A Conceptual Framework for the Individual Factors Fostering the Innovative Work Behaviour of STEM Teachers
Keywords:
Innovative Work Behaviour, Individual Factors, Self Determination Theory, STEM Teachers, Teachers, Education
Abstract
This article explores the factors influencing innovative work behavior (IWB) among academics in the field of education, with a specific focus on STEM teachers. The inquiry adopts the conceptual framework of self-determination theory. A literature review methodology is employed, encompassing an examination of journals, conference papers, theses, and a conceptual approach. Variables in this analysis are delineated and measured in accordance with previous research and recommendations. The findings of this study highlight the significance of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and job engagement as pivotal characteristics contributing to the cultivation of innovative work behavior among employees. The study's limitations stem from its reliance on a literature review and the analysis of prior research findings to construct a conceptual framework concerning STEM teachers' innovative work behavior. Future empirical research is recommended to comprehensively elucidate additional factors fostering innovative work behavior. The research findings corroborate earlier studies, suggesting that to bolster Malaysia's standing in the Global Innovation Index (GII) and, indirectly, to advance the goals of the NSTIP 2021-2030 aimed at cultivating a technologically proficient society, educational administrators in Malaysia should actively foster teachers' engagement in innovative work behavior activities, leveraging their competencies and strengths. This study provides valuable insights into the individual factors influencing teachers' propensity for innovative work behavior and their potential to enhance Malaysia's education system.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z. & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fractions. Asian Soc. Sci., 11, 11.
Abdullatif, T. N., Johari, H. B. & Adnan, Z. bt. (2016). The impact of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior moderating by quality culture. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(17), 126–131.
Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2017). Science Outlook 2017: Unlocking the Future, Kuala Lumpur, Academy of Sciences Malaysia.
Amelia, A. & Lilia, H. (2019). The challenge of integrating stem education into the Malaysian curriculum. Education Discourse Seminar, 2019.
Anzarwati, E. (2021). The influence of transformational leadership, distributive justice, and intrinsic motivation on innovative work behavior. JCOMENT (Journal of Community Empowerment), 2(2), 26-38.
Arasli, H. & Alphun, C. (2019, July). The impact of intrinsic motivation in the relationship between transcendental leadership and work engagement: evidence from the hotel industry. In 9th Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Marketing and Management Conference (P. 389).
Avsec, S. & Savec, V. F. (2021). Predictive Modelling of Pre-Service Science and Technology Teachers' Innovative Behaviour. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 171-183.
Awang-Hashim, R., Thaliah, R. & Kaur, A. (2017). A cultural insight into the development of teacher autonomy support scale A self-determination theory perspective. Journal for Multicultural Education, 11(4).
Baharin, N. L., Hanafi, W. N. W., Rahman Zahari, A., Fadzline Muhammad Tamyez, P., Azlinna Azizan, N. & Esa, E. (2019). Work readiness skills and career self-efficacy: A case of Malaysian private university. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 100.
Bawuro, F. A., Shamsuddin, A. L. I. N. A., Wahab, E., Adenuga, K. I. & Ndaghu, J. T. (2019). Motivational mechanisms on teachers’ innovative behaviour-a systematic review approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 239-245.
Becker, K. & dan Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 2(10), 862- 875.
Bhattarai, G. & Budhathoki, B. P. (2023). Impact of person-environment fit on innovative work behavior: Mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 396-407.
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M. & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behavior: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253.
Brodhag, C. (2013). Research universities, technology transfer, and job creation: What infrastructure, for what training? Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 388-404.
Caprile, M., Palmen, R., Sanz, P. & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labor market. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 53, 1689–1699.
Charli, C. O., Masnum, A., Hidayat, R., Menhard, M. & Hartoyo, B. (2023). interpretation innovative work behavior and transformational leadership: analysis work engagement and work environment on Dinas Pariwisata Kota Padang. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 3(6), 318-333.
Cherry, S. (2022). What is self-determination theory? how self-determination influences motivation. The Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-2795387 on 15th February 2024
Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M. & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st-century skills, and stem careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated stem education. Educ. Sci., 11, 737.
De Jong, J. P. & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-Determination Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(2011), 416-433.
Docherty, A., Warkentin, P., Borgen, J., Garthe, K., Fischer, K. L. & Najjar, R. H. (2018). Enhancing student engagement: Innovative strategies for intentional learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(6), 470-474.
