Analysis of the Perceptions of Administrators on the Educations Regulations

  • Saduman Kapusuzoglu Hacettepe University, Beytepe-Ankara
  • Zubeyde Copur Hacettepe University, Beytepe-Ankara

Abstract

The main purpose of the Ministry of National Education Guidance and Inspection Directorate and Education Inspectors Directorates Regulation consists of defining the organizations and duties of these directorates. In this respect, the regulation deals with the power and responsibilities of education inspectors to be appointed in the directorates separately and regulates issues such as their appointment, employment, training and replacement; in short all working style and principles. In this study, it is aimed at analyzing and evaluating the Ministry of National Education Guidance and Supervision Directorate and Education Inspectors Directorates Regulation taking the views of inspectors in the dimensions of structure, process and understanding. In line with this purpose, the views of education inspectors (N=86) have been obtained by Baskan and Kapusuzoğlu (2013) through a survey of 25 items developed in line with the regulations. The obtained data has been analyzed through averages, the T- test, Anova and Tukey-B tests. As a result of the study, it has been concluded that the inspectors do not find the application terms related to the competition examination and the changes made in terms of the examination board, regulations made in terms of the reclamation period and the oral examination process “appropriate†and that they find the regulations related to the written examination subjects and score weight, their training and appointment “partially appropriate.†In addition, the views of the inspectors do not display differences based on personal characteristics with the exception of terms of service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baskan, G. A. & Kapusuzoglu, S. (2013). Comparative Assessment of Supervisory Regulations Related to Appointment, Training and Change of Location. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(3), 185-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v5i3.393

Başar, H. (1998). Eğitim Denetçisi. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.

Başaran, I. E. (2000). Eğitim Yönetimi Nitelikli Okul. Ankara: Feryal Publishing.

Blumberg, A. (1980). Supervisors & Teachers: A Private Cold War. California: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

Ergün, M., Recepoğlu, E., Küçük, Z. A. & Oğuz, K. (2014). Türkiye’deki Üniversitelerde Eğitim Denetimi Alanında Yapılan Lisansüstü Tezlerin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelemesi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(1), 25-40.

Taymaz, H. (1997). Eğitim Sisteminde Teftiş Kavramlar İlkeler yöntemler. Ankara: TAVAK.

TDK (Türk Dil Kurumu). Eğitim Terimleri Sözlüğü, İktisat Terimleri Sözlüğü. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&arama=kelime&guid=TDK. GTS.5193875c91e145.30872510> (23/12/2012).

Terzi, A. R. (1996). İlköğretim Müfettişlerinin Teftiş Sorunları (Unpublished Thesis). Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Tortop, N., İşbir, E., Aykaç, B., Yayman, H. & Özer, M.A. (2007). Yönetim Bilimi. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Uslu, B. (2013). Eğitim Denetmenlerinin Seçimi, Atamaları ve Mali Hakları İle Yetiştirilmelerine İlişkin Sorunların İncelenmesi. Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, (11-2), 191-205.

Published
2016-04-04
How to Cite
Kapusuzoglu, S., & Copur, Z. (2016). Analysis of the Perceptions of Administrators on the Educations Regulations. Information Management and Business Review, 8(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v8i1.1195
Section
Research Paper