The Effect of Sectorial Contributions to GDP on Environmental Degradation: A Verification of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Nigeria

  • Olanipekun Emmanuel Falade Obafemi Awolowo University
  • Williams Owolabi Adeyemi Obafemi Awolowo University
Keywords: Carbon dioxide Emissions, Environmental Sustainability, Economic Growth

Abstract

This paper empirically verifies the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in Nigeria by focusing on the relationship between key sectors of the Nigerian economy and environmental degradation. The study adopted the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model using time series data for the period 1981-2018. The bounds-testing approach proposed by Pesaran, Shin and Smith, (2001) was adopted to test for cointegration. The results show a long-run relationship between economic growth (disaggregated into key sectors) and environmental degradation measured by carbon dioxide emissions. In the short run, agriculture, industry and services sectors significantly explained the variation in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, while the construction sector does not have any significant effect on Carbon emissions both in the current and the future periods. Specifically, the industrial sector has a positive effect on CO2 emissions which confirms the short-run EKC hypothesis; while agriculture and services though were significant, have a negative effect on CO2 emissions, invalidating the short-run EKC hypothesis. In the long run, industry and services sectors were significant in explaining variation in CO2 emission. However, while the services sector shows a negative relationship with CO2 emission in line with the long-run EKC Hypothesis, the industrial sector invalidates the hypothesis with a positive effect. These results imply that the key sectors of the economy have varied effects on environmental degradation, hence the hypothesis is inconclusive. Nigeria is therefore advised to pursue economic growth via industrial and services sectors with an emphasis on environmental sustainability, which could be achieved through the use of renewable and cleaner technology in nation-building.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adu, D. T. & Denkyirah, E. K. (2017). Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution in West Africa: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences.
Aghion, P., Reinhilde, V. & David, H. (2009). No Green Growth without Innovation.
Akinlo, A. E. (2009). Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Evidence from Cointegration and Co-Feature Analysis. Journal of Policy Modelling, Elsevier, 31(5), 681-693.
Akpan, G. E. &Akpan, U. F. (2012). Electricity Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2, 292-306.
Alam, M. J., Begum, I. A., Buysse, J., Rahman, S. & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). Dynamic Modeling of Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption, Co2 Emissions and Economic Growth in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 3243–3251.
Ang, J. (2007). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Output in France. Energy Policy, 35(10), 47724778.
Baek, J. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: The Case of Arctic Countries. Energy Economics, 50(C), 13-17.
Bell, R. G. & Russell, C. (2002). Environmental Policy for Developing Countries. Issues in Science and Technology, 18(3), 38-51.
Demir, C., Cergibozan, R. & Gok, A. (2018). Income Inequality and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Turkey. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18793109.
Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of Econometric Society, 55, 251-276.
Erata?, F. & Uysal, D. (2014). Cevresel Kuznets Egrisi Yaklasiminin BRICT Ikeleri Kapsaminda Degerlendedirilimesi, 64, 1-25.

Kopits, E., Marten, L. & Wolverton, A. (2013). Moving Forward with Incorporating “Catastrophic” Climate Change into Policy Analysis. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Economics.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.

Lean, H. H. & Smyth, R. (2010). Multivariate Granger Causality between Electricity Generation, Exports and GDP in Malaysia. Energy, 35, 3640-3648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.008
Martin, L. & Vaitilingam, R. (2014). The Impact of ‘Clean Innovation’ on Economic Growth: Evidence from the Transport and Energy Industries. www.cep.lse.ac.uk.
Mckie, R. (2018). Portrait of the planet on the verge of climate catastrophe. www.guardian.com
Obioesio, F. (2015). Financial Deepening and Economic Growth: Reassessing the Empirics for Nigeria. European Journal of International Management.
Ogboru, I. & Anga, R. A. (2015). Environmental Degradation and Sustainable Economic Development in Nigeria: A Theoretical Approach. Research Journal of Economics, 3(6), 49-64.
Omoju, O. (2014). Environmental Pollution is Inevitable in Developing Countries. Breaking Energy. www.breakingenergy.com
Ozturk, I. & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220–3225.
Öztürk, Z. & Ertugrul, Y. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve in the MINT countries: Evidence of Long-Run Panel Causality Test. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 11(1).
Pereira, J. C. & Viola, E. (2018). Catastrophic Climate Change and Forest Tipping Points: Blind Spots in International Politics and Policy. University of Durham and John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Soytas, U., Sari, R. & Ewing, B. T. (2007). Energy Consumption, Income, and Carbon Emissions in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 62, 482–489.
Sulaiman, C, Abdulrahim, A., Waziri, S. I., Huong, W. M. & Ahmad, A. A. (2014). Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and GDP in Nigeria. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. Journal ISSN: 0343-2521. DOI: 10/1007/s10708-014-9558-6
Sulaiman, C. & Abdul-Rahim, A. S. (2017). The Relationship between CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Malaysia: A Three-Way Linkage Approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(32).
Steiguer, J. E. (1995). Three Theories from Economics about the Environment. BioScience, 45(8), 552-557.
Stern, I. (2011). The Environmental Kuznets Curve. International Society for Ecological Economics Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics.
United Nations Sustainable Development. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vithali, C. D. (2018). How Does Development affect the Environment? www.quora.com
Wallace-Wells, D. (2019). It Is Absolutely Time to Panic about Climate Change. www.vox.com.
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
Yahaya, N. S., Iro, H. N. & Kabiru, S. K. (2019). Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Nigeria. Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(2), 173–178 ISSN 2393-4913, ISSN On-line 2457-5836.
Zaidi, S., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M. & Hou, F. (2019). Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions from Asia Pacific Economic Countries. Journal of Clean Production, 228:533-543
Published
2023-01-12
How to Cite
Falade, O. E., & Adeyemi, W. O. (2023). The Effect of Sectorial Contributions to GDP on Environmental Degradation: A Verification of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 14(4(J), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v14i4(J).3354
Section
Research Paper