The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities on Firm’s Financial Performance

  • Siti Zaitun Saddam Faculty of Business and Management Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-0868
  • Nurhuda Nizar Faculty of Business and Management Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus
  • Nurul Azrin Ariffin Faculty of Business Management Universiti Teknologi MARA, Melaka Campus
  • Norazira Mohd Abas Faculty of Business and Management Universiti Teknologi MARA, Melaka Campus
Keywords: Firm’s Financial Performance, Dynamic Capabilities, ACE Market, GMM, RBV Theory

Abstract

Firms often face significant challenges to stay competitive in the present economic environment, thus, dynamic capabilities are vital as it is a substantial factor in accomplishing better business performance. This study involved yearly data of 62 firms in the ACE market that engaged with dynamic capabilities, the data was collected from the year 2012-2021. The data was gathered from the firm's annual report and has been analyzed using two-step GMM. Generally, the ACE market is consistently associated with inferior performance and capital compared to the main market. Hence, the market has the possibility of being delisted and affecting capital market performance. Therefore, this study includes dynamic capabilities in the ACE market to study the market’s performance. The results obtained are consistent with the theory, whereby changes in dynamic capabilities contributed to a positive return on the firm’s performance. However, the small capital nature of the ACE Market limits the investment in the dynamic capabilities. This study concluded that more priority to be given to the awareness of dynamic capabilities in the current competitive era. The result proved that the investment in the dynamic capabilities improved the performance of the Ace market even though some of the firms in the ACE market ignored dynamic capabilities due to capital constraints. Thus, policymakers should play their role in providing grants for the firms in the ACE Market to improve the investment in dynamic capabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, M., Abdulhamid, T. & Sohail, B. (2018). Predicting firm performance through resource-based framework. European Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 31-40.
Al-Hamadanya, R. I., Rasheeb, I. M. & Mohammed, M. D. (2020). A systematic review of literature on intellectual capital in the Gulf cooperation countries.
Alipour, M. (2011). The effect of intellectual capital on firm performance: An investigation of Iran insurance companies. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(1), 53-66.
Anwar, M., Khan, S. Z., & Khan, N. U. (2018a). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial strategy and new ventures performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. Business and Economic Review, 10(1), 63-93.
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J. & Fernandez, J. C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco-innovation in the firm: an approach from the dynamic capabilities theory, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494-1503.
Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
Bleady, A., Ali, A. H. Ibrahim, S. B. (2018). Dynamic capabilities theory: pinning down a shifting concept, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22 (2), 1-16
Buallay, A., Cummings, R. & Hamdan, A. (2019). Intellectual capital efficiency and bank performance. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(4), 672-694.
Chashmie, N. & Fadaee, M. (2016). Impact of financial performance and growth opportunities on success or failure of companies: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Marketing, Science and Research Branch, 5(2), 2-5.
Claver-Cortes, E., Zaragoza-Saez, P. & Gonzalez Illescas, M. (2018). Intellectual capital management: An approach to organizational practices in Ecuador. Intangible Capital, 14(2), 270.
Dadashinasab, M. & Sofian, S. (2014). The impact of intellectual capital on firm financial performance by moderating dynamic capability. Asian Social Science, 10(17), 93-100.
Duho, K. C. T. & Onumah, J. M. (2019). Bank diversification strategy and intellectual capital in Ghana: An empirical analysis. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(2), 246-259.
Dybvig, P. H. & Warachka, M. (2015). Tobin’s Q does not measure firm performance: Theory, empirics, and alternatives. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562444
Fatihudin, D. & Mochklas, M. (2018). How measuring financial performance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(6), 553-557.
Ibrahim, M. H. & Law, S. H. (2016). Institutional quality and CO2 emission–trade relations: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 84(2), 323–340.
Isa, M. (2019). Board characteristics, firms' specific factors and financial performance: Evidence from ACE Market in Bursa Malaysia. ASEAN Entrepreneurship Journal (AEJ), 5(2), 20-26.
Kaawaase, T. K., Bananuka, J., Peter Kwizina, T. & Nabaweesi, J. (2020). Intellectual capital and performance of small and medium audit practices. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(2), 165-189.
Karna, A., Richter, A. & Riesenkampff, E. (2016). Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities–financial performance relationship: A meta?analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1154-1173.
Makkonen, H., Pohjola, M., Olkkonen, R. & Koponen, A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2707-2719.
Masa'deh, R. E., Tayeh, M., Jarrah, I. & Tarhini, A. (2015). Accounting vs. market-based measures of firm performance related to information technology investments. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 129-145.
Naz, F. & Ijaz, F. (2016). Financial performance of firms: Evidence from Pakistan cement industry. Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 62-94.
Pervan, M., Curak, M. & Pavic Kramaric, T. (2018). The influence of industry characteristics and dynamic capabilities on firms’ profitability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1-19.
Pundziene, A., Nikou, S. & Bouwman, H. (2022). The nexus between dynamic capabilities and competitive firm performance: the mediating role of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 152-177.
Rehman, K. U. & Saeed, Z. (2015). Impact of dynamic capabilities on firm performance: Moderating role of organizational competencies. Sukkur IBA Journal of Management and Business, 2(2), 18-40.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
Samiloglu, F., Oztop, A. O. & Kahraman, Y. E. (2017). The determinants of firm financial performance: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST). IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(6), 62-67.
Seo, K., Woo, L., Mun, S. G. & Soh, J. (2021). The asset-light business model and firm performance in complex and dynamic environments: The dynamic capabilities view. Tourism Management, 85, 104311.
Singh, B. & Rao, M. K. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 129-149.
Shinozaki, S. (2014). Capital Market Financing for SMEs: A Growing Need in Emerging Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration. Document Number).
Shari, W. (2019). Survival of the Malaysian initial public offerings. Management Science Letters, 9(4), 607-620.
Soewarno, N. & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Measures that matter: An empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 1085-1106.
Teece, D. J. (1997). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Tiwari, R. (2022). Nexus between intellectual capital and profitability with interaction effects: panel data evidence from the Indian healthcare industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(3), 588-616.
Tran, N. P., Van Loan, T. H. & Vo Duc, H. (2020). The nexus between corporate governance and intellectual capital in Vietnam. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(5), 637-650.
Wendra, W., Sule, E. T., Joeliaty, J. & Azis, Y. (2019). Exploring dynamic capabilities, intellectual capital and innovation performance relationship: Evidence from the garment manufacturing. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 123-136.
Wilden, R. & Gudergan, S. (2017). Service-dominant orientation, dynamic capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 808-832.
Xu, J. & Li, J. (2022). The interrelationship between intellectual capital and firm performance: evidence from China's manufacturing sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 313-341.
Xu, J. & Wang, B. (2019). Intellectual capital performance of the textile industry in emerging markets: A comparison with China and South Korea. Sustainability, 11(8), 2354.
Yao, H., Haris, M., Tariq, G., Javaid, H. M. & Khan, M. A. (2019). Intellectual capital, profitability, and productivity: Evidence from Pakistani financial institutions. Sustainability, 11(14).
Zhang, H. F. (2021). Iterative GMM for partially linear single-index models with partly endogenous regressors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 156, 107145.
Published
2023-05-11
How to Cite
Saddam, S. Z., Nizar, N., Ariffin, N. A., & Mohd Abas, N. (2023). The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities on Firm’s Financial Performance. Information Management and Business Review, 15(1(I)SI), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i1(I)SI.3388
Section
Research Paper