Dur, R. & Zoutenbier, R. (2015). Intrinsic motivations of public sector employees: evidence for Germany. German Economic Review, 16(3), 343-366.
Georgellis, Y., Iossa, E. & Tabvuma, V. (2010). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473-493.
Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J. & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior as a Function of Self-Efficacy, Burnout, and Irrational Beliefs: A Structural Equation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 403-418.
Grant, A. M. & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy Of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
Hakimian, F., Farid, H., Ismail, M. N. & Nair, P. K. (2016). Importance of commitment in encouraging employees’ innovative behavior. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 70–83.
Haseeb, A. S. M. A. (2018). Higher education in the era of IR 4. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2018/01/323591/higher-education-era-ir-40
Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A. & Ibrahim, N. F. (2022). Validating the Component of e-learning antecedents, digital readiness and usage behavior towards e-learning performance: A pilot study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 178-194.
Hong, J., Feng, B., Wu, Y. & Wang, L. (2016). Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries? Technovation, 57, 4-13.
Hosseini, S. & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364.
Ibus, S., Wahab, E. & Ismail, F. (2020). How to promote innovative work behavior among academics. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 103-116.
Johari, A., Abdul Wahat, N. W. & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2021). Innovative work behavior among teachers in Malaysia: The effects of teamwork, principal support, and humor. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 7(2), 72-84.
Karadeniz, B., Erzurum, E., Akcan, A. F. & Zaim, S. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 121(1), 136-144.
Kaur, G. & Rahmadani, V. G. (2023). Job crafting and innovative behavior among hospitality workers: The moderation effect of work engagement. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 80-89.
Kearney, M., Burden, K. & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers’ adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Comput. Educ., 80, 48–57.
Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Int. J. STEM Educ., 3, 11.
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M. & Martens, R. (2017). Teachers’ innovative behavior: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 19–39.
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M. & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behavior: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769-782.
Kong, D., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y. & Xue, L. (2017). Using the data mining method to assess the innovation gap: A case of industrial robotics in a catching-up country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 80-97.
Kundu, A. & Roy, D. D. (2016). Innovative work behavior of school teachers: role of belief for innovation and personality patterns. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 5(1).
Kundu, A. & Roy, D. D. (2023). How do teachers innovate? Role of efficacy for innovation and school climate perception. Psychology in the Schools, 60(12), 4885-4903.
Lee, S. Y. & Park, J. W. (2023). The effects of SME employees’ learning support environment on innovative work behavior: Focusing on the mediating roles of self-efficacy and employee engagement. Han'gug HRD Yeon'gu, 18(1), 67-96.
Li, K., Wijaya, T. T., Chen, X. & Harahap, M. S. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting elementary mathematics teachers’ innovative behavior: an integration of social cognitive theory. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2108.
Lukes, M. & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136-158.
Messman, A., Kryzaniak, S. M., Alden, S., Pasirstein, M. J. & Chan, T. M. (2018). Recommendations for the development and implementation of residents as teachers curriculum. Cureus, 10(7).
Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation. (2022). List of Malaysian Government Policies. Retrieved from https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/sti/sti-policies/national-sciencetechnology-and-innovation-policy.
Mirzajani, H., Mahmud, R., Fauzi Mohd Ayub, A. & Wong, S. L. (2016). Teachers’ acceptance of ICT and its integration in the classroom. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 26-40.
Namono, R., Kemboi, A. & Chepkwony, J. (2021). Enhancing innovative work behavior in higher institutions of learning: the role of hope. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 632-643.
Nemeržitski, S., Loogma, K., Heinla, E. & Eisenschmidt, E. (2013). Constructing a model of teachers’ innovative behavior in school environment. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract, 19(4), 398–418.
Ng, O. L. & Park, M. (2021). Using an enhanced video-engagement innovation to support STEM teachers’ professional development in technology-based instruction. Educ. Technol. Soc. 24(4), 193–204.
Ong, E., Govindasamy, D., Swaran Singh, C., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N., Borhan, M. T. & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1).
Orindah, F. A. (2014). Influence of Organizational Culture on Teachers’ job Commitment in public primary schools in ndhiwa sub-county, Kenya.
Ozer, E. A. & Akgun, O. E. (2015). The effects of irrational beliefs on academic motivation and academic self-efficacy of candidate teachers of computer and instructional technologies education department. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 197, 1287–1292.
Parthasarathy, J. & Premalatha, T. (2017). Impact of Collective Efficacy and self-efficacy on the innovative work behavior of teachers in the Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 5(1).
