Consumption with Imperfect Income Expectations
Abstract
Using survey forecast data, this paper documents several stylized facts about forecasters’ beliefs on income and consumption and aggregate consumption growth: (1) survey-based income forecast at consensus level is highly correlated with consumption growth; (2) consensus income and consumption growth forecast errors under-react to macro news shocks and (3) consensus income forecast error and consumption growth under-react initially and overreact subsequently in response to main business cycle shocks. Motivated by this evidence, we propose a model of equilibrium consumption determination where agents learn the exogenous latent permanent income process and extrapolate the past income realizations. Our model can generate the behavior of consumption that the rational-expectation Permanent Income Hypothesis fails to predict excess smoothness and excess sensitivity of aggregate consumption, and negatively correlated consumption growth and past income change in the medium run. This study contributes to the literature on economic belief formation and empirical consumption by showing how survey-motivated evidence can jointly explain a range of important anomalies.
Downloads
References
Angeletos, G. M., Huo, Z. & Sastry, K. A. (2020). Imperfect macroeconomic expectations: Evidence and theory. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 35.
Attanasio, O. P. & Pavoni, N. (2011). Risk sharing in private information models with asset accumulation: Explaining the excess smoothness of consumption. Econometrica, 79(4).
Barberis, N., Greenwood, R., Jin, L. & Shleifer, A. (2015). X-capm: An extrapolative capital asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(1), 1–24.
Barberis, N., Greenwood, R., Jin, L. & Shleifer, A. (2018). Extrapolation and bubbles. Journal of Financial Economics.
Beeler, J. & Campbell, J. Y. (2012). The long-run risks model and aggregate asset prices: An empirical assessment. Critical Finance Review, 1(1).
Berrada, T. (2006). Incomplete information, heterogeneity, and asset pricing. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4(1).
Bondt, D., F., W. & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805.
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Ma, Y. & Shleifer, A. (2020). Overreaction in macroeconomic expectations, 110(9), 2748–82.
Caballero, R. J. (1990). Consumption puzzles and precautionary savings. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25(1), 113-136.
Campbell, J. & Deaton, A. (1989). Why is consumption so smooth. The Review of Economic Studies, 56(3).
Campbell, J. & Deaton, A. (n.d.). Why is consumption so smooth? The Review of Economic Studies, 56(3).
Carroll, C. D., Crawley, E., Slacalek, J., Tokuoka, K. & White, M. N. (n.d.). Sticky expectations and consumption dynamics. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(3).
Chetty, R. & Szeidl, A. (2016). Consumption commitments and habit formation. Econometrica, 84(2), 855 – 890.
Coibion, O. & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015). Information rigidity and the expectations formation process: A simple framework and new facts. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2644–78.
Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M. & Summers, L. H. (1991). Speculative dynamics. the Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), 529–546.
da Silveira, R. A. & Woodford, M. (2019). Noisy memory and overreaction to the news. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109.
Deaton, A. (1986). Life-cycle models of consumption: Is the evidence consistent with the theory? Working Paper.
Fernandez-Villaverde, J. & Krueger, D. (2007). Consumption over the life cycle: Facts from consumer expenditure survey data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3).
Flavin, M. (1981). The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5).
Gourinchas, P. O. & Parker, J. A. (2003). Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica.
Gourinchas, P. O. & Tornell, A. (2004). Exchange rate puzzles and distorted beliefs. Journal of International Economics, 64(2), 303–333.
Huang, K. X. & Caliendo, F. (2011). Rationalizing multiple consumption-saving puzzles in a unified framework. Front. Econ. China, 6(3), 359–388.
Jappelli, T. & Pistaferri, L. (2010). The consumption response to income changes. Annual Review of Economics, 2.
Kucinskas, S. & Peters, F. S. (2022). Measuring under- and overreaction in expectation formation. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Liao, J., Peng, C. & Zhu, N. (2021). Extrapolative bubbles and trading volume. The Review of Financial Studies.
Matejka, F. (2016). Rationally inattentive seller: Sales and discrete pricing. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(3), 1125–1155.
Nimark, K. (2008). Dynamic pricing and imperfect common knowledge. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(2), 365–382.
Pagel, M. (2017). Expectations-based reference-dependent life-cycle consumption. Review of Economic Studies, 84, 885–934.
Reis, R. (2006). Inattentive consumers. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 1761–1800.
Sims, C. A. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665– 690.
Sims, C. A. (2010). Rational inattention and monetary economics, 2, 155–181.
Sims, C. A. (2010). Rational inattention and monetary economics. Handbook of Monetary Economics, 3, 155–181.
The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. (n.d.).
Timmermann, A. (2001). Structural breaks, incomplete information, and stock prices. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(3), 299–314.
Vasudevan, K., Valente, J. P. & Wu, T. (2022). The role of beliefs in asset prices: Evidence from exchange rates. Working Paper.
Zinn, J. (2013). Self-attribution bias and consumption. Working Paper.
Copyright (c) 2024 TIANHAO WU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
