The Impact of Poverty Reduction Program into Papuan Women Economy Behavior in District of Kemtuk Gresi, Jayapura Regency (Case Study)
Abstract
Based on The Intenasional Summit which had launced the 8th important issues on Millenium Development Goals (MDGs), is very usefull to improve the communitylife. The quality of women’s life has been one of basic aspects to build sustainable development of a nation (Khofifah, 1998). Sustainable development can take place if the entire communities (men and women) being optimally involved in whole development program with using efficient and effective principles. The quality of life is largerly determined by formal and non formal education, both poor degree of health and nutrition, buruknya derajat kesehatan dan gizi, and also the presence of accessbility to development resources. Those factors mentioned above are mutual supporting and can not be separated from one another. Although, development activity in Papua Province is growing up, the society is still livingin the cycles of poverty, especially for women in District of Kemtuk Gresy, Jayapura Regency, Province of Papua. The aims of the study are : 1) to know the impact of Poverty Reduction Program (into the changing of economy behavior of Papuan Women in Kemtuk Gresi, Jayapura Regency, Papua Province; 2) to explore how Poverty Reduction Program influenced the generating income of Papuan Women. The methods of data collection are in-depth interview to 150 respondents, and 5 key informants (Community, Traditional, Religion, Women, and Youth Leaders), and observation as well. In order to find the answer, is using descriptive qualitative. The result of the first research question indicated that in terms of Changing of economic behavior: 34 percent of Papuan Women in Kemtuk Gresi are changing their economic behavior, mainly their production and marketing strategy; whereas 66 percent of respondents are still in traditional way for production and marketing. The second result is 38 percent of respondent’s income is increasing, and 44 percent respondents are remains static or even volatile, finally, 18 percent respondents are going out from economic activities, because of missing capital of business. Starting from the result, we can give some recommendations: 1) changing economic behavior should be started from young people, so all parties should participate intensively to push young women entrepreneur to engage in business activity; 2) the government should involve traditional leaders to support women entrepreneurs by providing a piece of land or other forms of capital.Downloads
References
Akerlof, G. (2001). Behavioral Macro Economics and Macro Economic Behavior, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880, USA.
Becker, G. S. (1992). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, the University of Chicago Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Booth, A. (2000). Poverty and Inequality in the Soeharto Era: an Assessment. Buletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 36 (1), 73-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910012331337793
Dolgoff, R., Feldstein, D. & Stolnik, L. (1997). Understanding Social Welfare, 4th ed. P.5:
Duckworth, C., Elliot, K. & Whiteley, S. (2004). The Old Girls Network: Insider Advice for Women Building Business in a Man’s World. Awareness, 11, 101-106
Hadi, S. (2001). Research Methodology, First Edition, Andi, Yogyakarta.
Ilham, N. (2003). Impact of Economic Liberalization on the Trade and welfare of third Countries. Journal of Economic and Development, LIPI, XI (2).
Jhingan, M. L. (2003). Planning and Development Economic, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Kahneman, D. (2002). Illusion of Validity, Anchoring Bias; New York Times. US America.
Khan, M. H. (2001). Rural Poverty in Developing Countries, IMF Working Paper, Economic Issue No 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589060067.051
Khofifah, I. P. (1998). Gender Base-Development in Indonesia, Gajah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.
Kuncoro, M. (1997). Development Economic – Theory, Problem and Policy, 3th Editions, UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Minton, E. A. & Kahle, L. R. (2013). Belief Systems, Religion, and Behavioral Economics: Marketing in Multicultural Environments, Business Expert Press.
Rinusu, S. M. (2003). APBD Responsif Gender, CiBA, Jakarta.
Salvatore, D. (2001). Microeconomic Theory, 3th Edition, Schaum Book Serial, Theory and Questions, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Samuelson, P. & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Macro-Economics, 19th Edition, Mc-Graw Hills, Boston.
Scholz, J. K. & Levine, K. (2000). The Evolution of Income Support Policy in Recent Decades, Focus, Wisconsin.
Simon, H. A. (1978). Administrative Behavior, 4th Edition, Simon & Schuster Inc. United Kingdom.
Thoha, M. & Winanta, S. (2006). Empowering Small-Micro Business through Ventura capital as an effort to alleviate the Poverty in Indonesia. Journal of Economic and Development, LIPI, XIV (2) Tahun 2006, Jakarta.
Todaro, M. P. (2000). Development Economic in the Third Countries, 7thEdition, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Education and Vocational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.