Prieto, I. M. & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C. & e Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promotes employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437.
Rifandi, W. & Rahmi, R. L. Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1317, 12208.
Saeed, B., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A. & Shah, S. (2019). Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Economic Research, 32(1), 254-281.
Sari, D. K., Christian, F. & Yudiarso, A. (2021). Work engagement and innovative work behavior: Meta-analysis study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPSYCHE 2020), 530, 53, 359-366. Atlantis Press.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Schunk, D. H. & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Shamsudin, A. & Majid, R. A. (2018). Method of Identification in Gifted and Talented Students. Available at SSRN 3208473.
Shumow, L. & Schmidt, J. A. (2013), Enhancing Adolescents’ Motivation for Science, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Singh, M. & Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior: A dimensional analysis with job involvement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 127–137.
Siregar, Z. M. E., Suryana, E. A. & Senen, S. H. (2019). Factors influencing innovative work behavior: an individual factors perspective. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 324-327.
Stein, M. K. & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171-187.
Susanti, S. & Ardi, A. (2022). The effect of digital transformational leadership, and creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior mediated by perceived organizational support. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(8), 3111-3120.
Thomas, B. & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian, and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. Int. J. Educ. Dev., 45, 42–53.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T. & Vermeulen, M. (2015), Toward a model of explaining teachers' innovative behavior: a literature review, Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471.
Tims, M., B. Bakker, A. & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490-507.
Turabik, T. & Baskan, G. A. (2015). The importance of motivation theories in terms of education systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1055-1063.
Usma, J. & Frodden, C. (2003). Promoting Teacher Autonomy through Educational Innovation. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje Y Cultura, 8(4), 101–132.
Kusmaryani, E. R. (2022). Successful schools: the role of teachers’ work innovative behavior. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications.
Warren, J. M. & Gerler, J. E. R. (2013). Effects of school counsellors’ cognitive behavioral consultation on irrational and efficacy beliefs of elementary school teachers. Prof. Couns., 3, 6–15.
Widodo, W. & Mawarto, M. (2020). Investigating the role of innovative behavior in mediating the effect of transformational leadership and talent management on performance. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2175-2182.
Zainal, M. A. & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative behavior: A systematic review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869.
Zainal, S. R. M. & Lata, L. (2021). Enhancing innovative work behavior: the role of servant leadership and creative self-efficacy. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 29(2), 33-51.
Zammit, E., Rizzo, A. & Aquilina, R. (2023). Innovative practices amongst academics working within a VET institution: A grounded theory approach. MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice, 7(1), 211-226.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S. & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Abdullatif, T. N., Johari, H. B. & Adnan, Z. bt. (2016). The impact of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior moderating by quality culture. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(17), 126–131.
Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2017). Science Outlook 2017: Unlocking the Future, Kuala Lumpur, Academy of Sciences Malaysia.
Amelia, A. & Lilia, H. (2019). The challenge of integrating stem education into the Malaysian curriculum. Education Discourse Seminar, 2019.
Anzarwati, E. (2021). The influence of transformational leadership, distributive justice, and intrinsic motivation on innovative work behavior. JCOMENT (Journal of Community Empowerment), 2(2), 26-38.
Arasli, H. & Alphun, C. (2019, July). The impact of intrinsic motivation in the relationship between transcendental leadership and work engagement: evidence from the hotel industry. In 9th Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Marketing and Management Conference (P. 389).
Avsec, S. & Savec, V. F. (2021). Predictive Modelling of Pre-Service Science and Technology Teachers' Innovative Behaviour. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 171-183.
Awang-Hashim, R., Thaliah, R. & Kaur, A. (2017). A cultural insight into the development of teacher autonomy support scale A self-determination theory perspective. Journal for Multicultural Education, 11(4).
Baharin, N. L., Hanafi, W. N. W., Rahman Zahari, A., Fadzline Muhammad Tamyez, P., Azlinna Azizan, N. & Esa, E. (2019). Work readiness skills and career self-efficacy: A case of Malaysian private university. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 100.
Bawuro, F. A., Shamsuddin, A. L. I. N. A., Wahab, E., Adenuga, K. I. & Ndaghu, J. T. (2019). Motivational mechanisms on teachers’ innovative behaviour-a systematic review approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 239-245.
Becker, K. & dan Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 2(10), 862- 875.
