Anonymous Feedback Using Digital Walls: A Case Study
Abstract
A common problem faced by many language teachers is students’ fear from speaking in front of the whole class and making mistakes. Research showed that reticence to participate in class may influence students’ language learning who may miss important opportunities for correction. This paper reports on students’ reactions to the use of digital walls to provide anonymous oral feedback and to maximize students’ participation. The students engaged in answering three-minute instructor-posed questions on their mobile devices using an application called Quick fire as found on www.spiral.ac. The anonymous answers were displayed instantaneously on the smartboard which allowed the instructor to provide the students with real-time feedback. The students answered 14 questions after eight weeks of instruction. At the end of the project, the students were invited to focus group discussions in order to delve into their opinions about using digital walls for providing feedback and encouraging class participation. Qualitative analysis of the students’ comments indicated that they had a generally positive experience and that anonymous posting can foster students’ engagement.Downloads
References
Barnes, K., Marateo, R. & Ferris, S. P. (2007a). Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3(4). Retrieved from: http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue4/Teaching_and_Learning_with_the_Net_ Generation.pdf
Crombie, G., Pyke, S. W., Silverthorn, N., Jones, A. & Piccinin, S. (2003). Students’ perceptions of their classroom participation and instructor as a function of gender and context. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 51-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2003.0001
Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fassinger, P. A. (1995a). Professors’ and students’ perceptions of why students participate in class. Teaching Sociology, 24, 2533. (ES) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1318895
Ferris. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of second language writing, 16, 165–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.003
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N. & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of Promoting College Student Course Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Horwitz, E. K. (2000). It ain’t over ‘til it over: on foreign language anxiety first language deficits and confounding of variables. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00067
Roblyer, M. (2003). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Weaver, R. R. & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 570-601. (ES) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0038
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Education and Vocational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
