A Review of the Business Management Capability and Adaptability among Malaysian Contractors in the SCORE Program

  • Natasha Dzulkalnine Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam
  • Zalina Mat Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia
  • Mhd Jumain Mapplati Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Sunway Putra Tower
  • Norfadzilah Abd. Razak Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam
  • Syarifah Mastura Syed Abu Bakar Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam
Keywords: Malaysian Contractor, Contractor’s Capability, Business Performance, Financial Management, SCORE, assessment, construction sector.

Abstract

The selection of contractors for the project is one of the important tasks faced by the client such as developers and government agencies. To ensure that the client has selected a reliable contractor which has a good previous record, the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia has established one program named SCORE by assessing seven (7) scopes of assessment which are business performance, financial capability, technical capability, project management, procurement management, best practices, and management ability. Thus, this study was done to assess the level of capability and adaptability of Malaysian contractors in the business management aspect (Scope 1). This study adopted a mixed methodology involving quantitative through secondary data and qualitative research methods through interviews. The data collected for this study is through secondary data from CIDB’S database which cover from the year 2017 until 2021. Besides that, a series of interview sessions were done to find out further suggestions for the improvement of Malaysian contractors. The findings have shown that business performance among Malaysian contractors is one of the lowest scores as compared to other scopes. Thus, this study has proposed several suggestions to increase the performance of Malaysian contractors, especially in business performance such as holding awareness programs and coaching programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alnsour, M., Zeidan, A., Al Quwaider, B., Alkubaisi, A., Alreqeb, R. & Bader, M. (2023). Developing sustainability assessment indicators for measuring contractor’s performance during the construction phase of construction projects in Jordan. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00500-5
Arof, K. Z. M., Ismail, S. & Saleh, A. L. (2018). Critical success factors of contractor’s performance appraisal system in the Malaysian construction industry. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(11), 1197–1206. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01622.4
Banaitiene, N. & Banaitis, A. (2006). Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12(4), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.3846/13928619.2006.9637754
Bernama. (2021, September 11). Malaysia desperately needs more 3D workers in the construction sector. New Straits Times, 1. https://api.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/09/726325/malaysia-desperately-needs-more-3d-workers-construction-sector
CIDB. (2018). Panduan Program Penilaian Keupayaan & Kemampuan Kontraktor (SCORE). In CIBD & SME Corp.
Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). (2022). Total Number of Contractors. CIDB. https://cims.cidb.gov.my/smis/regcontractor/index.vbhtml
Dave, R., Parmar, K., Patel, B. & Prajapati, R. (2017). The Criteria for Contractors ’ Selection and Bid Evaluation & Factors Affecting Bidding Strategy in Construction. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 2(4), 488–491.
De Araujo, M. C. B., Alencar, L. H. & Mota, C. M. M. (2017). Model for contractor performance evaluation in the construction industry. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2016 - Conference Proceedings, October 2631–2635. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844636
Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2023). QUARTERLY CONSTRUCTION STATISTICS, FOURTH QUARTER 2022 (Issue February). https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=77&bul_id=U2JlOStjQWluQitxSnlEYTZ1WFZadz09&menu_id=OEY5SWtFSVVFVUpmUXEyaHppMVhEdz09
Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C. & Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor’s performance on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007
Hatush, Z. & Skitmore, M. (1997). Criteria for contractor selection. Construction Management and Economics, 15(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373088
Idrus, A., Sodangi, M. & Amran, M. A. (2011). Decision criteria for selecting main contractors in Malaysia. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(12), 1358–1365.
Lee, M. R., Ismail, S. & Hussaini, M. (2014). Contractor’s Performance for Construction Project: A Review. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications Www.Ijera.Com ISSN, 4(7), 131–137. www.ijera.com
Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining Sample Size. In Qualitative Health Research, 10(1). Sage Publication Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118183
Okereke, R. A., Pepple, D. I. & Ihekweme, N. M. (2022). Assessment of the major contractors’ selection criteria and their impacts on civil engineering construction projects. ITEGAM- Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications (ITEGAM-JETIA), 8(36), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v8i36.820
Rashid, I., Ismail, S., Mohamed, Z. & Saleh, A. L. (2018). Contractor selection criteria: A study on Malaysian public construction projects. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17471
Rashvand, P., Majid, M. Z. A. & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Contractor management performance evaluation model at the prequalification stage. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(12), 5087–5101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.043
Shukery, N. M., Amirudin, R., Rahman, N. A., Ariffin, H. L. T. & Mahmud, S. H. (2018). Selection of contractor: A flexible performance-based approach. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3.21 Special Issue 21), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13649
Shukery, N. M., Amirudin, R. & Sofield, T. (2016). Level of importance of performance-based tender evaluation indicators. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(34). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i34/100842
Watt, D. J., Kayis, B. & Willey, K. (2010). The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.003
Published
2023-05-11
How to Cite
Dzulkalnine, N., Mat, Z., Mapplati, M. J., Abd. Razak, N., & Abu Bakar, S. M. S. (2023). A Review of the Business Management Capability and Adaptability among Malaysian Contractors in the SCORE Program. Information Management and Business Review, 15(1(I)SI), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i1(I)SI.3386
Section
Research Paper