Foreign Direct Investment in Russia: Stakeholders' Views and Perceptions
Abstract
Volumes of foreign direct investments (FDI) are growing steadily, however, transition economies, such as Russia, are attracting only a minor share of FDI despite of available potentials. Risk aversion is one of the reasons influencing decision-making processes of FDI investors. This paper reviews existing objective and subjective risks, which impact decisions regarding FDI. The results of the paper are based on the extensive dialogue with stakeholders from Austria, Germany and Japan on the risks for FDI in Russia as well as on the outcomes of the discussions on barriers for trade in frames of the workshop, which brought together Russian and European stakeholders. The results show that political, regulatory, revenue, currency and operational risks within the economy of Russia are perceived by FDI investors from different sectors such as construction, financing, automotive and other industries as being the most likely and probable risks for FDI in Russia. The majority of investors perceive political risks as a greater barrier for investment in Russia. These perceptions are influenced by existing asymmetries on the market and the political decision-making dominance over business environment. Our results support existing evidence on impacts of uncertainties connected with political and regulatory risks for FDI in Russia. However, we did not find evidence that these risk perceptions were affected by creation of the Eurasian Customs Union, neither in positive nor in a negative way. The results suggest that significant progress was already done by improving investment climate in Russia but further efforts are also needed on addressing regulatory risks such as dealing with construction permits, protecting minority investors or simplifying customs regulations, as well as addressing existing market asymmetries.
Downloads
References
Adam, A. & Filippaios, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and civil liberties: A new perspective. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1038-1052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.08.006
Alesina, A., Spolaore, E. & Wacziarg, R. (2005). Trade, Growth and the Size of Countries. Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1B. Edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01023-3
Azam, M. & Ahmed, A. (2015). Role of human capital and foreign direct investment in promoting economic growth: Evidence from Commonwealth of Independent States. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(2), 98 – 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2014-0092
Bleyzer Foundation. (2002). The Bleyzer Initiative: Completing the Economic Transition in FSU Countries, The Bleyzer Foundation, Kiev.
Blonigen, B. (2001). In search of substitution between foreign production and exports. Journal of International Economics, 53, 81 - 104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00066-0
Brainard, S. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity – concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87, 520-544
Busse, M. & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397-415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.02.003
Campos, N. & Kinoshita, Y. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment as Technology Transferred: Some Panel Evidence from the Transition Economies. The Manchester School, 70(3), 398-419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00309
Corcoran, A. & Gillanders, R. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Review World Economics, 151, 103-126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-014-0194-5
Dunning, J. (1998). Globalization and the new geography of foreign direct investment. Oxford Development Studies, 26(1), 1998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819808424145
Dunning, J. (1973). The determinants of international production. Oxford Economic Paper, 25, 289-336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041261
Egger, E. & Winner, H. (2005). Evidence on Corruption as an incentive for Foreign Direct Investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 932-952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.01.002
Eicher, T. S., Papageorgiou, C. & Raftery, A. E. (2011). Default Priors and Predictive Performance in Bayesian Model Averaging, with Application to Growth Determinants. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(1), 30–55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1112
Hall, R. & Jones, C. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
Harms, P. & Ursprung, H. (2002). Do Civil and Political Repression Really Boost Foreign Direct Investment? Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 651-663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.4.651
Hox, J. & de Leeuw, E. (2002). The Influence of Interviewers’ Attitude and Behavior on Household Survey Nonresponse: an International Comparison. In R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, R.J.A. Little (Eds.) (2002). Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
Grasmik, K. (2015). Alternative Assessment of Volume and Industry Structure of Foreign Direct Investment in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 26(3), 218-224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700715030065
Iwasaki, I. & Tokunaga, M. (2014). Macroeconomic Impacts of FDI in Transition Economies: A Meta-Analysis. World Development, 61, 53-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.022
Janjua, P. & Samad, G. (2007). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth: The Case of Middle Income Developing Countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), Papers and Proceedings PARTS I and II Twenty-third Annual General Meeting and Conference of the Pakistan Society of Development Economists Islamabad, March 12-14, 2008 (Winter 2007), pp. 711-722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30541/v46i4IIpp.711-722
Jayasuriya, D. (2011). Improvements in the World Bank’s ease of doing business rankings: do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows? World Bank Research Working Paper, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5787
Jude, C. & Levieuge, G. (2014). Growth Effect of FDI in Developing Economies: the Role of Institutional Quality. DR LEO 2013-11. 2014.
Kim, H. (2010). Political Stability and Foreign Direct Investment. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v2n3p59
Klapper, L., Laeven, L. & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry Regulation as a Barrier to Entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
Kobrin, S. (2005). The determinants of liberalization of FDI policy in developing countries: 1991–2001. Transnational Corporations, 14(1), 67–103
Kolstad, I. & Villanger, E. (2008). Determinants of foreign direct investment in services. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(2), 518-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.09.001
Komendantova, N., Patt, A. & Williges, K. (2011). Solar power investment in North Africa: Reducing perceived risks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4829-4835 (December 2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.068
Lawless, M. (2009). Tax complexity and inward investment. Research Technical Papers 5/RT/09, Central Bank of Ireland.
Lucke, H. & Eichler, S. (2016). Foreign direct investment: the role of institutional and cultural determinants. Applied Economics, 48(11), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1090551
Martinez-San, R., Bengoa, M. & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2015). Foreign direct investment, trade integration and the home bias: evidence from the European Union. Empirical Economics, Springer, 2015
Mkrtchyan, A. & Gnutzmann, H. (2014). Mutual Protectionism? An Assessment of the Eurasian Customs Union. Department of Economics, European University Institute
Neary, J. (2009). Trade costs and foreign direct investment. International Review of Economic Financing, 19, 207 - 218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2008.06.004
Pfaffermayer, M. (1996). Foreign outward direct investment and exports in Austrian manufacturing: substitutes or complements? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132, 501-552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707510
Rosstat, (2015). Russia 2015 Statistical Pocketbook. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat)
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science, 236, 280-285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Stepanova, A. (2013). Eurasian Union and Ukraine. Monography, Moscow, Russia (In Russian).
Tuman, J. & Emmert, C. (1999). Social Science Quarterly Vol. 80, No. 3 (September 1999), pp. 539-555
UNCTAD. (2015). World Investment Report: 2014. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment Data Base: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2014). World Investment Report: 2013. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2010). World Investment Report 2010, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2003). World Investment Report: 2003. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2002). World Investment Report: 2002. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.
World Economic Forum. (2014). Global Risks Report 2014. Geneva.
World Bank. (2013). Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.
