A Comparison of World and Domestic Price Volatilities of Oilseeds: The Ethiopian Case

  • Zerihun G. Kelbore

Abstract

This study investigates and compares oilseeds price volatilities in the world market and the Ethiopian market. It uses a monthly time series data on oilseeds from February 1999 to December 2012; and analyses price volatilities using unconditional method (standard deviation) and conditional method (GARCH). The results indicate that oilseeds prices are more volatile, but not persistent, in the domestic market than the world market. The magnitude of the influence of the news about past volatility (innovations) is higher in the domestic market for Rapeseed and in the World market for Linseed. However, in both markets there is a problem of volatility clustering. The study also identified that due to the financial crisis the world market price volatilities surpassed and/or paralleled the higher domestic oilseeds price volatilities. The higher domestic oilseeds price volatility may imply that the price risks are high in the domestic oilseeds market. As extreme price volatility influences farmers` production decision, they may opt to other less risky, low-value and less profitable crop varieties. The implications of such retreat is that it may keep the farmers in the traditional farming and impede their transformation to the high value crops, and results in lower income hindering the poverty reduction efforts of the government. This is more important to consider today than was before, because measures undertaken to reduce poverty must bring sustainable change in the lives of the rural poor. For this reason, agricultural policies that enable farmers cope with price risks and enhance their productivity are crucial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2015-04-30
How to Cite
Kelbore, Z. G. (2015). A Comparison of World and Domestic Price Volatilities of Oilseeds: The Ethiopian Case. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(2(J), pp. 145-161. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v7i2(J).573
Section
Research Paper