Bhattarai, G. & Budhathoki, B. P. (2023). Impact of person-environment fit on innovative work behavior: Mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 396-407.
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M. & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behavior: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253.
Brodhag, C. (2013). Research universities, technology transfer, and job creation: What infrastructure, for what training? Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 388-404.
Caprile, M., Palmen, R., Sanz, P. & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labor market. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 53, 1689–1699.
Charli, C. O., Masnum, A., Hidayat, R., Menhard, M. & Hartoyo, B. (2023). interpretation innovative work behavior and transformational leadership: analysis work engagement and work environment on Dinas Pariwisata Kota Padang. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 3(6), 318-333.
Cherry, S. (2022). What is self-determination theory? how self-determination influences motivation. The Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-2795387 on 15th February 2024
Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M. & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st-century skills, and stem careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated stem education. Educ. Sci., 11, 737.
De Jong, J. P. & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-Determination Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(2011), 416-433.
Docherty, A., Warkentin, P., Borgen, J., Garthe, K., Fischer, K. L. & Najjar, R. H. (2018). Enhancing student engagement: Innovative strategies for intentional learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(6), 470-474.
Dur, R. & Zoutenbier, R. (2015). Intrinsic motivations of public sector employees: evidence for Germany. German Economic Review, 16(3), 343-366.
Georgellis, Y., Iossa, E. & Tabvuma, V. (2010). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473-493.
Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J. & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior as a Function of Self-Efficacy, Burnout, and Irrational Beliefs: A Structural Equation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 403-418.
Grant, A. M. & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy Of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
Hakimian, F., Farid, H., Ismail, M. N. & Nair, P. K. (2016). Importance of commitment in encouraging employees’ innovative behavior. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 70–83.
Haseeb, A. S. M. A. (2018). Higher education in the era of IR 4. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2018/01/323591/higher-education-era-ir-40
Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A. & Ibrahim, N. F. (2022). Validating the Component of e-learning antecedents, digital readiness and usage behavior towards e-learning performance: A pilot study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 178-194.
Hong, J., Feng, B., Wu, Y. & Wang, L. (2016). Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries? Technovation, 57, 4-13.
Hosseini, S. & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364.
Ibus, S., Wahab, E. & Ismail, F. (2020). How to promote innovative work behavior among academics. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 103-116.
Johari, A., Abdul Wahat, N. W. & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2021). Innovative work behavior among teachers in Malaysia: The effects of teamwork, principal support, and humor. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 7(2), 72-84.
Karadeniz, B., Erzurum, E., Akcan, A. F. & Zaim, S. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 121(1), 136-144.
Kaur, G. & Rahmadani, V. G. (2023). Job crafting and innovative behavior among hospitality workers: The moderation effect of work engagement. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 80-89.
Kearney, M., Burden, K. & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers’ adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Comput. Educ., 80, 48–57.
Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Int. J. STEM Educ., 3, 11.
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M. & Martens, R. (2017). Teachers’ innovative behavior: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 19–39.
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M. & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behavior: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769-782.
Kong, D., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y. & Xue, L. (2017). Using the data mining method to assess the innovation gap: A case of industrial robotics in a catching-up country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 80-97.
Kundu, A. & Roy, D. D. (2016). Innovative work behavior of school teachers: role of belief for innovation and personality patterns. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 5(1).
Kundu, A. & Roy, D. D. (2023). How do teachers innovate? Role of efficacy for innovation and school climate perception. Psychology in the Schools, 60(12), 4885-4903.
Lee, S. Y. & Park, J. W. (2023). The effects of SME employees’ learning support environment on innovative work behavior: Focusing on the mediating roles of self-efficacy and employee engagement. Han'gug HRD Yeon'gu, 18(1), 67-96.
Li, K., Wijaya, T. T., Chen, X. & Harahap, M. S. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting elementary mathematics teachers’ innovative behavior: an integration of social cognitive theory. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2108.
Lukes, M. & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136-158.
Messman, A., Kryzaniak, S. M., Alden, S., Pasirstein, M. J. & Chan, T. M. (2018). Recommendations for the development and implementation of residents as teachers curriculum. Cureus, 10(7).
Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation. (2022). List of Malaysian Government Policies. Retrieved from https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/sti/sti-policies/national-sciencetechnology-and-innovation-policy.
Mirzajani, H., Mahmud, R., Fauzi Mohd Ayub, A. & Wong, S. L. (2016). Teachers’ acceptance of ICT and its integration in the classroom. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 26-40.
