Management's Commitment, Education and Ethics on Organisational Entrepreneurship: The Case of South African Non-Profit Organisations
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to explore the management characteristics that are related to organisational entrepreneurship in not-for-profit organisations (NPOs) in Gauteng, South Africa as well as the relationship between organisational entrepreneurship and the organisational performance. The methodology involved a quantitative approach of collecting and analysing research data. A field study was conducted in Johannesburg, South Africa whereby research data were collected from 257 NPO managers from voluntary organizations. Using the SPSS 22 and the AMOS 22 software program, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was performed to analyze the research data. The study noted implications for NPO management teams, including the renovation of business model structures to incorporate continuous learning and constructive risk-taking in order to take advantage of the performance benefits derived from organisational entrepreneurship. The study also recommends further research into potential citizenship bodies for NPO management teams to foster commitment to their occupation in the non-profit sector. The research makes a significant contribution by providing a framework in which management's commitment to NPOs can be measured and analysed.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Rashid, Z., Sambasivan, M. & Johari, J. (2003). The influence of corporate culture and organisational commitment on performance. Journal of management development, 22(8), 708-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710310487873
Albrecht, W. S., Stice, E. K. & Stice, J. D. (2011). Financial Accounting: Concepts and applications. 11th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W. & Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628-1654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652
Argote, L. & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization science, 22(5), 1123-1137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
Austin, J., Stevenson, H. & Weiâ€Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Bargraim, J., Potgieter, T., Schultz, H., Viede, C. & Werner, A. (2003). Organisational Behaviour: A Contemporary South African Perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Balser, D. & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Non profit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 295-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70
Chalmers, D. M. & Balan-Vnuk, E. (2012). Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the micro foundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. International Small Business Journal, 0266242612465630.
Chawarika, A. (2016). Assessment of the Critical Constraints to Wheat Production in Zimbabwe. Business and Social Sciences Journal, 1(1) 34-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26831/BSSJ.2016.1.1.33-48
Chimucheka, T. (2015). The Contribution of Entrepreneurship Education in Improving Entrepreneurial Skills and Knowledge of SMME Owners and Managers. Journal of Economics, 6(2), 149-155.
Chinomona, R., Lin, J. Y. C., Wang, M. C. H. & Cheng, J. M. S. (2010). Soft power and desirable relationship outcomes: the case of Zimbabwean distribution channels. Journal of African Business, 11(2), 182-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2010.508997
Chiva, R., GrandÃo, A. & Alegre, J. (2010). Adaptive and generative learning: Implications from complexity theories. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 114-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00255.x
Cho, V. & Huang, X. (2012). Professional commitment, organizational commitment, and the intention to leave for professional advancement: An empirical study on IT professionals. Information Technology & People, 25(1), 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841211204335
Collins, H. (2010). Creative research: the theory and practice of research for the creative industries. Ava Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 4thEdition London UK. Sage publications.
Crutchfield, L. R. & Grant, H. M. (2012). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits. USA. San Francisco. John Wiley & Sons.
Dawes, J. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International journal of market research, 51(1), 61-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
Department of Social Development. (2014). Non Profit Organisation. [Online] Available at: http://www.dsd.gov.za/npo/ [Accessed 28 June 2014]
Draper, J., Clark, L. & Rogers, J. (2016). Managers’ role in maximising investment in continuing professional education: Jan Draper and colleagues look at ways to create positive cultures that make the most of learning in practice. Nursing Management, 22(9), 30-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.22.9.30.s29
Drejer, A. (2000). Organisational learning and competence development. The learning organization, 7(4), 206-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470010342306
Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 76(6), 149-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.40619980906
Fagarasanu, M. & Kumar, S. (2002). Measurement instruments and data collection: a consideration of constructs and biases in ergonomics research. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 30(6), 355-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00101-4
Fairlie, R. W. & Holleran, W. (2012). Entrepreneurship training, risk aversion and other personality traits: Evidence from a random experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 366-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.001
Fu, F. Q., Bolander, W. & Jones, E. (2009). Managing the drivers of organizational commitment and salesperson effort: An application of Meyer and Allen's three-component model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(4), 335-350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679170403
Galpin, J. S. (2013). Statistical research design and analysis. [Lecture notes]. Johannesburg, South Africa: University of the Witwatersrand, School of Statistics and Actuarial Science
Garcia-Morales, V. J., Llorens-Montes, F. J. & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), 21-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610642940
Grobman, G. M. (2008). The nonprofit handbook: Everything you need to know to start and run your nonprofit organization.
Harris, M. (2012).Nonprofits and business toward a subfield of nonprofit studies. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 41(5), 892-902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012443735
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, 2.
Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0223-4
Kantur, D. (2016). Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link. Management Decision, 54(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2014-0660
Kao, R. W., Kao, K. R. & Kao, R. R. (2005). An entrepreneurial approach to stewardship accountability: Corporate residual and global poverty. USA. Massettussetts: World Scientific Publishing.
King Committee on Corporate Governance. (2009). King Report on Governance for South Africa. Institute of Directors, Southern Africa.
Kong, E. (2007). The strategic importance of intellectual capital in the non-profit sector. Journal of Intellectual capital, 8(4), 721-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710830864
Kotler, P. & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing management. Global ed. Harlow: Pearson Education
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R. & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of marketing, 75(1), 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.1.16
Matei, P. N., Bolcas, C. B., Badea, F. & Carstea, C. (2010). Risk management: Key process in the current financial context. In Global Conference of Business and Financial Proceedings, 5(2), 47-51.
Maziriri, E. T. & Chinomona, E. (2016). Modelling the Influence of Relationship Marketing, Green Marketing and Innovative Marketing on the Business Performance of Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMES). Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 8(3), 127-139.
Miller, D., Steier, L. & Bretonâ€Miller, L. (2016). What Can Scholars of Entrepreneurship Learn From Sound Family Businesses? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 445-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12231
Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial marketing management, 39(8), 1311-1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.005
Rivera-Santos, M., Holt, D., Littlewood, D. & Kolk, A. (2015). Social entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 72-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0128
Schuster, T. & Holtbrügge, D. (2014). Resource dependency, innovative strategies, and firm performance in BOP markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(S1), 43-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12191
Sessa, V. I., London, M., Pingor, C., Gullu, B. & Patel, J. (2011). Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 17(3/4), 146-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111143691
Sullivan Mort, G., Weerawardena, J. & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International journal of nonprofit and voluntary sector marketing, 8(1), 76-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202
Weerawardena, J. & Sullivan-Mort, G. (2001). Learning, innovation and competitive advantage in not-for-profit aged care marketing: A conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Nonprofit& Public Sector Marketing, 9(3), 53-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v09n03_04
Wood, V. R., Bhuian, S. & Kiecker, P. (2000). Market orientation and organizational performance in not-for-profit hospitals. Journal of Business Research, 48(3), 213-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00086-1
Ullman, J. B. & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modelling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Van Vuuren, L. J. & Crous, F. (2005). Utilising appreciative inquiry (AI) in creating a shared meaning of ethics in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(4), 399-412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-7307-3
Venter, M., Chuchu, T. & Pattison, K. (2016). An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of consumer generated content on the purchase intention of sports apparel brands. Journal of Contemporary Management, 13, 27-54
Yujuico, E. (2008). Connecting the dots in social entrepreneurship through the capabilities approach. Socio-economic review, 6(3), 493-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn003
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.
This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.