Foreign Direct Investment Dynamics in Hungary
Abstract
The study discussed the dynamics of FDI in Hungary during the period from 1991 to 2015. The impact of FDI, FDI trends and determinants of FDI in Hungary were discussed. Empirical literature observed that FDI positively influenced economic growth in Hungary through boosting human capital development levels, total factor productivity, economic transformation, innovation, research and development, additional capital in the economy, modern technology, increased volume of additional capital and technology transfer. The study also revealed that most of the net FDI inflow into Hungary originated from developed countries and the least FDI net inflow came from transitional economies during the period under study. The general trend of FDI net inflow into Hungary followed a mixed pattern, with some years experiencing a positive net FDI inflow whilst other years were characterised by negative net FDI inflows. What is clear however is that FDI net inflow was consistently positive and experienced a positive growth following the integration of Hungary into the EU bloc of countries? The accession of Hungary into the EU removed barriers for the movement of capital, people, goods and services within the EU, reduced the cost of doing business and improved trade openness. These are the key locational advantages of FDI which improved FDI inflow into Hungary for a sustained period of time after the EU accession. The study also empirically tested the determinants of FDI in Hungary using the OLS multiple regression model with data ranging from 1991 to 2015. In contradiction to most previous studies on the subject matter, trade openness and financial development were found to have had a negative influence on FDI. The study also observed that inflation had a positive influence on FDI, contrary to Sayek (2009) who revealed that higher inflation levels erodes the foreign investors’ profits, thereby making the host country not an attractive investment destination. However, exchange rate, education and economic growth had a positive but non-significant impact on FDI in Hungary, consistent to both theoretical and empirical literature. The implication of the study is that the Hungarian authorities are urged to design and implement policies aimed at improving education and economic growth in order to attract more FDI. Practical steps need to be taken by the Hungarian authorities in making sure that the value of the local currency is not overvalued and that trade openness is controlled and managed so that it does not reach a point where it begins to negatively affect FDI inflows.
Downloads
References
Kumar, N. & Pradhan, J. P. (2002). FDI, externalities and economic growth in developing countries: Some empirical explorations and implications for WTO negotiations on investment. RIS Discussion Paper No. 27/2002. New Delhi, India. Lengyel, B. & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The effects of FDI on innovation systems in Hungarian regions: Where is the synergy generated? MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Centre of Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam. Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. Markusen, J. (1995). The boundary of multinational enterprises and the theories of international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 169-189. Moosa, I. A. (2010). International finance: An analytical approach. McGraw Hill Australia Pty Ltd, 3rd edition. Nath, H. (2005). Trade, Foreign direct investment and growth: Evidence from transition economies. SHSU Economics and International Business Working paper No. SHSU-Eco-WP05-04. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University. Pan, Y. (2003). The inflow of foreign direct investment to China: The impact of country specific factors. Journal of Business Research, 56(10), 829-833. Pilarska, C. & Walega, G. (2014). Determinants of FDI inflows to Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary in context of integration into European Union. The 8th International days of statistics and Economics, Pragues, 11(13), 1167-1177. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long run economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. Sayek, S. (2009). Foreign direct investment inflation. Southern Economic Journal, 76(2), 419-443. Sgard, J. (2014). Direct foreign investments and productivity growth in Hungarian firms, 1992-1999. HAL archives-ouvertes. Sridharan, P., Vijayakumar, N. & Chandra, S. R. K. (2009). Causal relationship between foreign direct investment and growth: Evidence from BRICS countries. International Business Research, 2(4), 198203. Tarro, A. & Kramli, A. (2013). Analysis about Hungary’s attractiveness to investors with particular regard to foreign direct investment. Regional Growth, Development and Competitiveness. University of Szeged, Doctoral School in Economics, 101-113. Tatoglu, E. & Glaister, K.W. (1998). An analysis of motives for western FDI in Turkey. International Business Review, 7(2), 203-230. Torlak, E. (2003). Foreign direct investment, technology transfer and productivity growth: Empirical evidence for Hungary, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and Czech Republic. Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Germany. Torrisi, C. R. (2015). FDI in Hungary and Slovakia: The experience of smaller EU economies. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 20, 1-10. UNCTAD. (2012). World Investment Report. New York: United Nations. Vijayakumar, N., Sridharan, P. & Rao, K. C. S. (2010). Determinants of FDI in BRICS countries: A panel data analysis. International Journal of Business, Science and Applied Management, 5(3), 1-13. Wang, Z. Q. & Swain, N. (1997). Determinants of inflow of foreign direct investment in Hungary and China: Time series approach. Journal of International Development, 9(5), 695-726. World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators published by the World Bank, Washington D.C.
Copyright (c) 2018 Kunofiwa Tsaurai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.