Effect of Auditor Ethics, Knowledge and Dysfunctional Behavior Audit Office of the Quality of Public Accountants in Makassar
Abstract
Cases of violation of the Public Accountants Professional Standards at Drs. Mitrawinata and colleagues, due to unfavorable auditor ethics where Drs. Peter Partner Winatadari as Public Accountant (AP) violated the Public Accountants Professional Standards (SPAP) relating to the audit that the general audit assignment restrictions on financial statements Muzatek Jaya. Associated with good audit quality, there are several things that affect them auditor ethics, knowledge and dysfunctional behavior. This study aims to determine the effect of auditor ethics, knowledge and dysfunctional behavior on audit quality either simultaneously or partially on public accounting firm in Makassar. The sampling technique using saturated sampling technique, in order to obtain a sample of 37 respondents. Methods of data analysis using multiple linear regression techniques, test F and test t. These results indicate that the auditor ethics, knowledge and dysfunctional behavior simultaneously significant positive effect on audit quality in the public accounting firm in Makassar. Partially ethics of auditors and knowledge of significant positive effect on audit quality, but not for the dysfunctional behavior that significant negative effect on audit quality. The level of contribution influence auditor ethics, knowledge and dysfunctional behavior on audit quality is high. This is caused by some respondents to variable auditor ethics, knowledge and quality of the audit is still no answer neutral and do not agree, while the dysfunctional behavior variables still exist some respondents who answered disagree and strongly disagree.Downloads
References
Adanan, S. (2011). Pengaruh Multidimensi Komitmen Profesional Terhadap Perilaku Audit Disfungsional. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing, 8(1).
Alvin, A., Arens, R. J. & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing dan jasa Assurance, edisi keduabelas, jilid 1. Jakarta salemba empat
Angga F. (2012). Pengertian Auditor. Melalui http://capungtempur.blogspot.com (tanggal akses 29 Januari 2015).
DeZoort, F. T. & Lord, A. T. (1997). A Review and Synthesis of Pressure Effects Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 28-58.
Donelly, D. P., Quirin, J. J. & O Bryan, D. (2005). Locus of Control and Dysfunctional Audit Behavior. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 3(10).
Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit : CV. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Mulyadi. (2002). Auditing. Buku 2. Edisi Ke Enam. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Nurul. (2014). Pengaruh Karakter Individual (Locus of Control), Tekanan Anggaran Waktu dan Moralitas Auditor Terhadap Perilaku Audit Disfungsional. Artikel Academia-Edu, pp : 2-3. Melalui http://www.academia.edu (tanggal akses 29 Januari 2015).
Purnamasari, D. & Hernawati, E. (2013). Pengaruh Etika Auditor, Pengalaman, Pengetahuan dan Perilaku Disfunsional Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal NeO-Bis, 7(2).
Purwanda, E. & Shiddieqhy, M. A. (2013). Pengaruh Karakteristik Personal Auditor dan Perilaku Disfungsional Terhadap Kualitas Audit. ISSN 1693-4482.
Sekaran, U. (2006). Research Methods for Business. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Soekidjo, N. (2005). Edisi III Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Sososutikno, C. (2003). Hubungan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu dengan Perilaku Disfungsional serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Kualitas Audit. Simposium National Akuntansi, 3, 1116-1124.
Sugiyono. (2013). Method Penelitian Manajemen. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sujana, E. & Sawarjuwono, T. (2006). Perilaku Disfungsional Auditor: Perilaku yang Tidak Mungkin Dihentikan. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 8, 247-259.
Sularso, S. & Na’im, A. (1999). Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman Akuntan pada Pengetahuan dan Penggunaan Intuisi dalam Mendeteksi Kekeliruan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 2(1).
Sularso, S. (2003). Metode Penelitian Akuntansi: Sebuah Pendekatan Replikasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Sumarna, C. (2007). Filsafat Ilmu dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Sunyoto, D. (2011). Metode apenelitian Ekonomi, Alat statistik & Analisis output Komputer. CAPS, Yogyakarta.
Tarigan, M. U., Primsa, B. & Susanti, K. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Etika, Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 803-832
Wandita, N. L. P. T. A., Yuniarta, G. A. & Darmawan, N. A. S. (2014). Pengaruh Pengetahuan, Pengalaman Kerja Audit dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Kerja Auditor Internal. Jurnal Akuntansi, 2(1).
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Education and Vocational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper, the editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
