The Time Preference of Chinese Tend to be Less Affected by Positive Emotions: As Proved by an Experimental Study
Abstract
This paper aims at testing whether positive emotions have a different impact on Chinese participants’ time preference choices from American respondents on average, considering that the Chinese people own a different culture background and more inward-oriented national characteristic. The researcher conducted a controlled experiment based on random assignments, and the experiment is specifically adapted for Chinese participants. Further, in order to approach to a more accurate result, the research also determines such effect is influenced, if any, by personality factors such as risk preference. The BDM (Becker-DeGroot-Marschak) and an MPL（Multiple Price List）methods were utilized to gather sufficient data and to ensure accurate measures. This paper indicates that, on average, for a Chinese participant, positive emotion will still reduce their time preference over intertemporal decision regarding to cash payment, but in a smaller amount on average, compared to an American respondent. Also, the result shows that, risk preference does play a role and tend to risk neutral persons have a weaker time-preference, compared to risk-takers and risk-avoiders. Moreover, several other factors, such as the health state, family income, and gender may also have correlation with time preferences. Alternative explanations are proposed at the end. This research may contribute to explain the differences of credit card usages preferences between the Chinese and American consumers and to explicate the reasoning of the Chinese economic miracles in the recent decades.
Downloads
References
Andersen, S. & Harrison, G. W. & Lau, M. I. & Rutström, E. E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3),583-618.
Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H. & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–32.
Benhabib, J. & Bisin, A. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption–saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 460-492.
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A. & Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management science, 35(3), 270-284.
Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J. & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972-1059.
Caplin, A. & Leahy, J. (2001). Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quarterly Journal of economics, 116(1), 55-79.
Chiu, R. K. & Kosinski, F. A. (1994). Is Chinese conflict-handling behavior influenced by Chinese values? Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 22(1), 81-90.
Coller, M. & Williams, M. B. (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2(2), 107-127.
Croson, R. & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 448-474.
DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L. & Lerner, J. S. (2014). Gratitude A Tool for Reducing Economic Impatience. Psychological science, 0956797614529979.
Fishburn, P. C. & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time preference. International Economic Review, 23(2), 677-694.
Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. New York, Macmillan.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of economic literature, 40(2), 351-401.
Fuchs, V. R. (1980). Time preference and health: an exploratory study. Victor R. Fuchs. (Eds) Economic Aspects of Health, (pp. 93-120). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gross, J. J. & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 9(1), 87-108.
Gul, F. & Pesendorfer, W. (2001). Temptation and selfâ€control. Econometrica, 69(6), 1403-1435.
Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I. & Williams, M. B. (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment. American economic review, 92(5), 1606-1617.
Hausman, J. A. (1979). Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1) 33-54.
Hermalin, B. E. & Isen, A. M. (2001). The effect of affect on economic and strategic decision making. USC CLEO Research Paper, (C01-5).
Holcomb, J. H. & Nelson, P. S. (1992). Another experimental look at individual time preference. Rationality and Society, 4(2), 199-220.
Holt, C. A. & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American economic review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
Hsee, C. K. & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions.
Ifcher, J. & Zarghamee, H. (2011). Happiness and time preference: The effect of positive affect in a random-assignment experiment. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3109-3129.
Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive effect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of consumer psychology, 11(2), 75-85.
Isen, A. M. (2007). Positive affect, cognitive flexibility, and self-control. Persons in context: Building a science of the individual, 48(3) 130-147.
Isen, A. M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. Handbook of emotions, 3, 548-573
Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E. & Ashby, F. G. (1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: it is just not worth the risk. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 710.
Jevons, H. S. (1905). Essays on economics. London, Macmilan.
Jevons, W. S. (1888). The theory of political economy. London, Macmillan.
Jiang, J. Chen, X. F. & Chen, A. T. (2011). Approaches and New Progress of the Emotional Inducement. Journal of Xinan Normal University, 36(1), 209-214.
Jin, X. (2009). Research on the measurement of video emotion inducement approaches (Master's thesis, The Second Military Medical University).
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2) 263-291.
Keltner, D., Haidt, J. & Shiota, M. N. (2006). Social functionalism and the evolution of emotions. Evolution and social psychology, 4, 115-142. London: Routledge Press.
Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 54.
Kirby, K. N. & Maraković, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(1), 22-30.
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-477.
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y. & Weber, E. U. (2012). The financial costs of sadness. Psychological science, 0956797612450302.
Leung, K. & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1134.
Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 573-597
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 65(3), 272-292.
Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American economic review, 10, 426-432).
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933-938.
O’Donoghue, T. & Rabin, M. (1999). Addiction and self-control. Addiction: Entries and exits, 24(2) 169-206.
Peng, Y. S. (2012). Study on dynamic parameters of emotional response time] (Master's thesis, Capital Normal University).
Rabin, M. & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Anomalies: Risk aversion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219-232. Retrieved at 2015-4-18 12:49:24. From http://search.proquest.com/docview/212075586?accountid=38789
Riedl, A. M. & Wölbert, E. M. (2013). Measuring time and risk preferences: reliability, stability, Domain Specificity (No. 041). Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute, Netherlands. From: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2302494
Rubinstein, A. (2000). Is It Economics and Psychology The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting. Tel Aviv University, the EitanBerglas School of Economics. International economic review, 104(4), 1207 – 1216.
Russell, J. A. & Yik, M. S. (1996). Emotion among the Chinese.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155-161.
Senior, N. W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. W. Clowes and Sons, Stamford Street.
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100(1), 557 - 571
Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8(3), 201-207.
Thaler, R. H. & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406.
Warner, J. T. & Pleeter, S. (2001). The personal discount rate: Evidence from military downsizing programs. American Economic Review, 91(1), 33-53.
Westermann, R., Stahl, G. U. N. T. E. R. & Hesse, F. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: analysis. European Journal of social psychology, 26, 557-580.
Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), pp. S105 - S122. doi:10.1002/per.426
Zhou Y. A., Zuo, C. Y., Chen Y. F., Lian H. Q. & Ye, H. (2012). Experimental study with social preferences of individual risk aversion. Management World, 6, 86-95.
Copyright (c) 2017 Shi Yingnan, Xinghao Li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
