The Effects of BRICS and MATIK Counties on world Economy and Cointegration Analysis the Long Term relation With G-7 Growth Rates (1962-2012)

: In this article, long term data is analyzed for the total growth of the world economy and the growth of developed (G7) and of the rapid developing economies. BRICS countries are known countries with their meetings since 2008. Rapidly developing countries such as Mexico, Argentina, Turkey, Indonesia and Korea are defined as MATIKin thisanalysisexceptthecountriesfor BRICS meeting. Especially, the basic hypotheses of this study is that BRICS+MATIK countries whose economic shares slowly increase were compared with G-7 and the global economy, i) Help of BRICS+MATIK economies rapidly increase for the growth rate of world economy: ii)They’re the hypotheses that BRICS+MATIK economies are cointegrated with the growth of world economy in long term. In this way, it may be possible that the help of G-7 is compared with the help of BRICS+MATIK economies for the growth of world economy. The study uses the annual data of the 1962-2012 periods. Time series analysis is used to test the hypotheses. The most important finding is that BRICS+MATIK economies affect the growth rate of world economy, and it constantly increases as statistic according to the help of G-7.The result has been acquired that World, G-7, and BRICS+MATIK economies cointegrated in the long term.


Introduction
Goldman Sachs has used the abbreviation of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) for the first time to mean "rapid developing economies" in 2001 (Singh, 2013).After the regional economic cooperation organization begin to increase in last 40 years, in the final period, BRIC economies became the main topic as structuring beyond the regional samples in 2006.These economies have partially become official with the meeting that was made by foreign affairs ministers of the 4 national rapid developing economies.Brazil, Russia, India and China leaders have reached a consensus for meeting once a year in order to discuss economical and political issues.So, some kind of unity that has formed with the initials (BRIC) of these 4 countries.In 2011, when South Africa was invited to the third meeting in China, the group had a new addition and have been called BRICS ever since.In 2006, from the first meeting at a level of Foreign affairs ministers to the present meetings were made about foreign affairs, finance and economy, trade, agriculture, and health.The meetings have continued about science, technology, trade rivalry and national security.In 2011, in the third meeting, it reached a consensus about playing a central role for the world economy (Schmalz and Ebenau, 2012).It expanded visions that BRICS economies probably will be the biggest economies of the world in by 2030 (Khan, 2011;Yao and Liu, 2011).Some abbreviations are generated for the rapid developing economies except BRICS.For example, the abbreviations such as Mexico, Argentina, Nigeria and Turkey (MANT); Poland, Indonesia, Korea and South Africa (PIKS); BRIC+Argentina (BRIC-A) are in question (Aggarwal, 2013;Aktan et al., 2009).I use (MATIK) abbreviation for Mexico, Argentina, Turkey, Indonesia and Korea in this study, and while I do my analysis through BRICS, I also do it for MATIK.Moreover, I include (BRICS+MATIK) into the analysis by combining these two rapidly developing country groups that generate a great majority of the world's population and economy.In addition, I include BRICS+MATIK economies into the analysis by comparing them with the world and the G-7 economies.According to January data of 2014, while world population is 7.145 billion, G-7 countries are 747.914million; BRICS+MATIK countries population is 3.512.958million.Proportionately, BRICS+MATIK generate 49,16% of world population, and G-7 countries generate 10,46% of world population.According to the data in Table-1, (G7+BRICS+MATIK.Shortly GBM) countries that are added to the analysis, generate 59,63%; generate 74,16% of world economy.According to 1962-2012 years, G-7 countries show the average 2,9%; BRICS countries show the average 3,7%, and MATIK countries show the average 4,8% for the growth performance.The average growth rate is 3,8% for GBM.In the same period, while world economy has the average growth 3,45%, the average growth rate of OECD has realized as 3,13%.The most distinct difference of the developing countries from G-7 economies is shown as that liberalization of market mechanism, excess of public sector activities, undercapitalization stock, and lowness of domestic saving isn't enough.Economic liberalism policies gain wide currency to resolve these troubles.Strengthening the free market, and shortening of trade liberalization and of the state economic activities, has been adopted by the developing countries (Ban and Blyth, 2013).However, even if statism and patrimonialism continue their effects in BRICS economies (Becker, 2013), and it won't be wrong that the same effects are also true for MATIK economies.These effects are the one of the basic hypotheses of economic theory that while articulation degree increases, they will be removed.Thus, the average growth rates of BM countries occur higher than G-7, OECD and World averages.Graph 1 shows the growth rates.
The basic researched hypothesis in this study: is about increasing of shares of BRICS+MATIK (BM) countries in the world economy.In the same time, G-7 countries became the most efficient determiner of the world economy until 1990s.With 1990s, theuniquehypothesis is researchedaboutthat UN countriesstronglycontributethegrowthtrend of worldeconomy.Especially after this period, other researched hypothesis is that BM economies are whether or not more efficient than G-7 economies in the average growth of world economy.In addition to those, it shows that even if fragilities of BM economies increase, and it is proportionally affected more than G-7 economies by the fluctuations of the world economy.

