Risk Tolerance: The Influence of Gender and Life Satisfaction
Abstract
Abstract: Financial managers base an investor’s risk profile on their demographics and level of risk investors are willing to tolerate. Risk tolerance is often influenced by the different levels of life satisfaction that an investor experience and may differ based on the demographic composition of that investor. Demographic variables such as gender can differentiate between investors level of life satisfaction, which can ultimately affect investment decisions. As a result, the degree of life satisfaction can affect investment decisions by manipulating the level of risk that investors are willing to tolerate. Male and female investors can be categorised into different risk tolerance levels based on their satisfaction with life status. The aim of this study is to determine the risk tolerance level of male and female investors considering their level of life satisfaction. The results of this study indicated that the more unsatisfied investors are with their lives the less likely they will be to take on high-risk investments. Therefore, low life satisfaction is accompanied by a low-risk tolerance level. Male investors had higher life satisfaction compared to female investors. Female investors were only willing to tolerate high risk when experiencing extremely low life satisfaction or extremely high life satisfaction stages.
Downloads
References
Blume, M. (1978). The changing role of the individual investor. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Coet, L. J. & McDermott, P. J. (1979). Sex, instructional set, and group make-up: orgasmic and situational factors influencing risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 44(1), 1283-1294.
Creswell, J. W. & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed research methods. California: SAGE.
Crouhy, M., Galai, D. & Mark, R. (2014). The essentials of risk management. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Diener, E. & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: a general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(9), 391-406.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E. & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative effect. (In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119-139). New York: Pergamon). Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590-597.
Gilliam, J., Chatterjee, S. & Grable, J. E. (2010). Measuring the perception of financial risk tolerance: a tale of two measures. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 21(2), 30-43.
Glenn, N. D. (1975). The contribution of marriage to the psychological well-being of males and females. Journal of marriage and family, 37(3), 594-600.
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology. European Journal of Marketing, 3(39), 294-308.
Grable, J. E. (2016). Financial risk tolerance. Switzerland: Springer.
Grable, J. E. & Joo, S. (2000). A cross-disciplinary examination of financial risk tolerance. Consumer Interests Annual, 46(2), 151-157.
Grable, J. E. & Joo, S. (2004). Environmental and biopsychosocial factors associated with financial risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 15(1), 73-82.
Grable, J. E. & Lytton, R. H. (1998). Investor risk tolerance: testing the efficacy of demographics as differentiating and classifying factors. Financial Counselling and Planning, 9(1), 61-73.
Hanna, S., Gutter, M. & Fan, J. (1998). A theory based measure of risk tolerance. Proceedings of the Academy of Financial Services, 12(1), 10-11. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331-360.
Higbee, K. L. & Lafferty, T. (1972). Relationships among risk preferences, importance, and control. The Journal of Psychology, 81(1), 249-251.
Marinelli, N., Mazzoli, C. & Palmucci, F. (2017). How does gender really affect investment behaviour? Economic Letters, 151(3), 58-61.
Marx, J. (2013). Investment Management. 4rd ed. Hatfield, Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Mayo, M. (2000). Investments: An Introduction. 6th ed. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
Meyer, D. F. & Dunga, S H. (2014). The determinants of life satisfaction in a low-income, poor community in South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(13), 163-171. Rachev, S. T., Stoyanov, S. V. & Fabozzi, F. J. (2011). Risk and uncertainty. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Rahmawati, M., Kumar, D., Kamuaya, M., Jamil, F. & Muneer, S. (2015). Determinants of the risk tolerance of individual investors. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 12(1), 373-378.
Rubin, P. H. & Paul, C. W. (1979). An evolutionary model of tastes for risk. Economic Inquiry, 17(4), 585-596.
Sharma, K. (2006). An insight into determinants of financial risk tolerance. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 11(3), 12-23.
Shirazi, M. & Khan, M. A. (2013). Life satisfaction among professional and non-professional students in India. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(4), 109-113.
Slovic, P. (1966). Risk-taking in children: age and sex differences. Child Development, 37(4), 169-176.
Statman, M. (2015). Culture in risk, regret, maximization, social trust, and life satisfaction. Journal of Investment Consulting, 16(1), 20-30.
Sung, J. & Hanna, S. (1996). Factors related to household risk-tolerance: an ordered probit analysis. Consumer Interests Annual, 42(2), 227-228.
Weber, C. (2013). Cultural differences in risk tolerance. Working paper, 01. Erlangen. May.
Yip, U. Y. (2000). Financial risk tolerance: a state or a trait? University of New South Wales. (Thesis-Masters).
Copyright (c) 2019 Zandri Dickason-Koekemoer, Suné Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
