Assessing the Impact of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports on Government Accountability

  • Nor 'Asyiqin Binti Abu University Technology Mara, Malaysia
  • Ainol Sarina Ahmad Zazili University Technology Mara, Malaysia
  • Enylina Nordin Nordin University Technology Mara, Malaysia
  • Wan Shafizah Hussain University Technology Mara, Malaysia
  • Siti Aisyah Basri University Technology Mara, Malaysia
Keywords: public accounts committee, government, accountability, transparency, parliament

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in Malaysia to enrich the understanding of its role in promoting governmental accountability. Through an extensive content analysis of the PAC reports spanning from 2019 to 2022 sourced from the Official Web of Parliament PAC, issues raised by the PAC were categorized into key improvement areas. Findings unveiled 104 flagged issues, with 68 addressed effectively, while 29 remained unresolved despite agreements for action and 7 lacking government response. The government's consideration of 97 out of 104 issues, reflecting a response rate exceeding 90%, underscored the PAC's pivotal role in fostering accountability. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the prevailing issues identified in PAC reports and their current resolution status. It offers crucial insights for legislators to enhance the efficacy of their oversight procedures. Additionally, it provides empirical data on the impact of legislative oversight on governmental operations. The findings highlight the PAC's capacity to instigate positive reforms within government agencies, thereby enhancing transparency and promoting accountable governance. Future research should explore how the composition of the PAC committees influences issue resolution and government responses, while further investigations are recommended to evaluate the effects of the PAC recommendations on governmental practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Z. Z., Sori, Z. M., Daud, Z. M., & Senik, R. (2019). Perceived Public Accounts Committee Independence: The Malaysian Case. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 9 (2), 209-220.

Batumalai, M., Zakaria, M., Majid, W. Z., & Nadeson, P. S. (2022). An investigation of audit expectation gap in the Malaysian public sector. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS) 20(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2022-20.1.0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2022-20.1.0011

Benton, M., & Russell, M. (2012). Assessing the impact of parliamentary oversight committees: The select committees in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(4), 772-797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss009

Cîmpan, M., P?curaru-Ionescu, C., & Borlea, S. N. (2023). The value of public audit - theories and empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Studies, 8(14), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.55654/jfs.2023.8.14.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55654/JFS.2023.8.14.2

Daud, Z. M., & Fraser, I. (2015). Auditors’ and PAC Members’ Views on Performance Auditing Practices in Malaysia: A Qualitative Approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(S), 89-98.

Elston, T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Implementing Public Accounts Committee Recommendations: Evidence from The UK Government’s ‘Progress Reports’ Since 2012. Parliamentary Affairs, 76(3), 662-693. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab068

Lateef, S. A., Rashid, N., Farouk, A. U., & Olanipekun, W. D. (2021). Does the independence of supreme audit institutions matter in good governance? An insight from Nigeria's auditor general for the Federation. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(4), 712-721. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090417

MD Zabri, M.Z. (2024, February 3). Charting a new course against corruption in Malaysia. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2024/02/03/charting-a-new-course-against-corruption-in-malaysia-mohd-zaidi-md-zabri/116114 [27 June 2024]

Padlee, S. F. (2021). The Practice of Public Accounts Committee in the Parliament of Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 159-174.

Parliament of Malaysia (2017). Peranan PAC dalam Meningkatkan Tadbir Urus Awam (2017). https://parlimen.gov.my/pac/review/docs-155-189.pdf [16 August 2023]

Parliament of Malaysia, Standing order (2018). https://www.parlimen.gov.my/images/webuser/peraturan_mesyuarat/PMDR-eng.pdf [16 August 2023]

Parliament of Malaysia, The Public Accounts Committee Report (2019-2022). https://www.parlimen.gov.my/pac/laporan-pac.html?&lang=en [16 August 2023]

Saleh, Z., & Abu Hasan, H. (2015). Making Governments Accountable: The Role of Public Accounts Committees and National Audit Offices. Oxford, UK: Routledge, pp. 209-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768618-12

SPRM (n.d.). National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2024-2028. https://www.sprm.gov.my/admin/uploads_publication/strategi-pembanterasan-rasuah-nasional-2024-2028--en-08052024.pdf [27 June 2024]

Wehner, J. (2002). Best practices of public accounts committees. Handbook for Public Accounts Committees, Association of Public Accounts Committees. Cape Town: IDASA.

Yaakob, A. F., Kadir, N. A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Accountability from the Perspective of Malaysian Governance. Journal of Politics and Laws, 2(3), 48-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v2n3p48

Zakuan, U. A. A. (2022). Substantive Representation of Women in Malaysian Legislatures: Parliament (Dewan Rakyat) and State Assemblies. In Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments (pp. 117-138). Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275961-8

Published
2024-07-17
How to Cite
Binti Abu, N. ’Asyiqin, Ahmad Zazili, A. S., Nordin, E. N., Hussain, W. S., & Basri, S. A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports on Government Accountability. Information Management and Business Review, 16(2(I), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I).3813
Section
Research Paper