Literature Review
The economists have strongly been interested in the developing country economies.Also, there are several studies that analyze this structuring after the BRICS meeting in 2008.These studies analyze the BRICS economies from the different majors, and conclude the general result that the cooperation between developing economies increase the activities of these economies.It is emphasized that the activities of the developing countries that don't have activity by themselves, are increasing with their cooperation attempts (Keukeleire and Hooijmaaijers, 2013).On the other hand, BRICS structuring has cooperated and has begun to take more common position about their positions in international organizations (e.g.G20) (Luckhurst, 2013).
According to "rapid developing economies" category, even if there isn't a formal cooperation between MATIK countries, they follow closely BRICS economies.Therefore, it may be assumed that the definition of MATIK will represent the results of researches in question for BRICS economies.For rapid developing economies, literature is extremely gathered at main subjects such as FDI, NFL, technology transfer, labor force and sensibility against shocks.Generally, FDI make a positive result about developments for the economic development, globalization and science and technology in the developing economies (Das, 2013).This effect also shows a high level for the BRICS economies.Especially, it slowly increases in the field of innovation.Wang and Ying (2014) have concluded on patent applications.In addition, they state that foreign domination decreased in field of novelty, and especially China became prominent in this field.In the same time, particularly, these relations deeply affect and transform labor and marketing habits (Biggemann and Fam, 2010) at a level of firm in Russia and China.This effect also develops competitive advantages with developments in the field of technology, communication and infrastructure (Stone and Ranchhod,2006).When the development in human resources is added, it provides a basis that the growth performance of BRICS economies also continues in the future (Yao and Liu,2011).Moreover, Lotz et al. (2013)  4 other economies except India.The BRICS economies and exchanges have the continuous increase trend for the mutual dependence on each other, and are also in a cointegration relation for long term (Gambhir and Bhandari, 2011).With the 2008 financial crisis, the relation between the BRICS economies and the stock market of developed economies has had a change.Correlation relation between India and China has grown stronger (Zhang and Yu, 2013).In the same time, the relation between the USA and BRICS slowly grew stronger (Aloui et al., 2011), and dependence increased.This dependence strengthened price-earning relation with growth rates with regards to developed countries (Bao,2009;Gambhir and Bhandari, 2011).
The banking system also had strengthened financial relations beside this interaction in exchanges, and this situation has provided that foreign direct capital investments increased between countries (Kaur et al. 2013).
In the same time, the widest foreign investment was to Africa, India and China (Aggarwal, 2011).Also, the BRICS economies investee in low-income countries, and established commercial and financial ties (Samake and Yang, 2014;Holtbrügge and Kreppel, 2012), and these ties have growth potential for both sides.So, they have slowly began to play an important role on global growth (Schrooten, 2011), and the growth centered BRICS economies changed the traditional domination of USA, Europe and Japan (Pillania, 2009).In the same time, it strengthened the production relations of countries.For example, Vries et al. (2012) has analyzed productivity through 35 sectors, and has concluded that total productivity increased for 4 countries except Brazil in the study.Haq and Mailke (2010) concluded that import-demand elacticity of India is lower than the 4 other countries in trade relation between BRICS economies and high income economies.Jadhav (2012) has acquired statistical results about that the efficient factors of BRICS economies are market size, trade liberalization, accountability and foreign direct capital investment on economic growth.It is seen that applied monetary policies by the BRICS economies (Mallick and Sousa, 2013) are sensitive to shocks, and a monetary tightening is also efficient on total output growth with financial markets (Mallick and Sousa,2013).According to the effects of inflation for the growth, Manamperi (2014) (Chang et al., 2012).

Methodology
Current data in the study has been acquired by the annual data base of World Bank from 1962 to 2012.1990 pre-data of Russian Federation belong to the USSR, and have been taken from Harrison (1993).German data is only from the Federal Republic Germany (West Germany) until 1990, before the re-unification with East Germany.Analysis has been realized in two stages.Principally, curvilineal trends have been acquired by using 6 degree polynomial functions of data sets.Moreover, correlation relation has been calculated between country groups.In the same time, regression estimates of country and country groups with world economy were acquired.In the last stage, regression equation estimates have been principally presented between the world economy and country groups.After that, Engle-Granger (EG) two-staged cointegration test and Johansen-Juselius (JJ) long termed cointegration test have been made to determine long term relations.Also, stability of preconditioned data sets have been tested with Dickey-Fuller (ADF), Phillips-Perron (PP) and KPSS unit root tests to make these tests.

