A Study on the Matching Efficiency of Malaysia's Labor Market during the Covid-19 Pandemic using the DEA-Malmquist Productivity Index

  • Salwaty Jamaludin UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam
  • Kamarul Hidayah Abdul Hamid UiTM Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Rembau
  • Nazurah Abdul Malek UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam
  • Muhammad Zaheer Khan Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Science
  • Sharul Shahida Shakrein Safian UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam
  • Norhasimah Shaharuddin UiTM Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam
Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis; Malmquist Productivity Index, Labor market efficiency

Abstract

This paper analyses the matching efficiency of the Malaysian labor market during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing Malmquist DEA, the results indicate that from January 2020 to December 2021, the average total factor productivity change is 0.967. TFPCH declined and had an average growth rate of -3.3% during the sample period. Decomposing TFPCH into technical change (TECHCH) and efficiency change (EFFCH), low TECHCH, with an average growth rate of -10.2%, is the main reason why TFPCH is far from the effective frontier. The TFPCH of the mining and quarrying industry is the highest, with an average growth of 18.7%. The TFPCH of both manufacturing and construction industries are the lowest with average annual growths of -1.7% and -7.6% respectively. Overall, it can be concluded that one of the main drivers to enhance the matching efficiency of the labor market is technical change or technological progress. One way is to strengthen online platforms that can help the firm or industry to match job vacancies to job seekers, even during economic shocks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamowicz, M. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic as a Change Factor in the Labor Market in Poland. Sustainability, 14(15), 9197.
Albaek, K. & Hansen, H. (2004). The rise in Danish unemployment: Reallocation or mismatch? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), 515-536.
Arpaia, A., Kiss, A. & Turrini, A. (2014). Is unemployment structural or cyclical? Main features of job matching in the EU after the crisis. IZA Policy Paper. No. 91.
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2021). Structural Labor Market Issues in the Post-COVID-19 World. Outlook and Policy in 2021, Economic and Monetary Review 2020, 90-104.
Banker, R. D. & Datar, S. M. (1989). Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 21-39.
Borjas George J. (2015). Labor Economics. (3rd edition). McGraw Hill.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(6), 1393-1414.
Cheremukhin, A. A. & Restrepo-Echavarria, P. (2014). The labor wedge is a matching friction. European Economic Review, 68, 71-92.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. & Tone, K. (2001). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Journal-operational Research Society, 52(12), 1408-1409.
Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., Postel?Vinay, F. & Xu, X. (2020). The challenges for labor market policy during the Covid?19 pandemic. Fiscal Studies, 41(2), 371-382.
Du, Y. & Seo, W. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Efficiency of R&D Activities of Universities in China by Region Using DEA–Malmquist. Sustainability, 14(16), 10433.
Erken, H., van Loon, E. & Verbeek, W. (2015). Mismatch on the Dutch labor market in the Great Recession. De Economist, 163(4), 435-459.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. & Roos, P. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85–101.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 8(1), 66-83.
Habibullah, M. S., Saari, M. Y., Din, B. H., Safuan, S. & Utit, C. (2021). Labor market reactions to lockdown measures during the Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia: An Empirical Note. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 55(1), 39-49.
Hall, R. E. & Schulhofer-Wohl, S. (2018). Measuring job-finding rates and matching efficiency with heterogeneous job-seekers. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(1), 1-32.
Hynninen, S. M., Kangasharju, A. & Pehkonen, J. (2009). Matching inefficiencies, regional disparities, and unemployment. Labor, 23(3), 481-506.
International Labor Organization (ILO). (2020a). COVID-19 Pandemic in the World of Work. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Second edition. Updated estimates and analysis. 1-11.
International Labor Organization (ILO). (2020b). OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). COVID-19 and the retail sector: impact and policy responses. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-and-the-retail-sector-impact-and-policy-responses-371d7599/
International Labor Organization (ILO). (2021). ILO Sectorial Brief. Impact of COVID-19 on the construction sector. https://www.ilo.org/sector/Resources/publications/WCMS_767303/lang--en/index.htm
Ilmakunnas, P. & Pesola, H. (2003). Regional labor market matching functions and efficiency analysis. Labor, 17(3), 413-437.
Lemieux, T., Milligan, K., Schirle, T. & Skuterud, M. (2020). Initial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Canadian labor market. Canadian Public Policy, 46(S1), S55-S65.
Li, J., Zhang, J., Gong, L. & Miao, P. (2015). Research on the total factor productivity and decomposition of Chinese coastal marine economy: based on DEA-Malmquist index. Journal of Coastal Research, 73 (10073), 283-289.
Lim, B. F. Y. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Malaysia. Japan Labor Issues, 6(40), 37-44.
Ministry of Human Resources (MOHR). (2021). Common job loss reasons, Employment outlook 2021, Employment Information Analysis Services (EIAS).
Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). (2021). Manufacturing most affected industrial sector hit by Covid-19: MITI. https://www.mida.gov.my/mida-news/manufacturing-most-affected-industrial-sector-hit-by-covid-19-miti/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CData%20from%20 Department%20of%20Statistics,of%2029.8%25%20in%20May%202021
N?mec, D. (2015). Measuring inefficiency of the Czech labor market. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 197-220.
Nuradzimmah, D. & Arfa, Y. (2021, September 23). 37,415 MSMEs closed during MCO 3.0. The News Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/09/731825/37415-msmes-closed-during-mco-30
Rahman, A. A., Jasmin, A. F. & Schmillen, A. (2020). The vulnerability of jobs to Covid-19: The case of Malaysia. ISEAS Economics Working Paper No. 2020-09, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore
Said, R., Jamaludin, S., Ismail, N. W., Nor, N. M. & Yong, C. C. (2021). Measuring mismatch unemployment in the Malaysia labor market. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 14(3), 227-247.
Sheldon, G. M. (2003). The efficiency of public employment services: A nonparametric matching function analysis for Switzerland. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(1), 49-70.
Shibata, M. I. (2013). Is Labor Market Mismatch a Big Deal in Japan? International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 13-196.
Wall, H. J. & Zoega, G. (2002). The British Beveridge curve: A tale of ten regions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(3), 257-276.
Published
2023-11-09
How to Cite
Jamaludin, S., Abdul Hamid, K. H., Abdul Malek, N., Khan, M. Z., Shakrein Safian, S. S., & Shaharuddin, N. (2023). A Study on the Matching Efficiency of Malaysia’s Labor Market during the Covid-19 Pandemic using the DEA-Malmquist Productivity Index. Information Management and Business Review, 15(4(SI)I), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i4(SI)I.3572
Section
Research Paper