Individual Differences Versus Consumer Readiness Variables Predictive Power Over Internet Banking Adoption in South Africa
Abstract
Self-service banking technology is gaining recognition globally in spite of its numerous challenges. Debit cards, ATMs and other Self Service Technologies (SSTs) are well received in South African market; however, customers seem cynical about Internet Banking (IB). IB consumer’s adoption patterns frameworks are tested within this paper based on a framework providing for the South African market with the best explanatory power. Thus, investigating consumer readiness (CR) and individual differences (IDs) variables as common groupings usually cited in the literature consumer variables predictive efficacy, provide better understanding of the consumers towards SSTs in South Africa.CR comprises role clarity, ability and motivation (extrinsic and intrinsic), while IDs includes inertia, technology anxiety, need of interaction, previous experience and demographics. This study purposes to identify among IDs and CR variables, which one with greater predictive power on IB adoption in South Africa.Considering this gap within the body of knowledge, in relation with IB adoption behaviour among the South African consumer is therefore the present article primary objective. Consumer’s individual differences (technology anxiety and education variables specifically) as exogenous variables, through a large sample size (n=1516), descriptive quantitative analysis, were found in context of South African market with greatest predictive power for IB adoption by comparison over consumer readiness. In South Africa particularly for marketers, these findings therefore are a set of relevant keys that can be useful in promoting IB adoption.
Downloads
References
Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments - a qualitative study.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 413-432. Mason, O., Stevenson, C. & Freedman, F. (2014). Ever – present threats from information Technology: The Cyber-Paranoia and Fear Scale. Manson, H. (2002). Driving home value to banking customers. Http://www.mediatoolbox.co.za/pebble.asp?p=63&relid=3126. Mazzocchi, M. (2011). Statistics for Marketing and Consumer Research. London, Consumer buying behavior in financial services: an overview. InternationalJournal of Bank Marketing, 10(5), 4-12. Sage. Meuter, M. L., Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L. & Brown, S. W. (2005). The New Service Encounter: Customer Usage and Satisfaction with Self-Service Technologies. The Journal of Marketing, 69, 61-83. Moyo, J., Nandwa, B., Oduor, J. & Simpasa, A. (2014). Financial Sector Reforms, Competition andBanking System Stability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Macroeconomic Challenges Facing Low-Income Countries. New Perspectives Mungunle, C. M. & Van Vuuren, J. J. (2016). Validating a measurement for entrepreneurship using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. ActaCommercii, 16(1), a 397- http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ac.V16/1.397 Nel, J. (2013). Cell phone banking adoption and continuance of use in an Internet bankingcontext: A study of consumers’ cross-channel cognitive evaluations. Stellenbosch University. Onay, C. & Ozsaz, E. (2013). The impact of Internet banking on brick and mortar branches: The case of Turkey. Journal of Financial Services Research, 44(2), 187-204. Http://dx.doi.org/s10693- 011-0124-9 Oyserman, D. & Sorrenson, N. (2009). Understanding cultural syndrome effects on whatand how we think. A situated cognition model in R. Wyer, Y. –y. Hong. and C. –y Chiu Editions, Understanding culture. Theory, Research and Application: 25-52. NY; Psychology, press. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS,4th Edition. Berkshire, UK, McGraw-Hill. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI). A multiple item scale tomeasure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. Perry, C. (2002). A structured approach to presenting theses: notes for students and their supervisors.International Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16(1), 1-12 Ramavhona, T. C. & Mokwena. S. (2016). Factors Influencing Internet banking in South African rural Areas.South African journal of Information Management, 18(2), a642.htt://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.V18iz-642 Rugimbana, R. (1998). Values, Perceptions, and Consumer Preference Patterns for PersonalBanking Technologies in Australia and Malaysia, MacQuarie University. PhD(Marketing). Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: an empirical investigation.International Journal ofbanking Marketing, 17(7), 324-334 Seligman, L. (2006). Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innoation-decision process. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 108-120. Shambare, R. (2012). Predicting consumer preference for Remote Banking Services in SouthAfrica and Zimbabwe: The role of consumer perspections versus, personality variables. D.Tech Thesis: Tshwane University of Technology. SA. Shiu, E., Hair, J., Bush, R. & Ortinau, D. (2009). Marketing Research. Berkshire, McGraw-Hill. Szmigin, I.T.D. & Bourne, H. (1999). Electronic cash: a qualitative assessment of its adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(4), 192-202. World Wide Web. www.allbankingsolutions. Wu, J. (2005). Factors that influence the adoption of internet banking by South Africans in the Ethekweni metropolitan region. Dissertation of Master of Technology. Marketing Department, Durban Institute of Technology. Yiu, C. S., Grant, K. & Edgar, N. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Hong Kong: implication for the banking sector. International Journal of Information Management, 27(5), 336-351.
Copyright (c) 2018 Aguidissou O. C., Richard Shambare, Rugimbana R.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.