Namono, R., Kemboi, A. & Chepkwony, J. (2021). Enhancing innovative work behavior in higher institutions of learning: the role of hope. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 632-643.
Nemeržitski, S., Loogma, K., Heinla, E. & Eisenschmidt, E. (2013). Constructing a model of teachers’ innovative behavior in school environment. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract, 19(4), 398–418.
Ng, O. L. & Park, M. (2021). Using an enhanced video-engagement innovation to support STEM teachers’ professional development in technology-based instruction. Educ. Technol. Soc. 24(4), 193–204.
Ong, E., Govindasamy, D., Swaran Singh, C., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N., Borhan, M. T. & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1).
Orindah, F. A. (2014). Influence of Organizational Culture on Teachers’ job Commitment in public primary schools in ndhiwa sub-county, Kenya.
Ozer, E. A. & Akgun, O. E. (2015). The effects of irrational beliefs on academic motivation and academic self-efficacy of candidate teachers of computer and instructional technologies education department. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 197, 1287–1292.
Parthasarathy, J. & Premalatha, T. (2017). Impact of Collective Efficacy and self-efficacy on the innovative work behavior of teachers in the Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 5(1).
Prieto, I. M. & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C. & e Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promotes employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437.
Rifandi, W. & Rahmi, R. L. Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1317, 12208.
Saeed, B., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A. & Shah, S. (2019). Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Economic Research, 32(1), 254-281.
Sari, D. K., Christian, F. & Yudiarso, A. (2021). Work engagement and innovative work behavior: Meta-analysis study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPSYCHE 2020), 530, 53, 359-366. Atlantis Press.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Schunk, D. H. & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Shamsudin, A. & Majid, R. A. (2018). Method of Identification in Gifted and Talented Students. Available at SSRN 3208473.
Shumow, L. & Schmidt, J. A. (2013), Enhancing Adolescents’ Motivation for Science, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Singh, M. & Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior: A dimensional analysis with job involvement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 127–137.
Siregar, Z. M. E., Suryana, E. A. & Senen, S. H. (2019). Factors influencing innovative work behavior: an individual factors perspective. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 324-327.
Stein, M. K. & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171-187.
Susanti, S. & Ardi, A. (2022). The effect of digital transformational leadership, and creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior mediated by perceived organizational support. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(8), 3111-3120.
Thomas, B. & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian, and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. Int. J. Educ. Dev., 45, 42–53.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T. & Vermeulen, M. (2015), Toward a model of explaining teachers' innovative behavior: a literature review, Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471.
Tims, M., B. Bakker, A. & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490-507.
Turabik, T. & Baskan, G. A. (2015). The importance of motivation theories in terms of education systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1055-1063.
Usma, J. & Frodden, C. (2003). Promoting Teacher Autonomy through Educational Innovation. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje Y Cultura, 8(4), 101–132.
Kusmaryani, E. R. (2022). Successful schools: the role of teachers’ work innovative behavior. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications.
Warren, J. M. & Gerler, J. E. R. (2013). Effects of school counsellors’ cognitive behavioral consultation on irrational and efficacy beliefs of elementary school teachers. Prof. Couns., 3, 6–15.
Widodo, W. & Mawarto, M. (2020). Investigating the role of innovative behavior in mediating the effect of transformational leadership and talent management on performance. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2175-2182.
Zainal, M. A. & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative behavior: A systematic review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869.
Zainal, S. R. M. & Lata, L. (2021). Enhancing innovative work behavior: the role of servant leadership and creative self-efficacy. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 29(2), 33-51.
Zammit, E., Rizzo, A. & Aquilina, R. (2023). Innovative practices amongst academics working within a VET institution: A grounded theory approach. MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice, 7(1), 211-226.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S. & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Published
2024-04-02
How to Cite
Daud, S. R., Rahim, A., Abdullah, M. S., Sehat, N. S., Sarkam, S. F., Abas, N., & Suhaime, I. L. (2024). A Conceptual Framework for the Individual Factors Fostering the Innovative Work Behaviour of STEM Teachers. Information Management and Business Review, 16(1(I), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i1(I).3709
Issue
Section
Research Paper
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Rohana Daud, Azira Rahim, Muhammad Syukri Abdullah, Nani Shuhada Sehat, Saida Farhanah Sarkam, Norlela Abas, Intan Liana Suhaime
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
