The Integration of General Education in the Academic Programme to Enhance the Self-Efficacy of Accounting Students at a South African University
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of General Education in enhancing the Self-efficacy of Cost and Management Accounting (CMA) students to assess whether Self-efficacy, is having any positive influence on the students’ academic performance. The research design for this paper was descriptive, longitudinal and a mixed-method approach. The nature of the quasi-experimental approach that was used in the current paper is a non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. The target population was CMA students. A census survey was conducted. Findings, which were analysed with the aid of descriptive statistics, indicate a significant correlation in the post-test (Self-efficacy) scores of the group that undertook the General Education Modules and not the group that did not undertake the General Education Modules. This paper recommends the implementation of General Education skills into the curriculum and a model to measure Self-efficacy of students. Moreover, these skills appear to be very poor amongst current learners and respondents believed that Self-efficacy could have a positive effect on the academic performance of learners.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191-215.
Bandura, A. 1994. Self-Efficacy. In: Ramachaudran. V. S. eds. Encyclopedia of human. New York: Academic Press, 71-81.
Barac, K. 2009. South African training officers’ perceptions of the knowledge and skills requirements of entry-level trainee accountants. Meditari Accountancy Research, 17(2): 19-46.
Best, J. W. and Kahn, J. V. 2006. Research in Education. 10th ed. Boston, Massaschusetts: Allyn and Bacon/Pearson Education.
Brief, A. P. and Aldag, R. J. 1981. The ‘self’ in work organization: a conceptual review. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 75-88.
Carlsen, W. 1999. Domains of teacher knowledge. In: Gess-Newsome, J and Lederman, N. G. eds. Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 133-144.
Carver Learning Systems. 2019. Definition of rauding. Available: http://www.carverlearning.com/our-story (Accessed 12 October 2019).
Carver, R. P. 1978. Another look at rauding theory. Reading Research, 13(1): 116-132.
Centre for Development and Enterprise. 2011. Value in the classroom: the quantity and quality of South Africa's teachers. Johannesburg: Centre for Development and Enterprise.
Cherry, K. 2018. What is Self-Efficacy? Available: https://www.verywell.com/what-is-Self-efficacy-2795954 (Accessed 26 September 2018).
CIMA. 2010. National award for Management Accounting. Available: http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Member percent20docs/nafma-APPENDIX.pdf (Accessed 14 September 2016).
Davis, M. 2012. Critical analysis of social cognition and social learning theory. Available: https://www.academia.edu/1469375/Critical_Analysis_of_Social_Cognition_and_Social_Learning_Theory (Accessed 04 September 2018).
De Villiers, R. 2010. The incorporation of soft skills into Accounting curricula: preparing accounting graduates for their unpredictable futures. Meditari Accountancy Research, 18(2): 1-22.
Deloitte Global Services. 2019. Formation and membership of IFAC. Available: http://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/global-organisations/ifac (Accessed 26 September 2019).
Department of Basic Education. 2014. National senior certificate examination 2014: diagnostic report. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Facione, P. A. 2015. Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Hermosa Beach, California: Measured Reasons LLC.
FASSET. 2011. Scarce skills guideline. Blackhealth, Randburg: FASSET.
Fawcett, A. 2015. Practical application of the international education standards (unpublished policy document).
Gist, M. E. and Mitchell, T. R. 1992. Self-Efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2): 183-211.
Gray, F. E. 2010. Specific oral communication skills desired in new accountancy graduates. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(1): 40-67.
Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications, 105-117.
Hart, K. E. and Kritsonis, W. L. 2006. Critical analysis of an original writing on social learning theory: imitation of film-mediated aggressive models by: Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross and Sheila A. Ross (1963). National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 20(3): 1-7.
International Federation of Accountants. 2008a. International education standard 3: professional skills and general education. New York, USA: International Accounting Education Standards Board.
International Federation of Accountants. 2008b. International education standards 1-8. New York, USA: International Accounting Education Standards Board.
Kerby, D. and Romine, J. 2009. Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. Education for Business, 85(3): 172-179.
Krathwohl, D. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practise, 41(4): 212-225.
Kurland, D. J. 2000. What is critical thinking? Available: http://www.criticalreading.com/critical_thinking.htm (Accessed 29 September 2018).
Mayer, R. E. 2002. Rote versus meaningful Learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4): 226-232.
McLeod, S. A. 2014. Bobo Doll Experiment. Available: https://www.simplypsychology.org/bobo-doll.html (Accessed 06 September 2018).
Naidoo, S. K. and Garbharran, H. L. 2013. Communication skills as a subject in the programme Cost and Management Accounting at a South African university. Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(7): 484-495.
National education evaluation and development unit. 2013. NEEDU National Report 2012: The State of Literacy Teaching and Learning in the Foundation Phase. Pretoria: National Education Evaluation and Development Unit.
Nel, N. and Muller, H. 2010. The impact of teachers’ limited English proficiency on English second language learners in South African schools. Education, 30: 635-650.
Ormrod, J. E. 2008. Human learning. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Pickworth, G. 2001. Developing an instrument to identify MBCHB learners’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 15(2): 140-145.
Ramos, J. T. 2010. A study on schema activation, summarizing, and critical evaluation as predictors of writing proficiency. Research and Review, 5(1): 31-39.
Slabbert, J. A. and Gouws, D. G. 2006.The quest for powerful learning environments in higher education. Higher Education, 20(2): 336-351.
South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. 2008b. The financial management, accounting and auditing skills shortage research report: executive summary. Kengray: SAICA.
Taylor, N., Van der Berg, S. and Mabogoane, T. 2012. What makes schools effective? Report of the national schools effectiveness study. Cape Town: Pearson Education South Africa.
Thomas, T. 2011.Developing first year learners’ critical thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 7(4): 26-35.
Wessels, P. L. 2005. Critical information and communication technology and communication for professional accountants. Meditari Accountancy Research 13(1): 87-103.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C. and Griffin, M. 2013. Business research methods. 9th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 82-91.
Copyright (c) 2020 Suntharmurthy Kristnasamy Naidoo, S. Govender
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