Results
World, G-7, BRICS, and MATIK have been acquired for the first stage of analysis, and 6 degree polynomials have been acquired and have shown a curvilineal trend for the BM data.Polynomials are like that:  The relation of world economy growth and the strongest correlation are still between G-7 countries.However, BRICS and MATIK economies also have an important coefficient.The most remarkable and important subject is that the relation of the country groups can be explained between world economy and correlation with the level of development.The same relation form is also effective for country groups.For example, according to MATIK (0,34), BRICS have stronger correlation with the G-7 (0,54), and according to BRICS (0,54), G-7 show the stronger correlation with world economy (0,96).In the continuing stage of analysis, regression models have been generated to can be informed that world economy is affected by which country or country groups.The acquired findings from these models are shown in Table 4-6.The acquired results from the regression model that the growth rates of world economy are the dependent variables, are shown in Table-4.Accordingly, while 1% rise of G-7 countries contributes 0,69% to the world economy, 1% growth of BRICS economies contribute 0,11% to the world economy, and MATIK economies contribute 0,06%.When BRICS and MATIK countries are discussed together, the acquired regression results have been shown in Table -5.(-2,935001), UK (-2,925169) and the Russian Federation.(-2,933158).MacKinnon critical value at 5% meaning level has been calculated as -2,921175 for PP test in all countries and country groups.Asymptotic Critical Values at 5% meaning level has been calculated as 0,463000 for KPSS test in all countries and country groups.The results with "*" sign hasn't been constant in KPSS test results."**" is constant at 1% meaning level.
According to regressions, the share and activity of G7 is still quite high for the world economy.However, the effect of developing country groups slowly increases.The most distinct reason of this originated from the average growth rates which are higher than the world average.As second and last stage of the time series analysis has been made.Principally, unit root test has been made for countries and country groups, and the acquired results have been given in Table-7 for three different tests.Series are constant from the same level, and according to their level values, they don't include unit root.Therefore, they are useable for long termed analysis.Granger 2 staged cointegration test has been made for country groups.Accordingly, it is expected that the creating regressions are constant through the level values of error terms.If this hypothesis occurred, it may be concluded that two variables are cointegrated in the long term.The acquired results have been shown in Table -8.The results belonging to unit root tests are presented for error terms of regressions in "a" panel for "b" panel of Table-8.Error terms are constant for each three unit root test, and include unit root.Therefore, it is concluded that there is a long term cointegrated between variable binaries for the regressions in "a" panel.However, due to EG test isn't enough for more than 2 variables, JJ test has been applied for more than 2 variables.While the world economy is a dependent variable, JJ test results that country groups are independent variables, are given in Table 9. Trace and Max-Eigen statistics are compared with calculated values for 0,05 meaning level to determine how many cointagrated vectors.According to Akaike and Schwarz information criterion, the values have been calculated for 2 lags.H0 hypothesis will be rejected for Trace Stat.> 0,05 meaningfulness critical value.H0 hypothesis will be rejected for Max-Eigen Stat.> 0,05 meaningfulness critical value.Accordingly, it is concluded that H1 hypothesis will be accepted in the first line, and there is "maximal 1 cointegrated vector".

Conclusion
Country and world economies have fluctuations that cannot mostly be doped and sometimes cause the structural changes.These fluctuations rise as domestic to economies on global scale like in 1929 and 1974, and it can also be raised from the noneconomic developments as World War 2. So, even if the fluctuations are domestic and external, they can leave the lasting impressions on economic structuring.In this study, it analyzed that depends on a political development on global scale created the differences in country economies in 1990, it affected world economy to what extent.These economies that are defined as the developing countries, and expand and make deep economic relations between each other, has begun quite effective in world economy.The most common known BRICS from these country groups have begun to be example for the developing countries.Forthisstudy, when MATIK countriesbeganto be integratedtoworldeconomy in 1990, theyhavesuccessedtocointegratewiththeworldeconomy in longterm.It has been seen that these country groups that shows a faster growth performance than the average growth rate of world economy, slowly increased their activities in the world economy growth rate.On the other hand, G7 countries have a lower average growth rate than neither the world economy or the growth rate of BRICS+MATIK countries.In the same time, it is seen that depth and width also increase in economic relations between G7 and BRICS+MATIK economies, and support the world economy.It is expected that developing countries have fast and effective growth process and integrated to world economy, it has reached that country group as G7 provide the help to the world economy in future years with its condition.Accordingtoregressions, theshareandactivity of G7 is stil quitehighforworldeconomy.However, the effect of developing country groups slowly increase.The most distinct reason of this arise originate that the average growth rates are higher than world average.

Table 1 : Countries, BRICS and MATIK Rates for World Total
The data was taken from the World Bank.The population data belongs to January 2014, and GDP data is belongs to 2012.

Table 2
Graphs have been given as No. 1 for polynomials.First coefficients in each polynomials inform the way and intensity of observed fluctuations in No.1 graph.

Table 5 : World Economy, G-7 and BM.
According to Table-5, BRICS and MATIK countries are discussed together, it is seen that 1% rise of this country group on the growth rates contribute 0,18% to the growth rate of world economy.However, it is seen that there is no change for the contribution of G-7 countries.The contribution results of each country for the world economy are shown in Table-6 that is related to the regression equation.