The nexus between Narcissist Followers and Leaders-Antecedent for Toxic Leadership
Abstract
Increasingly, it is recognized that organizations have toxic leaders, who harm organizational success. While they harm organizational success, it can be argued that followers who collude are also contributors to such harm. Literature increasingly points to the interrelationship between leaders and organizations and its impact on organizational success. Notably absent is the systematic examination of the toxic relationship between leaders and followers as colluders and its impact on organizational success. The purpose of the paper is to examine the extent to which followers as colluders reinforce toxic leadership through the relational aspects. The focus is on active, destructive and unethical leaders within the negative leadership continuum, since it is difficult to claim that behaviours representing passiveness and incompetence are equally negative. Through a relational approach to leadership study, the situated commonality between leaders and followers is explored to show that manifestations of narcissism in both leaders and followers who collude in perpetuating toxic leadership can cause organizations to drift into failure. The paper does not consider leadership in any organizational or situational context. The study’s methodology contributes to the objective of the research. The use of a qualitative research method was useful in arguing the exhibitionism of narcissism not only among leaders, but also followers. This method aligns with the purpose of the study. There is a paucity of literature on how the relational aspects of the leader-follower dynamic influence the toxic leadership/ followership reality. The relevancy of the study not only contributes to the literature on toxic leadership, but more specifically showing how narcissist followers as colluders influence narcissist leaders in a toxic leadership relationship. By examining the toxic leader/ follower relationship, a richer understanding of toxic followers can possibly emerge. This is important, since leaders do not produce results alone, together with the followers they contribute to the well-being of the organization. A range of practitioner research articles and published empirical research articles were reviewed to highlight narcissism among toxic leaders and elaborate on the destructive role of followers who reinforce toxic leadership through support. The analysis shows that while leaders and followers as colluders can cause harm to organizational outcomes, the extent of the harm can be largely influenced by the nature of the narcissist traits commonly endorsed by both. The paper highlights an overall framework that may help to identify the major considerations needed to mitigate the harmful effects of the narcissist leader/ follower relationship on positive organisational outcomes. Further, the paper suggests examining the relational aspects of leaders and followers as colluders, especially by looking at the impact of various narcissist traits that potentially strengthen the toxic relationship between the leader and follower. Finally, it is recommended that the proposed guidelines be tested in an empirical paper to measure their effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Bell, R. B. (2017). The Dysfunction Junction: The Impact of Toxic Leadership on Follower Effectiveness. (Doctoral Thesis). Philosophy in Organizational Leadership Research, Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States.
Brown, R. P., Budzek, K. & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951-964.
Chaleff, I. (2009). The Courageous Follower: Standing Up to and for Our Leaders. Oakland, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cheang, H. S. & Appelbaum, S. H. (2015). Corporate psychopathy: deviant workplace behaviour and toxic leaders. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(5), 236-243.
Craig, S. B. & Kaiser, R. B. (2012). Destructive leadership. In M. G. Rumsey (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, G., Schedlitzki, D., Ward, J. & Wood, M. (2015). Exploring critical perspectives of toxic and bad leadership through film. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(3), 363-375.
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 207-216.
Erickson, A., Shaw, B., Murray, J. & Branch, S. (2015). Destructive leadership: Causes, consequences and countermeasures. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 266-272.
Foster, J. D., Shiverdecker, L. K. & Turner, I. N. (2016). What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Measure Across the Total Score Continuum? Current Psychology, 35, 207–219.
Furnham, A., Hyde, G. & Trickey, G. (2014). Do your Dark Side Traits Fit? Dysfunctional Personalities in Different Work Sectors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(4), 589–606.
Goldman, A. (2006). Personality disorders in leaders Implications of the DSM IV-TR in assessing dysfunctional organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 392-414.
Harms, S. P. & Spain, S. M. (2014). Beyond the Bright Side: Dark Personality at Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64(1), 15-24.
Henderson, C. L. (2015). Toxic followership: a measure of followers associated with destructive leadership. (Master dissertation), Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Research, Northern Kentucky University, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Heppel, T. (2011). Toxic leadership: applying the Lipman-Blumen model to political leadership, Representation, 47(3), 241-249.
Jones, D. N. & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The Core of Darkness: Uncovering the Heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27, 521–531.
Karakitapog˘lu-Aygu, Z. & Gumusluoglu, L. (2012). The bright and dark sides of leadership: Transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context. Leadership, 0(0), 1-27.
Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Kelley, R. E. (1992). The power of followership: How to create leaders people want to follow and followers who lead themselves. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Kernberg, O. F. (1998). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical background and diagnostic classification. In E. F. Ronningstam (Ed.), Disorders of Narcissism: Diagnostic, clinical, and empirical implications (pp. 29-51). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Kulas, J. T. (2013). Constructive leader behaviours, the likelihood of derailment and the cuboid personality framework: A replication and extension of Gough (1990). Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(4), 6-24.
Kusy, M. E. & Holloway, E. L. (2009). Toxic workplace: Managing toxic personalities and their systems of power. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Leela, V., Mehta, P. & Jambhulkar, S. (2013). Emergence of destructive leader: proposed definition and formulation of model. International Journal on Leadership, 1(2), 45-59.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians and how we can survive them. Oxford NY: Oxford University Press.
Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review, 69-77.
Mathieu, C., Neumann, C., Babiak, P. & Hare, R. D. (2014). Corporate Psychopathy and the Full-Range Leadership Model. Assessment, 1-12.
Mehta, S. & Maheshwari, G. C. (2014). Toxic leadership: tracing the destructive trail. International Journal of Management, 5(10), 18-24.
Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of personality: DSM-IV and beyond. New York, NY: Wiley.
Mullins, A. K. (2015). The Dimensionality of Destructive Leadership: Toward an Integration of the Bright and Dark Sides. (Doctoral thesis) North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Padilla, A., Hogan, R. & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176-194.
Pelletier, K. L. (2012). Perceptions of and reactions to leader toxicity: Do leader-follower relationships and identification with victim matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 412–424.
Reed, G. E. (2004). Toxic leadership. Military Review, 84(4), 67.
Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A. & Smith, J. R. (2012). Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification based followership. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 7(4), 315-324.
Rosenthal, S. A. (2005). The fine line between confidence and arrogance: Investigating the relationship of self-esteem to narcissism. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
Rosenthal, S. A. & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617-633. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005
Schmidt, A. A. (2008). Development and validation of the toxic leadership scale (Doctoral thesis). (Master dissertation). Science Research, University of Maryland, Maryland Park, Prince George's County, Maryland, United States.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B. & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(25th-anniversary issue), 83-104.
Wortman, M. S. (1982). Strategic management and changing leader-follower roles. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 18, 371-383.
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Copyright (c) 2018 Nirmala Dorasamy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.