Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economics Determinants of Fertility: Malaysia and United Kingdom

  • Rohana bt Kamaruddin Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam
  • Nor Rashidah Zainal Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam`
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v8i6(I).1518

Abstract

Abstract: The divergence between the literature on fertility decision making and the differences factors on determinants signifies the importance of this study. The study will conduct empirical analysis from the perspective of demographical dimension, socio-economics, intergenerational factors and microeconomics factors that is associated with fertility decision making from the theoretical perspective of quality vs. quantity of children. Order Probit model was employed using the selected sample of female at the age 15 to 49. The finding revealed educated women in Malaysia and UK decision on the number of children based on their fertility preference and career advancement. The other explanation is based on the relative price change by Becker's demand of children cost of child-rearing activities, urbanization, opportunity costs of child-bearing.

Keywords: Fertility-decision, socio-economics, demographical, intergenerational, microeconomics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In G. Becker, J. S. Duesenberry & B. Okun (Eds.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Princeton, pp. 209–231 Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M. & Tamura, R. (1990). Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S12-S37. Becker, G. S. (1981). Altruism in the Family and Selfishness in the Market Place. Economica, 48, 1–15. Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise of the Family. London: Harvard University Press Becker, G. S. & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Ouantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 279-299 Becker, G. S. & Lewis, G. H. (1974). Interrelation Between Quantity and Quality of Children, in T.W, Schultz (eds), Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children and Human Capital, PP. 81-90, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Bulatao, R. (2001). Introduction. Population and Development Review, 9, 688-702. Cain, M. (1983). Fertility as Adjustment to Risk. Population and Development Review, 9, 688-702 Cigno, A. (1998). Fertility Decisions When Infant Survival is Endogenous. Journal of Population Economics, 11, 21-28. Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. (2009). Microeconometrics Using Stata, Stata Press, College Station, TX, 2009 ESCAP, (1987). Population Research Leads 26:8 Easterlin, R. A. (1978). The Economic and Sociology of Fertility: A Synthesis, 57-113 in C. Tilly, ed., Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton University Press Grant, J., Hoorens, S., Sivadasan, S., Loo, M., DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Gibson S. & Butz W. (2004). Low fertility and population ageing: Causes, consequences, and policy options. UK: European Commission. RAND Corporation Garlor, O. & Weil, D. N. (1996). The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth. American Economic Review, 86(3), 374–387. Gyimah, S. O., Takyi, B. & Tenkorang, E. Y. (2008). Denominational Affiliation and Fertility Behaviour in an African Context: An Examination of Couple Data from Ghana. Journal of Biosocial Science, 40, 445-458. Hirshman, C. (1994). Why Fertility Changes? Annual Review Sociology, 20, 203-33.

Huan, N. D. (1997). A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Determinants of Fertility: The Case of Vietnam. Population Economics, 10, 251-271. Hondroyiannis, G. (2004). Modeling household fertility decision in Greece. The Social Science Journal, 41, 477 - 483 Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic Transition Theory. Population Studies, 50, 361-387 Minnesota Population Center, Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.2 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 201 Sah, R. K. (1991). The Effect of Child Mortality Changes on Fertility Choice and Parental Welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 582-606. Sobel, M. E. & Arminger, G. (1992). Modelling Household Fertility Decision: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Probit Model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 38-47 Schellekens, J. & van Poppel, F. (2012). Marital Fertility Decline in the Netherlands: Child Mortality, Real Wages, and Unemployment, 1860-1939. Demography, 49(3), 965–88. Schultz, T. P. (1974). Birth rate changes over space and time: a study of Taiwan, in: T.W. Schultz, ed., Economics of the family (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Schultz, T. P. (1994). Mortality decline in the low-income world: causes and consequences. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 83, 337-342. Schultz, P. (1981). Economics of Population. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Stata Press. (2012). Stata Base Reference Manual, Release 11. College Station, TX: Stata Press Quality of Life Index retrieved at www. economist.com United Nations. (2013, 2014). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2013). Fertility Levels and Trends as Assessed in the 2012 Revision of World Population Prospects. Wallace, R. A. & Wolf, A. (1995). Contemporary Sociology Theory: Continuing the Classical Tradition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall. Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behaviour. Journal of Political Economy, 81(S2), S14–S64. World Health Organizations, Global Health Observatory Data Repository Assessed at pps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.2060.

Published
2017-01-28
How to Cite
Kamaruddin, R. bt, & Zainal, N. R. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economics Determinants of Fertility: Malaysia and United Kingdom. Information Management and Business Review, 8(6(I), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v8i6(I).1518
Issue
Vol 8 No 6(I) (2016)
Section
Research Paper

Copyright (c) 2017 Information Management and Business Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, the editorial team  edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.