Is the Public Private Partnership Model the Right Vehicle for Public Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries?
Abstract
There has been an increase in the number of governments that adopted public-private partnership (PPP) as an infrastructure delivery model. However, there are still misgivings about the role PPPs play in developing countries’ economies. The objective of this study is to address the question of whether the PPP model really benefits the public. This study follows a qualitative approach based on international review of literature on PPP experiences around the world. The results of the study indicate that, the PPP model can be a good vehicle for delivering public infrastructure projects in developing countries. However, for PPPs to meet the expectations of the public sector and the citizens there are certain aspects that need to be in place i.e. transparency, accountability, optimum risk allocation/sharing, and increased competition to name just a few. If a country implements its PPP programme properly, there are massive benefits compared to the public procurement approach that may accrue to consumers and the economy as a whole. Such benefits include reduced prices, which may also increase access to services. The study has elucidated valid from invalid arguments about PPPs and has established whether the PPP model is indeed the right vehicle for delivering infrastructure projects.
Downloads
References
Allen, G. (2001). The private finance initiative (PFI). The House of Commons’, Research Paper No. 01/117, December.
Bafoil, F. & Ruiwen, L. (2010). Re-examining the role of transport infrastructure in trade, regional growth and governance: Comparing the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and Central Eastern Europe (CEE). Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 2(2010), 73–119.
Binza, S. M. (2008). Public-private partnerships in metropolitan government: Perspectives on governance, value for money and the roles of selected stakeholders. Development Southern Africa, 25(3), 297–315.
Bloomfield, P. (2006). The challenging business of long-term public-private partnership: Reflections on local experience. Public Administration Review, 66(93), 400–411.
Boardman, A. E., Laurin, C., Moore, M. A. & Vining, A. R. (2009). A cost-benefit analysis of the privatization of Canadian national railway. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques, 35(1), 58–83.
Boopen, S. (2006). Transport infrastructure and economic growth: Evidence from Africa using dynamic panel estimates. The Empirical Economics Letters, 5(1), 37–52.
Brits, A. (2010). The financial burden of national roads infrastructure and the equity thereof: A South African perspective. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 4(1), 39–56.
Corry, D. (2004). New Labour and PPPs’. In: Ghobadian, A., Gallear, D., O’Regan, N. & Viney, H. eds. The public-private partnerships: Policy and experience. London: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, 24–36.
Currie, D. (2000). Funding the London underground, Discussion paper 35, [online]. London: London Business School, March.
De Bettignies, J. & Ross T. W. (2004). The economics of public-private partnerships. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politique, xxx(2), 135–154.
Domberger, S. & Jensen, P. (1997). Contracting out by the public sector: Theory, evidence and prospects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13(4), 67–78.
Domberger, S. & Rimmer, S. (1994). Competitive tendering and contracting in the public sector: A survey. In: Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. eds. The economics of public-private partnerships. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
Dudkin, G. & Valila, T. (2005). Transaction costs in public-private partnerships: a first look at the evidence. Economic and Financial Report 2005/3. European Investment Bank.
Eberhard, A., Kolker, J. & Leigland, J. (2014). South Africa’s renewable energy IPP program: Success factors and lessons. Public-private infrastructure advisory facility (PPIAF). May. Washington DC. World Bank.
Engel, E., Fischer, R. & Galetovic, A. (2013). The Basic Public Finance of Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1), 993-1020.
European Commission. (2003). Guidelines for successful public-private partnerships. Brussels: European Commission.
European Investment Bank. (2005). Evaluation of PPP projects financed by the EIB. Evaluation Report; March.
Fourie, F. & Burger, P. (2000). An economic analysis and assessment of public-private partnerships (PPPs). The South African Journal of Economics, 68(4), 305–315.
Gabriel, S. & Head, J. (2005). The private financing initiative: An innovative procurement tool for today’s public administrators, [online]. Washington: George Washington University.
Globerman, S. & Vining, A. R. (1996). A framework for evaluating the government contracting-out decision with an application to information technology. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 577–586.
Grimsey, D. & Lewis, M. K. (2005). Introduction’, In: Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M.K. eds. The economics of public-private partnerships, xiii–xl. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Guash, J. L. (2004). Granting and Renegotiating Concession Contracts: Doing it right; World Bank. Washington.
