practices in SMEs: A Critical Review. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE ICMIT.
Saji, B.S. (2004). Workforce diversity, temporal dimensions and team performance. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 40-59. https://doi-org.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/10.1108/13527600 410797873
Sarango-Lalangui, P., Santos, J.L.S. and Hormiga, E. (2018). The development of sustainable entrepreneurship research field. Sustainability, 10(6), available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062005
Schwartz, M.S. (2009). Beyond the Bottom Line: A Shifting Paradigm for Business? In Doing Well and Good: The Human Face of the New Capitalism (Friedland, J. ed.), pp. 131-147. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
Schick, H., Marxen, S., Freimann, J. (2002). Sustainability Issues for Start-up Entrepreneurs. Greener Management International, (38).
Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great minds in management: The process of theory development, 37(2), 460-484.
Schaper, M. (2002). The challenge of environmental responsibility and sustainable development: Implications for SME and entrepreneurship academics. Radical changes in the world: Will SMEs soar or crash, 541-553.
Schlange, L. E. (2006). What drives sustainable entrepreneurs? In Proceedings of the Applied Business and Entrepreneurship Association International (ABEAI) Conference (pp. 1-11).
Sengupta, S. (2021). The relevance of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for companies. Seventeen Goals Magazin. https://www.17goalsmagazin.de/en/the-relevance-of-the-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-for-companies/
Smith, P.A.C. and Sharicz, C. (2011). The Shift Needed for Sustainability. The Learning Organization, 18(1), 73-8 6.
Spence, C., Levitan, C., Shankar, M. & Zampini, M. (2010). Does Food Color Influence Taste and Flavor Perception in Humans? Chemosensory Perception, 3, 68-84.
Tankard, M. & Paluck, E.L. (2016) Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change. Soc. Issues Policy Rev, 10,181–211.
Tilley, F. and Young, W. (2009). Sustainability Entrepreneurs: Could They Be the True Wealth Generators of the Future? Green Management International, 55, 79-92.
Tilley, F., Hooper, P., & Walley, L. (2003). Sustainability and competitiveness: are there mutual advantages for SMEs? University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Trompenaars, E: (1993), Riding the Waves of Culture (Economist Books, U.K.).
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behavior and the role of confidence and values. Ecological economics, 64(3), 542-553.
Yaacob, M.R., (2010). A Preliminary Study of Green Micro-entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(3), 81-88.
Yoon, E. and Tello, S. (2009). Drivers of Sustainable Innovation: Exploratory Views and Corporate Strategies. Seoul Journal of Business, 15(2), 85-115.
Zachary, R.K. and Mishra, C.S. (2011). The Future of Entrepreneurship Research: Calling All Researchers. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(1), 1-13.
Zhai, Q., & Su, J. (2019). A perfect couple? Institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Chinese Management Studies, 13(3), 616–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2017-0194
Zhao, X., Li, H., & Rauch, A. (2012). Cross-country differences in entrepreneurial activity: The role of cultural practice and national wealth. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 6(4), 447-474.
Zhang, F., Xiao, F. & Yu, P. (2024). A Model of Sustainable Development in Economic, Social, and Environmental Aspects: The Role of Social Capital in China. Environmental Research Communications. 6. 10.1088/2515-7620/ad37a8.
Copyright (c) 2024 Noorain Mohd Nordin, Wei-Loon Koe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.