Analysis of the Perceptions of School Administrators on the Recent Published Regulation

  • Saduman Kapusuzoglu Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Ankara
  • Habibe Ozturk Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Ankara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i2(J).1257

Abstract

The aim of study is to examine the perceptions of school administrators about the regulation published on 10th June 2014. This study is a qualitative research and in order to acquire the data phenomenological method, which provides to focus on cases that we are aware of but do not have deep and detailed insight, was used. The target group of the study included 5 primary, 5 secondary and 2 high school administrators in Ankara province Polatlı district. The target group was designed based on purposive sampling method. The data was collected by using semi-structured interview method. Content analysis method was conducted to analyze the data. School principals in the study, expressed their ideas as follows; the assessments for school managements should be done by a lawful and objective exam. The exam should be written. The exam should be esteemed at; general ability, education management and regulations. The written exam should apply for both work of director and assistant director. Although the first rule for being appointed to educational institutions is being selected by an exam, the management knowledge and ability, master’s degree, in service training on management etc. should be given importance, too.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arıkan, G. (2007). Analysis of Policies and Applications at School Administrators’ Attaintment Process in Ministry of National Education (Unpublished Thesis). Beykent University, İstanbul. Bakioğlu, A. & Özcan, K. (2001). The Carrier Developments of Primary School Principals. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practices, 1, 39-57.

Balyer, A. & Gündüz, Y. (2011). Training School Principals in Different Countries: A New Model Proposal for the Turkish Educational System. The Journal of Theoretical Education Science, 4(2), 182-197. Cemaloğlu, N. (2005). The Training of School Principals and Their Employment inTurkey: Current Situation, Possible Developments in the Future and Problems. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Education, 25(2), 249-274. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications. Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Narratives and Stories. In Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, 54-82, Thousan Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Demir, S. B. & Pınar, M. A. (2013). Investigation of Manager Opinions on the Content and Scoring Criteria of the 2011 Manager Appointment and Rotation RegulationTurkish Studies, 8(6), 123-143. Dogan, S., Demir, S. B. & Pınar, M. A. (2014). MONE 2013 Regulation for Administrator Assignment and Relocation Based on the Opinions of Administrators. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 7(2), 224-245. Graczyk, S. L. (1991). A Model for Planning Graduate Programs in School Business Administration. Planning and Changing, 22(2), 108-120. Günay, E. (2004). Assessment of Ideas of Administrators and Teachers Related to Chosing, Traning and Appointing of Administrators for Educational Institutions: Sample of Ankara Province. (Unpublished Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara. Ishida, H. (1997). MBA Education in Japan. The Experience of Management Education at the Graduate School of Business Administration, Keio University, Japan. Journal of Management Development, 16(3), 185-196. Korkmaz, M. (2005). Training of School Administrators: Problems-Conclusions and Suggestions. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Education, 25(3), 237-252. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage. MONE (2014). Ministry of National Education. Regulation for Attainment and Rotation of Administrators at Educational Institutions. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/egikuryon_1/egikuryon_1.html. (28/03/2015). Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage Publications. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action Research a Guide for the Teacher Researcher. Boston: Pearson Education. Özmen, F. & Kömürlü, F. (2010). Ideas of Educators About Application of National Education Ministry on Selection and Appointing Administrators. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 25-32. Patton, Q. M. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage Publications. Serin, S. (2007). Assessment of Primary School Administrators’ Success by Classroom and Branch Teachers (Sample of Siirt Province). (Unpublished Thesis). Beykent University, İstanbul. Silah, M. (2001). Personel Motivation for Improving the Quality of Work at Educational Organizations. C.U. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 95-109. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage Publicatations. Süngü, H. (2012). Appointment and Training of School Administrators in Turkey, Germany and England. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 1(3), 33-48. Taş, A. & Önder, E. (2010). Comparison of Regulations Published in 2004 and After 2004 Related to Appointment and Rotation of Administrators at Educational Institutions. Süleyman Demirel University, Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 2(12), 171-185. Tortop, N. (1994). Personel Management. Ankara: Yargı Publishing. Turan, S. & Şişman, M. (2000). Standards for School Administrators: Thoughts on Knowledge Bases of Educational Administrators. Balıkesir University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 3(4), 68-87. Yeloğlu, D. (2008). Assessment of School Administrators’ Ideas Related to Choosing and Appointment of Educational Institutions’ Administrators. (Unpublished thesis). Yeditepe University, İstanbul. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences, (5th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Published
2016-05-11
How to Cite
Kapusuzoglu, S., & Ozturk, H. (2016). Analysis of the Perceptions of School Administrators on the Recent Published Regulation. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 8(2(J), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i2(J).1257
Issue
Vol 8 No 2(J) (2016)
Section
Research Paper

Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author (s) should affirm that the material has not been published previously. It has not been submitted and it is not under consideration by any other journal. At the same time author (s) need to execute a publication permission agreement to assume the responsibility of the submitted content and any omissions and errors therein. After submission of a revised paper in the light of suggestions of the reviewers, editorial team edits and formats manuscripts to bring uniformity and standardization in published material.

This work will be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) and under condition of the license, users are free to read, copy, remix, transform, redistribute, download, print, search or link to the full texts of articles and even build upon their work as long as they credit the author for the original work. Moreover, as per journal policy author (s) hold and retain copyrights without any restrictions.