Hall, D. (2015). Why public-private partnerships don’t work: The many advantages of public alternatives. Public services international research unit. University of Greenwich.
Harris, C. (2003). Private participation in infrastructure in developing countries: Trends, impacts, and policy lessons. World Bank Working Paper, No.5. Washington DC. April.
International Monetary Fund. (2004). Public-private partnerships. Paper prepared by the Fiscal Affairs Department. Washington: March. Washington DC: IMF.
Ismail, Z., Mabuza, P., Pillay, K. & Xolo, S. (2014). Infrastructure development within a regulated environment: Concern for regulators. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 7(s), 69-586.
Kim, B. (2006). Infrastructure Development for the economic development in developing countries: Lessons from Korea and Japan. GSICS Working paper series, No.11. Kobe University, November.
King, P. S. (2001). Competitive tendering and contracting out: an introduction. Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200, August.
Klein, M. (1996). Risk, taxpayers, and the role of Government in Project Finance. Policy Research Working Paper 1688. Washington DC: The World Bank Private Sector Advisory Services Department, December.
Lapre, M. A. (2003). Managing learning curves in factories by creating and transferring knowledge. California management review, 46(1).
McDavid, J. C. & Clemens, E. G. (1995). Contracting out local government services: the B.C. experience. Canadian Public Administration, 38(2), 177–193.
Monga, A., Mahta, A. & Ranja, S. (2009). Problems and prospects of contracting out in India. A case study, JOAAG, 4(1), 86–97.
Moszoro, M. (2010). Efficient public-private partnerships. Working paper WP-884. October. IESE Business School. University of Navara.
Munnell, A. H. (1992). Infrastructure investment and economic growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4), 189–198.
OECD. (2006). Review of the national policy, legislative and institutional environment necessary for the establishment of municipal public-private partnerships (PPPs) for public service delivery and local development in the Europe and CIS region. UNDP Capacity 2015/PPPUE-Public-private partnerships programme. March. OECD.
Quiggin, J. (1996). Private sector involvement in infrastructure projects. Australian Economic review, 96(1), 51–64, 379–386.
Republic of South Africa. National Treasury. (2004). PPP Manual Module 1: South African Regulations for PPPs. National Treasury Practice Note No. 02. Pretoria: National Treasury.
Republic of South Africa. National Treasury. (2007). Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF). Pretoria: National Treasury.
Rives. J. M. & Heaney, M. T. (1995). Infrastructure and local economic development. Regional Science Perspectives, 25(1), 58–73.
Sadka, E. (2007). Public private partnerships: A public economics perspective. CESifo economic studies.
South African Road Agency Limited. (2012). Annual report.
Serrao, A. & Flanagan, L. (2011). R4 billion-toll contract fury: Foreign-owned firm to profit from ‘anti-people’ roads. The Star. 14 February.
Snieska, V. & Simkunaite, I. (2009). Socio-economic Impact of infrastructure investments. Economics of Engineering Decisions, (3), 16–24.
TD Economics. (2006). Creating the winning conditions for public-private partnerships (P3s) in Canada. Special Report, June.
United Kingdom, Department of International Development. (2007). Literature review on private sector infrastructure investment. Department of International Development (DFID) Working Paper No. 24, London: October.
United States of America, Department of Transportation. (2007). Case studies of transportation public-private partnerships around the world. Prepared for the office of policy and governmental affairs. Final Report, prepared by AECON consults Team, work order, 05-002, July.
Urban Land Institute. (2005). Ten principles for successful public/private partnerships. Washington DC ULI.
Vining, A. R. & Boardman, A. E. (2006). Public-private partnerships in Canada: theory and evidence. SAUDER School of Business, UBC P3 Project. Working Paper 2006-04. December.
Vining, A. R., Boardman, A. E. & Poschmann, F. (2004). Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S. and Canada: Case studies and lessons. International public procurement conference proceedings, 3.
Yescombe, E. R. (2007). Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
Yoshino, N. & Nakahigashi, M. (2000). The role of infrastructure in economic development.
Copyright (c) 2019 Patrick Mabuza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
